Channel
@filtih
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,303subscribers
-40 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001307576692 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @filtih |
| Description | контент, польза, вдохновение, инсайты и приколы создатель - ilyafiltih (инст) |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/filtih |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 9,303 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 9,301 | -8 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 9,309 | -23 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:48 | 9,332 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 9,342 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 9,343 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:29 | 9,343 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (25 July 2026 – 18 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,320 |
| Reactions total | 240 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
259 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5344040043327531762 | 241 | 93.1% | |
| 💔 | 11 | 4.25% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 2.70% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 259reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
никогда не думал, что я это скажу, но я полюбил треки Ланы💔 вот эти - это прям мясо. У меня огромный прилив вдохновения от них *уже жду, как буду их слушать в Париже **до этого я очень не любил данную исполнительницу. Прям очень
custom 534404004332753176220
Вообще, день примерно такой Мальдивы заходят очень. Сегодня еще была лучшая погода за все дни пребывания здесь Может, что-то конкретное интересно про Мальдивы? Или просто кидать фотки?)
custom 534404004332753176226💔11💯3
Прикиньте, здесь включить влоги Сережи и Синяка - просветить Мальдивы, так скажем 🫦 *это один из видов развлечения на острове: заказать просмотр фильм на берегу океана
custom 534404004332753176218
🌞
custom 534404004332753176250
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 534404004332753176252
какие работы обязательно должны быть на странице креатора⤵️ ни одно творчество, никакой «прикол» не продаст вас брендам лучше, чем качественно сделанная коммерческая работа для бренда под качественно сделанной подразумевается: - полное попадание в бренд - качественная передача изделий до малейшего шва, посадки, фактуры ткани - уникальная модель, созданная с нуля с учетом типажности - сохранение персонажа, локации, …
custom 534404004332753176221💯4
рубрика «как я провел выходные» или моя вторая личность🐸 во мне чудесным образом уживается два персонажа (даже больше, но сегодн про этих двоих): 1. Человек-машина, который дисциплинированно много работает, ходит в зал, ежедневно считает каждый грамм еды и все в этом духе - вы знакомы 2. Тот самый дядя, у которого все потихоньку. Или, знаете, та самая мамина подруга-праздник, идеальная и которая живет как в послед…
custom 534404004332753176235
смотрим и обсуждаем новый кампейн miu miu 📷 Хейли Бибер как лицо бренда с одной стороны - снято стильно, со второй - мне скучно, с третьей - может, уже отстать от брендов с ожиданиями перепрыгнуть себя снова и снова? что вообще думаете? Мне кажется, настолько мы стали избалованные, что удивлять и удивляться получается все реже. И, возможно, дело то уже не в том, что бренды уже не могут что-то придумать, а мы уже х…
custom 534404004332753176219
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @filtih. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FILTIH” (@filtih), 9,303 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/filtih.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.