Channel
@studioslow
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
20,174subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001231967718 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @studioslow |
| Description | Бренды завтрашнего дня. Локально — в Москве, Петербурге и Казани, доставляем по всей России — studioslow.ru. По всем вопросам пишите @studiosloww. youtube.com/@StudioSloww |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/studioslow |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 20,174 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 20,169 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 20,172 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 20,166 | +6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 20,160 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 20,161 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 22,564 |
| Reactions total | 753 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 23:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
527 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5411552775987284743 | 217 | 41.2% | |
| 🔥 | 117 | 22.2% | |
| 💔 | 90 | 17.1% | |
| 💯 | 73 | 13.9% | |
| 🌭 | 27 | 5.12% | |
| 😈 | 3 | 0.569% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 753reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вдохновленные футбольными бутсами, дизайнеры Magliano и VEJA концентрируют внимание на перфорированном язычке кед ⚽️ Благодаря этому преувеличению и асимметричной шнуровке силуэт Paneka обрел новое звучание, а три комплекта шнурков позволяют менять настроение пары — ведь игра продолжается и за пределами поля.
🔥12custom 541155277598728474310💯9
Вещь дня: Узнаваемые spiked-проявления MADFRENZY в этот раз предстали в форме сумки. Темный силуэт, усеянный мягкими шипами, не забывает и про свою игривую сторону, являя миру обвесы с леденцами, звездами и фирменной цепью ⛓️💥
custom 541155277598728474314🔥8💔7🌭3
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 541155277598728474312🔥10💔9🌭2
Отправляясь на променад, каждая it-girl завершает сотворенный образ сумочкой 🤩 Вот и силуэты MARGESHERWOOD, замеченные в разных уголках города, предстали в роли бесценных спутников своих обладательниц.
💔13🔥11🌭9custom 54115527759872847439💯3
Во вселенной KidSuper даже такие повседневные задачи, как доставка посылок, не обходятся без волшебства. В реальность воплощаются удивительные фантазии: рисунки, звезды и рукописные заметки оживают в образе героя, перенося сказку The Boy Who Jumped the Moon в настоящую жизнь 😟
custom 541155277598728474313💯9🔥9🌭2
Шлейф женственности, исходящий от нашей подруги Юлии, словно окутывает все пространство ✨ Загадочную ауру подчеркивает скульптурное платье Mugler: его выразительные изгибы раскрывают одновременно чувственность и внутреннюю силу.
custom 541155277598728474318💔11🔥10💯2
Режиссерская работа, проделанная нами в ходе наблюдения за героями STUDIO SLOW × FAKOSHIMA, подтверждает эффект перевоплощения — видеоряд сменяют маски с оправами, преобразившие образы друзей проекта 👍
custom 541155277598728474326🔥17💯11😈1
Погружаемся в механизм творческого промысла Studio Slow 🐦⬛ В бекстейдже съемки Ann Demeulemeester родилась идентичность самого бренда — от первых идей до финального воплощения.
custom 541155277598728474318🔥13💔7
Устраиваем воскресную интерьерную паузу, чтобы оказаться в стенах офиса thom/krom в Берлине 🟤 Таким мы и представляли себе место силы бренда: сдержанным, почти аскетичным, в котором ничто не отвлекает от главного — рождения идей.
custom 541155277598728474310💔8🔥8
«Ann Demeulemeester подчеркнул атмосферу самых легендарных треков. В чем еще можно было начинать Number One Fan?» Так о подготовке к стадионному концерту Димы Билана рассказывает наш друг Рамиль Шакирзянов, взявший на себя ответственность за стилизацию образа артиста в тот вечер. Вглядываемся в кадры и убеждаемся в супремативности жакетов бельгийской королевы авангарда 🤲
custom 541155277598728474330💯14💔10🌭5🔥5😈2
LAST CALL на позицию продавца-стилиста в Studio Slow — принимаем последние отклики до завтра, 9 августа, поторопитесь 🏃♂️ Заглавными задачами станут стилизация образов и обеспечение наилучшего сервиса для гостей магазина в Санкт-Петербурге. Ждем резюме и сопроводительное письмо от всех заинтересованных в Telegram.
custom 541155277598728474314💯10💔7
В перерывах между работой и общением с гостями наши стилисты устраивают фотографические очерки 🤩 Для них, увлекающихся снимками и выхватыванием загадочных деталей из реальности, новинки — бесконечный источник визуальных сюжетов и скрытых историй.
custom 541155277598728474318💯8💔7🌭2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @studioslow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 13,338 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Studio Slow” (@studioslow), 20,174 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/studioslow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.