Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Alexander Raue - Vermietertagebuch

Channel

Alexander Raue - Vermietertagebuch

@alexanderraue_offiziell

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

13,381subscribers

-115 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001929214907
TypeChannel
Username@alexanderraue_offiziell
DescriptionDas ist meine neue offizielle Telegram Gruppe
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/alexanderraue_offiziell

Topic

Real estate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,38113,51913,4506 August 2026 — 13,496 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,496 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,497 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,498 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,493 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,497 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,496 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,501 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,505 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,502 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,513 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,510 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,513 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,519 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,511 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,497 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,493 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,502 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,503 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,506 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,513 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,509 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,504 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,505 subscribers4 September 2026 — 13,503 subscribers10 September 2026 — 13,507 subscribers12 September 2026 — 13,506 subscribers15 September 2026 — 13,509 subscribers29 September 2026 — 13,491 subscribers5 October 2026 — 13,482 subscribers9 October 2026 — 13,468 subscribers13 October 2026 — 13,466 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,463 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,459 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,453 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,448 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,441 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,445 subscribers21 October 2026 — 13,447 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13,443 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,446 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,444 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,438 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,439 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,437 subscribers28 October 2026 — 13,431 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,432 subscribers30 October 2026 — 13,425 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,421 subscribers2 November 2026 — 13,420 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,409 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,405 subscribers5 November 2026 — 13,402 subscribers6 November 2026 — 13,399 subscribers7 November 2026 — 13,390 subscribers8 November 2026 — 13,387 subscribers10 November 2026 — 13,381 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 96 days, net -115. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,360–13,540 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 00:3913,381-6
8 Nov 2026, 12:1613,387-3
7 Nov 2026, 07:3513,390-9
6 Nov 2026, 05:4513,399-3
5 Nov 2026, 03:0813,402-3
4 Nov 2026, 02:4013,405-4
3 Nov 2026, 03:5013,409-11
2 Nov 2026, 02:2113,420-1
1 Nov 2026, 02:2713,421-4
30 Oct 2026, 01:4813,425-7
29 Oct 2026, 04:5713,432+1
28 Oct 2026, 02:3813,431-6
27 Oct 2026, 00:4913,437-2
25 Oct 2026, 23:5513,439+1
25 Oct 2026, 01:3613,438-6
24 Oct 2026, 02:1813,444-2
23 Oct 2026, 00:2613,446+3
22 Oct 2026, 02:2813,443-4
21 Oct 2026, 00:2813,447+2
19 Oct 2026, 20:5413,445first reading

Engagement

128 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.5%
avg views ÷ 13,381 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,490
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 128 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held128 (28 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total174,977
Reactions total4,739
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 07:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈106
Videos
≈74
Links
≈2,860

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

17,079 reactions across 125 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,72221.8%
🤮2,89216.9%
🔥2,88516.9%
🤬2,28013.3%
🤔1,4918.73%
😁1,1906.97%
❤7704.51%
👏6693.92%
😱4142.42%
🙏2321.36%
👎1310.767%
😢1200.703%
🎉1170.685%
🥰860.504%
🤯800.468%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 128 of the 128 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,510 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 128 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 39 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 16:54 UTC≈2,480 views110 reactionsread 10 November 2026

https://youtu.be/u9Enel3Ii08

🔥56😁40❤5🤮5👍2👏1🤔1

9 Nov 2026, 14:56 UTC≈2,650 views92 reactionsread 10 November 2026

https://youtu.be/5RLwlnOwXTw

🔥60🤮18👎5❤3🤔3🤬2👍1

9 Nov 2026, 05:05 UTC≈3,260 views149 reactionsread 10 November 2026

https://youtu.be/sh7gPv0ecy0

🤮116😁14🤔11👍3❤2🤯2🙏1

8 Nov 2026, 16:53 UTC≈3,380 views156 reactionsread 10 November 2026

https://youtu.be/87IVQvF4W5Y

🤮95🤬30👍15🔥4🤔4❤3😁2😢2

8 Nov 2026, 15:03 UTC≈3,340 views100 reactionsread 10 November 2026

https://youtu.be/qHV9ZHyPpNc

🤔72🤬20🔥5❤3

8 Nov 2026, 06:37 UTC≈3,510 views107 reactionsread 10 November 2026

https://youtu.be/Bn4kTjP4fZQ

🔥78😢19👍4🤔4😁1😱1

7 Nov 2026, 16:39 UTC≈3,860 views141 reactionsread 10 November 2026

https://youtu.be/a7AQViWrEsU

👍115❤16🙏6🤔4

7 Nov 2026, 05:04 UTC≈3,690 views147 reactionsread 10 November 2026

https://youtu.be/jlWnUJ60W8s

🔥65🤮56🤬18❤2😁2😱2👏1🤔1

6 Nov 2026, 17:42 UTC≈3,690 views133 reactionsread 10 November 2026

https://youtu.be/PaGL83EFVXw

👏97🤔15😁13❤5🙏3

6 Nov 2026, 05:56 UTC≈4,120 views162 reactionsread 10 November 2026

https://youtu.be/BKZSrRJWVx0

🤬123🤮23🔥8❤4🤔2👍1😢1

5 Nov 2026, 17:49 UTC≈3,840 views123 reactionsread 10 November 2026

https://youtu.be/DCBuPhm9ibA

🤔86👍18🙏7🎉6❤3👎2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 128 posts we hold for @alexanderraue_offiziell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Politik Spezial
@PolitikSpezial · 26,550
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 September 2026
Digitaler Chronist
@DigitalChronist · 29,130
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
Achtung, Reichelt!
@AchtungReichelt · 21,386
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 September 2026
JUNGE FREIHEIT
@JUNGE_FREIHEIT_Official · 20,149
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q128033457 on Wikidata, read 8 November 2026
LabelAlexander Raue
X / Twitter@alexander_raue
YouTubeUCiTJladOHCMkKndVBsn23VQ
Official sitehttps://alexander-raue.com/

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Alexander Raue - Vermietertagebuch” (@alexanderraue_offiziell), 13,381 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alexanderraue_offiziell.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.