Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 62 days, net -497. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55,243–56,152 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Oct 2026, 11:55
55,550
+13
24 Oct 2026, 09:08
55,537
-11
23 Oct 2026, 10:27
55,548
+2
22 Oct 2026, 13:49
55,546
+19
21 Oct 2026, 09:50
55,527
+16
20 Oct 2026, 07:11
55,511
+53
18 Oct 2026, 02:11
55,458
+24
17 Oct 2026, 00:06
55,434
+8
15 Oct 2026, 22:28
55,426
+21
14 Oct 2026, 21:46
55,405
-9
13 Oct 2026, 17:41
55,414
-18
9 Oct 2026, 22:17
55,432
-44
5 Oct 2026, 19:00
55,476
+23
30 Sept 2026, 09:21
55,453
+105
18 Sept 2026, 06:18
55,348
-7
16 Sept 2026, 02:59
55,355
-1
14 Sept 2026, 08:58
55,356
-31
12 Sept 2026, 15:21
55,387
-19
10 Sept 2026, 17:40
55,406
-117
7 Sept 2026, 15:20
55,523
first reading
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 15 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 124 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.58%
avg views ÷ 55,550 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,320
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 37 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 October 2026
Posts held
37 (15 August 2026 – 18 October 2026)
Views total
53,230
Reactions total
565
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Oct 2026, 09:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
9m 35s
Average length
1m 12s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,117 reactions across 36 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,050
49.6%
🔥
665
31.4%
❤🔥
225
10.6%
👍
73
3.45%
⚡
59
2.79%
🦄
17
0.803%
😈
9
0.425%
😢
8
0.378%
🤔
6
0.283%
🆒
2
0.094%
😁
2
0.094%
😎
1
0.047%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,117 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2026 to 18 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 36 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nikita_yudaev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 37 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 August 2026 to 18 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Что делать, когда клиент просит сделать «красиво и минималистично»?
У каждого своё представление о красивом дизайне. Для одного — чёрный фон, золото и анимации, для другого — воздух, спокойная типографика и минимум деталей
Если сразу идти рисовать, придётся угадывать желания клиента. А это часто заканчивается бесконечными правками
Поэтому сначала обсуждаем, потом рисуем
— Попросите клиента показать 3–5 референсов…
Как понять, когда стоит поднимать чек
Год назад делал лендинги за 20 тысяч, отработал ещё год, значит, пора просить 40. Логика понятна, но клиенту неважно, сколько ты в профессии. Он платит за результат и за проблему, которую ты закрываешь.
Вот по каким признакам я бы смотрел, что пора расти:
1. Задачи стали сложнее
Раньше собирал интерфейс по готовому ТЗ. Теперь сам разбираешься в продукте, предлагаешь решения и …
💚 Хорошие новости!
Мы частично восстановили работу марафонов!
Теперь вы снова можете проходить наши марафоны, но пока только через Telegram
Мы продолжаем работать над полным восстановлением всех функций и обязательно сообщим об изменениях
⚡️ Присоединяйтесь к марафону!
Ссылка на регистрацию
Друзья, к сожалению, у нас возникли технические сложности, из-за которых временно недоступны многие функции бота
Мы уже работаем над решением проблемы и делаем всё возможное, чтобы восстановить работу как можно быстрее
Как только всё заработает, мы обязательно сразу вам сообщим! ❤️
Приносим извинения за временные неудобства и благодарим за ваше терпение и понимание! 🙏
Дарю гайд, который сильно упростит работу с клиентами
Если бы у меня была такая инфа в начале пути, я бы был суперменом)
Там 10 шагов в коммуникации с клиентом, которые помогут вам зарабатывать в х2 больше. Узнаете: как общаться, чтобы вам не давали по 150 правок, как защищать свои права и договорённости и, самое главное, как оставить у заказчика только положительные впечатления от вашей работы
Решил отдавать его …
Как ускорить работу в фигме несколькими клавишами
Показал в ролике комбинации, которые упрощают процессы и помогают меньше отвлекаться на рутину
Сохраняйте, пригодится каждому дизайнеру 👌
Дайджест по каналу!
Ребят, чтобы вам было удобнее находить конкретный пост, собрал всё в одном месте
Будет удобно и новеньким, которые только зашли в канал, и тем, кто давно меня читает
🔥 Дайджест я буду регулярно обновлять и добавлять ещё полезную инфу, накопленную здесь за несколько месяцев
Игры и тесты по дизайну
- Наша крутая игра «Дизайн тиндер» для прокачки насмотренности
- Тест для тех, кто только присматр…
Реально ли с работы HR перейти в коммерческий дизайн с нуля?
Сейчас очень многие топят за идею веры в себя. Не, она, конечно, тоже решает при поиске проектов. Но только одной веры недостаточно, особенно когда на одного заказчика сейчас сотни желающих дизов.
И Даша, наша студентка, нашла проект благодаря офигенному упорству и множеству попыток, даже когда не чувствовала уверенности в своих силах.
До дизайна она раб…
Свайпай и получай гранты 🔥
В сентябре я давал вам много инфы про базу в дизайне. И сейчас самое время закрепить это на практике, чтобы вы сами могли открыть чужой макет и понять: что в нём хорошо, а что не так.
Всё просто:
👍🏻 свайп вправо – дизайн хороший
👎🏻 свайп влево – дизайн плохой
После каждого ответа сразу есть объяснение, почему дизайн работает или нет. Так вы быстрее начнете замечать удачные решения в дру…
Замечали такое, что дизайн выглядит классно, но с ним все равно что-то не так?
Частая тут проблема, что в макете учли всё, кроме колористики..
Рассказал в карточках про цветовой круг – простую шпаргалку, которая помогает понять, какие цвета сочетаются между собой, и как собрать из них палитру.
Если только начинаете в дизайне, не пытайтесь добавить в макет пять разных цветов. Начните с двух. Так гораздо проще собра…
Чем отличается дорогой дизайн от дешевого
Гайс! Записал вот такой короткий ролик для вас по базе в дизайне
Да, стоит чуть поправить композицию, типографику или колористику, и макет уже будет выглядеть гораздо лучше
Обязательно сохраните и поставьте огонечки, если узнали что-то новое или освежили в памяти🔥
🔥54❤14👍7😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @nikita_yudaev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@nikita_yudaev edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
7 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
unid | графический дизайн @unid_gd · 40,155 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
Здесь про Figma @Figma_dsgn · 48,371 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
Здесь про Photoshop @Photoshop_dsgn · 40,054 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
design teacher | Туториалы для дизайнеров @dsgn_teacher · 48,120 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Никита Юдаев о дизайне” (@nikita_yudaev), 55,550 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nikita_yudaev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.