Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Тиджой

Channel

Тиджой

@tijoe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,617subscribers

-55 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001077771617
TypeChannel
Username@tijoe
DescriptionМой личный блог про все на свете и рогалики, конечно.
Created17 October 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held18
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tijoe

Growth

22,61722,67222,644.56 August 2026 — 22,672 subscribers6 August 2026 — 22,672 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,670 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,665 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,659 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,652 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,644 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,636 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,639 subscribers16 August 2026 — 22,642 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,638 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,642 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,635 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,628 subscribers21 August 2026 — 22,627 subscribers22 August 2026 — 22,628 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,629 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,617 subscribers6 August 202625 August 2026
18 measurements spanning 19 days, net -55. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,609–22,680 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 16:2822,617-12
24 Aug 2026, 17:2422,629+1
22 Aug 2026, 23:4922,628+1
21 Aug 2026, 14:4522,627-1
20 Aug 2026, 13:0622,628-7
19 Aug 2026, 16:3322,635-7
18 Aug 2026, 17:2222,642+4
17 Aug 2026, 16:2522,638-4
16 Aug 2026, 14:0622,642+3
13 Aug 2026, 10:1322,639+3
12 Aug 2026, 11:4622,636-8
11 Aug 2026, 08:4622,644-8
10 Aug 2026, 05:3622,652-7
9 Aug 2026, 02:5122,659-6
8 Aug 2026, 04:2122,665-5
7 Aug 2026, 04:1222,670-2
6 Aug 2026, 16:0022,672no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:5822,672first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
59.5%
avg views ÷ 22,617 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,500
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held30 (17 July 202624 August 2026)
Views total309,550
Reactions total5,866
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
981
Videos
59
Links
704

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
50s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,856 reactions across 30 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4,38063.9%
🔥4686.83%
🤯3775.50%
😢3745.46%
👏1902.77%
1642.39%
🌭1452.11%
😱1452.11%
🌚1321.93%
🤨881.28%
🥴871.27%
😈721.05%
🎉600.875%
👍470.686%
🤔290.423%
💩240.35%
🙏180.263%
💔170.248%
🤩140.204%
👎130.19%
4 further kinds120.175%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,856reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 30 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tijoe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 24 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC≈5,530 views150 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Пора добивать концовку в Сефирии, многие уже заждались: https://www.twitch.tv/tijoe

138🤩6🥴3🌭2😈1

22 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC≈7,580 views132 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, можно потихоньку возвращаться к стримам! Сегодня расчиллочный с разговорами, поэтому и начнем с еще одной игры про сортировку мусора в поисках коллекционных карточек. На этот раз помимо карточек там еще какие-то фигурки с костюмами будут и тематика кошкодевок. Хотелось бы еще в Сефирии на финальчик выйти, но я весьма сонный, так что обещать не буду. Заскакивайте: https://www.twitch.tv/tijoe

😱9526🔥5🌭2👎21😈1

21 Aug 2026, 21:26 UTC≈8,940 views320 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Я вспомнил... Катка в DEADBOLT уже доступна для бустеров любого тира. Через сколько-то дней опубликую на Ютубе! https://boosty.to/tijoe/posts/4c8556f1-c3e9-488c-833e-8bcc6f33d26b

🤯25448👍7🔥3🙏3🌭2😱2😈1

20 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC≈10,400 views353 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Когда заливаешь видос на Ютуб, у него начинается статус проверки, который занимает от нескольких часов до нескольких дней в редких случаях. Параллельно основному ролику, сделал очень угарную нарезку клипов, чтобы развеяться. По прошлому опыту, когда въебали 18+ решил помариновать ролик в доступе по ссылке, чтобы разминировать потенциальные нарушения. Спустя НАХУЙ 16 дней приходит 18+ :D Остается вопрос, а что вообще

😢30127💔16🌭5🔥3🤨1

17 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC≈13,000 views458 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Крысы не чистят зубы

342🥴75🔥16💩9😱6🌭5🤯3🏆2

15 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC≈14,100 views261 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

?

145🤨79🤔17🤯8😈6🔥3🙏2👎1

14 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC≈14,700 views273 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Возвращаясь к теме газированных напитков. ЧТО СТАЛО СО ВКУСОМ ФАНТЫ? У нее какое-то гадкое, сложно описуемое послевкусие. Такое даже иногда до прихода "Доброго" встречалось, а сейчас буквально каждый раз. На фотографии можно наблюдать, что бутылка нормально так испита, ну а куда деваться 🙅‍♂️

👏183😢5716😱10🌚2🤨2🤯2💔1

13 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC≈11,700 views370 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Клетка такая большая, что в нее можно засунуть маленькую клетку

311🔥38🌭12👍53🏆1

13 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC≈11,900 views500 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Крысы переехали в хоромы

399🔥53🎉28😱14👍32👎1

13 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC≈11,200 views122 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

Всем приветик! Стартанем с демки раннер-шутер рогалика DEADBOOT (почти как DEADBOLT 😊). Затем скорее всего перекатимся в еще одну похожую игру и может шлифанем Сефирией: https://www.twitch.tv/tijoe

95😱14🔥4🌭2👎2🤯2😁2😈1

12 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC≈10,100 views360 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Помните как раньше быть школьником было неловко в интернете и крутые юзеры троллили школоту за то, что те ходят в школку и тупые пиздец? Было нормальной практикой свой возвраст скрывать, особенно в ММО. Нихуево так все поменялось, что теперь над скуфами потешаются. Пару дней назад видос Константина Кадавра смотрел где он сокрушался на слово "скуф" и походу ролик уже скрыт. Не всякий школьник — школота, но всякая шко

325😈18🌭14🤔2🌚1

12 Aug 2026, 05:38 UTC≈12,400 views231 reactions2 Starsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Как же проблематично стало выбирать газяву из-за санкций и введения акциза. Все какое-то невкусное + маленьких объемов. Недавно попробовал Баскин Роббинс молочный, похоже на милкис, с черникой самый вкусный, остальные на разочек попробовать. Раньше такие приколы чисто под разбавление алкоголя рассматривал, а теперь что... на каждый день слишком дорого!

192🌭239👍4🌚2🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @tijoe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,029,019 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Obsidian Time
@obsitgroup · 56,758
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Тиджой” (@tijoe), 22,617 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tijoe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.