National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 97 days, net -141. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,767–9,950 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 02:21
9,788
-4
7 Nov 2026, 21:21
9,792
-5
4 Nov 2026, 14:00
9,797
-4
1 Nov 2026, 19:10
9,801
-11
29 Oct 2026, 10:10
9,812
-2
26 Oct 2026, 13:19
9,814
-13
23 Oct 2026, 09:00
9,827
-6
17 Oct 2026, 21:29
9,833
-3
15 Oct 2026, 05:19
9,836
-9
12 Oct 2026, 08:18
9,845
-6
5 Oct 2026, 16:17
9,851
-13
28 Sept 2026, 07:57
9,864
+6
19 Sept 2026, 00:17
9,858
-2
14 Sept 2026, 08:19
9,860
-11
10 Sept 2026, 16:37
9,871
-13
5 Sept 2026, 17:16
9,884
-2
1 Sept 2026, 16:35
9,886
-2
29 Aug 2026, 17:36
9,888
+5
26 Aug 2026, 08:26
9,883
-13
23 Aug 2026, 07:35
9,896
first reading
Engagement
91 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.7%
avg views ÷ 9,788 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,440
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 91 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held
91 (20 July 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total
53,132
Reactions total
1,213
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Nov 2026, 22:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2h 13m
Average length
2m 08s
Measured directly from 63 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,067 reactions across 90 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
722
23.5%
👍
410
13.4%
💩
375
12.2%
🤮
322
10.5%
❤
192
6.26%
🖕
156
5.09%
🔥
154
5.02%
👏
150
4.89%
🤬
111
3.62%
😁
105
3.42%
🤣
56
1.83%
😢
53
1.73%
🤡
39
1.27%
🤔
38
1.24%
🌭
30
0.978%
🙏
23
0.75%
⚡
21
0.685%
🤷
19
0.619%
👌
17
0.554%
😱
14
0.456%
18 further kinds
60
1.96%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 90 of the 91 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,067 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 37 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
«Don't fuck with the Jews»-Reichelt
Er steht immer an der Seite «der Juden», vertreten durch Chabad Lubawitch / Rabbi Teichtal. Völlig egal was «die Juden» machen.
Wenn «die Juden» den Iran hassen, hasst Reichelt natürlich mit: t.me/fedfs/14218 / t.me/fedfs/14216
Wenn «die Juden» einen Genozid an Palästinensern verüben, findet Reichelt das natürlich gut: t.me/fedfs/13618
Wenn «die Juden» vom deutschen Steuerzahle…
"Don't fuck with the Jews": Reichelt rät Arabern, "die Deutschen zu fragen"
Der "NIUS"-Chef Julian Reichelt bezeichnet im Podcast "Ben ungeskriptet" die palästinensische Gesellschaft als fanatisiert. Dabei zieht er direkte Vergleiche zur deutschen Geschichte während des Nationalsozialismus sowie zu den Luftangriffen auf Dresden im Zweiten Weltkrieg.
Die damalige Bombardierung sei zwar brutal gewesen, aber kein Völk…
200'000 Menschen demonstrierten in Amsterdam gegen den Landraub, die israelische Besatzung und den Völkermord in Gaza
dutchnews.nl/2026/11/thousands-gather-for-red-line-gaza-protest-in-amsterdam/
aljazeera.com/news/2026/11/8/hundreds-of-thousands-protesters-storm-amsterdam
Ich stehe ein für eine gerechtere Welt!
Folgt mir auf Telegram:
t.me/fedfs
Rollstuhlfahrer in London festgenommen - auf Grundlage von Terrorismusgesetz
Die britische Polizei nahm vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof in London einen jungen Mann im Rollstuhl «auf Grundlage von Terrorismusgesetzen» fest. Dies nachdem er öffentlich seine Unterstützung für «Palestine Action» bekundete.
Die Festnahme erfolgte, während im Gerichtsgebäude eine Berufungsverhandlung stattfand, in der das von der Regierung …
⭐ DER COVID SCHUSS IST EINE BIOWAFFE 🔥
Am 30. Januar 2025 wurde der Tod von Professor Francis Boyle gemeldet, einem Experten für Biowaffen und Anwalt für Menschenrechte –, und zwar drei Wochen nachdem er angekündigt hatte, gegen Bill Gates und den CEO von Pfizer, Albert Bourla, aussagen zu wollen.
Boyle hatte öffentlich erklärt, er beabsichtige darzulegen, dass es sich bei den COVID-19-Impfstoffen um Biowaffen hand…
Zuerst verliert die Schweiz die Souveränität und dann den Wohlstand!
