Channel
@AtticusWierix
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,479subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001726992194 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AtticusWierix |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AtticusWierix |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:29 | 6,479 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:21 | 6,483 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 6,486 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 6,485 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 6,485 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 May 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 17,660 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
При такой структуре ты год за годом растёшь, в белую, с декларациями о доходе. Портфель и интрадей-баланс пополняются за счёт твоих навыков и исследований, без внешних вливаний. Оптимизируешь то, что можно оптимизировать, и, как и все, в сложные времена терпишь убытки, только значительно ниже, чем поймав лузстрик. Это непопулярная история, так как требует времени и терпения. Зачастую куда проще пару копеек на бинанс…
И на самом деле достаточно любопытный этап. Последние лет 5 я придерживался простой, понятной и примитивной структуры: интрадей-профит сплитовался 70/20/10 (иногда 60/30/10), где меньший кусок оставался на балансе, средний на жизнь, а больший на портфель. При соблюдении DCA и вложениях только в SPY годовая была бы около 17%, а общая под 65%. Но, но, all in это хай риск, на который идут только отчаянные и криптоюзеры…
Каждый раз на ATH одни и те же ощущения. Вроде и портфельчик растёт, а с другой стороны, за последние 10 дней ничего не заинтрадил. Чувство зажравшегося безработного, хехе. Скорее всего, при 8k SPX выйду в кэш на 70%, долгосрочные OKTA-подобные истории так и будут болтаться на балансе, пока не наступит их время. Какие-то ETF-ы вроде VXUS буду закрывать в ближайшие дни. Это был safe bet на всё, что не США, учитывая…
"Я начал изучать a, b, c, но есть ощущение, что этого будет мало для старта торговли". Пару недель назад я написал лонгрид в ответ, и, наверное, послевкусие у каждого будет своё - в зависимости от того, каким вы видите стакан.
😭😭😭 The feed is designed for organizations "most impacted by the cost of a delay in information", such as algorithmic trading firms, the company said in a statement. "Until now... firms that prioritize tracking influential Truth posts have relied on manual monitoring. Truth API closes the gap." https://www.reuters.com/technology/trump-media-unveils-data-feed-businesses-tracking-truth-social-posts-2026-07-16/
Возвращаясь к предложению. Я по таким ссылочкам не клацаю и вам не советую, но судя по описанию, есть подозрения, что там Клодом написанная платформа а-ля “сделай как у профессионалов”, надпись типа "следить за позициями фондов", подписка (раз предлагают другим это форсить) и подгрузка абсолютно ненужных для интрадея COT-данных Таких клод-гениев пол-твиттера. Но если я не прав и там нечто неординарное, уникальное, …
Но, допустим, верим Ларри Вильямсу. Нужно копнуть, что это за супер репорты такие. А вдруг там есть что-то, чего не видят остальные? Обьясняю простыми словами. Есть биржа фьючерсов, где торгуют не реальным товаром, а, по сути, обещаниями купить или продать в будущем. Участников можно разделить на два основных лагеря - реальный бизнес и спекулянты. Реальный бизнес зачастую просто хочет защититься от скачков цены. Н…
Спасибо, нинада. Но это достаточно интересно. Нет-нет, речь не об “аналитической платформе для трейдеров”, это заведомо очко в любом исполнении, речь о подходе. Подозреваю, начальной точкой возврата интереса к COT-репортам стало интервью Ларри Вильямса в октябре 2025-го, где важность COT прямо подчёркивается. Вильямс? Тот самый гений, сделавший из $10k примерно $1.1mln во время 1987 World Cup Championship of Futur…
Повседневность сейчас такая: кто-то нарабатывает себе индикаторы и выстраивает вокруг них стратегии, кто-то запрыгивает в лидборды каких-то пропок, но в основном все готовятся к летне-осеннему периоду. Оно и понятно: сентябрь зачастую как та футболка в шкафу - если после летних обжираловок влез, значит до конца года выдержит. Хорошо отсеивает стратегии, попавшие под череду удач. По VIX1D: при значении около 8 девять…
Photo, posted without a caption
SPCX это, конечно, круто, но открытие оказалось настолько неинтересным, что примерно через 0.001 секунды после Opening Bell было принято самое рациональное решение.
Видим потенциал в ADSK на long-term, бьём в сектор на который приходится 13% мирового ВВП. Приятного чтения!
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AtticusWierix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 156,199 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Atticus” (@AtticusWierix), 6,479 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AtticusWierix.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.