Ganze Rede von Beat Rieder: https://josefender.ch/euvertr
#josefender #EUVerträge #BilateraleIII #DynamischeRechtsübernahme #Souveränität #Schweiz
Nicht einmal das Britische Empire hat von seinen Kolonien verlangt, was die EU von der Schweiz verlangt!
Ganze Rede von Beat Rieder: https://josefender.ch/euvertr
#josefender #EUVerträge #BilateraleIII #DynamischeRechtsübernahme #Souveränität #Schweiz
Internationalsozialismus
Hitler mit dem Nationalsozialismus war gestern. Heute sind wir weiter, beim Internationalsozialismus.
Ich stehe ein für eine gerechtere Welt!
Folgt mir auf Telegram:
t.me/fedfs
Ukrainisches «Rekrutierungszentrum»
So sieht das Rekrutierungszentrum für die in Dnipro Mobilisierten aus.
Ich stehe ein für eine gerechtere Welt!
Folgt mir auf Telegram:
t.me/fedfs
Die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika (USA) waren seit ihrer Unabhängigkeit im Jahr 1776 in der überwiegenden Mehrheit ihrer Geschichte in bewaffnete Konflikte, Militäroperationen oder Kriege verwickelt.
Statistiken zufolge befanden sich die USA in ihrer rund 250-jährigen Geschichte nur in etwa 20 Jahren völlig im Frieden; das bedeutet, sie waren in über 220 bis 230 Jahren an irgendeiner Art von militärischem Konflikt…
Nur wenige verstehen das.
Ich stehe ein für eine gerechtere Welt!
Folgt mir auf Telegram:
t.me/fedfs
💯25👏5
Showing the 12 most recent of 91 posts we hold for @fedfs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Dr. Daniele Ganser @DanieleGanser · 73,294 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Bernie aus Australien 🇦🇺 ®™ @bernie006 · 32,307 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 4 September 2026
Geistheiler Sananda Offizieller Kanal @geistheilersananda · 26,383 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 12 September 2026
Ärzte für Aufklärung offiziell @aerztefueraufklaerungoffiziell · 79,048 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Philipp Kruse, Rechtsanwalt @philippkruse · 21,898 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 September 2026
Ernst Wolff & andere ausgewählte Inhalte - Support Channel inofficial @ernstwolff · 21,588 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 September 2026
Matthias Langwasser Offiziell @matthiaslangwasser · 63,652 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 21 August 2026
Prof.Dr.Stefan Hockertz Original Wissenschaft @ProfHockertz · 54,152 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
Legitim.ch @LegitimNews · 59,487 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 August 2026
PHANTOM - SCHWEIZ 👔 @PhantomSchweiz · 60,955 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 August 2026
Traugott Ickeroth - Der Sturm ist da! @ti_origin · 23,415 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 18 September 2026
🇨🇭QS24 | Schweizer Gesundheitsfernsehen - Eine Perspektive mehr Gesundheit & Persönlichkeitsentwicklung. @QS24_tv · 27,070 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 September 2026
Simone Voss - EINE LEHRERIN STEHT AUF- @simonevoss · 39,778 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 11 September 2026
ALLES ÜBER DIE NWO, WHO, WEF, UN, EU, GREAT RESET, CO2 KLIMAWANDELLÜGE, CORONA PLANDEMIE @horst250936 · 24,820 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 September 2026
Reiner Fuellmich 🇩🇪/🇦🇹/🇨🇭 @ReinerFuellmich · 89,285 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 August 2026
Schwurblerhumor😁 @schwurblerhumor · 38,507 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
WAS WIRKLICH IST - ENDE DER TÄUSCHUNG @waswirklichist · 59,522 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 August 2026
Wissen ist Macht offiziell @wissenistmacht1 · 33,004 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 4 September 2026
Neverforgetniki @neverforgetnikiblog · 32,328 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 September 2026
Chemtrails/Haarp/Wettermanipulation @KanalChemtrailsHaarp · 35,946 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 September 2026
𝙳𝙴𝚁 𝟷𝟽. 𝚂𝚃𝙰𝙼𝙼𝚃𝙸𝚂𝙲𝙷 𝙺𝙰𝙽𝙰𝙻 💛💥 @der17stammtisch · 39,477 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 30 August 2026
FREQUENCY HUB 〰️, @Frequency_Hub · 34,969 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
Dr. Michael Spitzbart @drspitzbart · 67,908 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 August 2026
LION Media TV @LIONMediaTV · 102,727 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 66 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Shipi” (@fedfs), 9,788 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fedfs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.