Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

SASAVOT 26+

@sasavot

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

342,309subscribers

+886 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001791088657
TypeChannel
Username@sasavot
Descriptiontwitch.tv/sasavot 📺
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sasavot

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

341,168342,468341,8187 August 2026 — 341,423 subscribers7 August 2026 — 341,341 subscribers9 August 2026 — 341,168 subscribers10 August 2026 — 342,066 subscribers10 August 2026 — 342,286 subscribers11 August 2026 — 342,460 subscribers12 August 2026 — 342,468 subscribers13 August 2026 — 342,309 subscribers342,3097 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +886. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 340,973–342,663 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 23:18342,309-159
12 Aug 2026, 19:54342,468+8
11 Aug 2026, 21:35342,460+174
10 Aug 2026, 23:06342,286+220
10 Aug 2026, 02:32342,066+898
9 Aug 2026, 00:52341,168-173
7 Aug 2026, 23:04341,341-82
7 Aug 2026, 12:15341,423first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.1%
avg views ÷ 342,309 subscribers
Avg views / post
168,000
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held29 (24 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total4,871,200
Reactions total112,251
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 20:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,110
Videos
261
Links
442

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 10s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

112,251 reactions across 29 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍81,01572.2%
🤣23,59021.0%
👎7,6466.81%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112,251reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC≈45,000 views3,084 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

сегодня без вкл ✌️

👎2,130👍715🤣239

13 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈83,500 views2,146 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

вкл 19:00 - 19:30 🤖

👍1,810🤣239👎97

12 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC≈99,700 views2,420 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

вкл 17:40 - 18:20 🏞

👍2,140🤣199👎81

11 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC≈129,000 views5,845 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

👍3,950👎1,250🤣645

11 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC≈154,000 views15,568 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Подстригся ✂️ , теперь больше не канадка , как эта прическа называется ?

🤣11,000👍4,180👎388

10 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC≈150,000 views5,006 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

сегодня без вкл, ток проснулся , буду пробовать как то ресать режим сна , ну и почитаю воздушный интернет 🧐

👍4,050🤣666👎290

10 Aug 2026, 01:44 UTC≈163,000 views8,055 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

С разбаном получается ☕️

👍7,020🤣863👎172

9 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC≈175,000 views3,401 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

ВКЛ ИРЛ 17:00 - 18:00 ⛳️

👍2,950🤣352👎99

8 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC≈179,000 views2,229 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

вкл 19:50 - 20:10 😎

👍2,020🤣135👎74

7 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC≈174,000 views3,397 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

сегодня без вкл , очки приехали щас буду тестить/проверять , +еще с гольфом ирл на воскресенья решаю вопрос 🙋

👍2,840👎339🤣218

6 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC≈175,000 views3,829 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

вкл 18:50 - 19:10 📦

👍2,870🤣871👎88

5 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC≈167,000 views2,450 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

вкл 18:30 - 19:00 ☕️

👍2,180🤣188👎82

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @sasavot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 204,422 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Spokoynich
@spokoynich228 · 118,109
#1
heliN139 💀
@heleNyssss · 123,115
#2
EVELONE 1️⃣9️⃣2️⃣
@evelone192gg · 1,125,221
#3
STREAM INSIDE
@streaminside · 264,526
#4
Ликс
@dmlixxx · 367,508
#5
Exile
@exilemusic13 · 1,423,856
#6
Строго крут
@strogo2288 · 48,393
#7
Кореш
@koreshzy · 831,658
#8
des0ut
@des0ut · 36,360
#9
ДАНИЛА ГОРИЛЛА 🦍
@danila_gorilla · 646,628
#10
Renatko и Шачир
@renatkotv · 199,322
#11
ZLOYn
@zloy · 198,283
#12
Спальня Деда
@jesusavgntwitch · 147,359
#13
uglyfacekid
@uglyfacekkk · 214,877
#14
Морфи или мерфи?
@morpheyaa · 185,722
#15
KISHKI FAMILY
@kishkiFM · 40,067
#16
Бустер 🍄
@bigpencil · 1,201,856
#17
секретный тг шадоукека
@shadowkekw · 610,794
#18
Логово Внизу
@nebudetgg · 502,068
#19
korya_mc
@korya_mc · 111,449
#20
Рифмы и Панчи 🤯
@rhymestg · 1,412,119
#21
Stariy_Bog
@StariyBog · 106,880
#22
dyrachyo
@dyrachyo · 211,955
#23
by_owl
@byowl · 129,209
#24
Derzko69
@gigaderzko69 · 232,318
#25
Развлекательный канал «ЮРАПИВО»
@yurapivas · 21,340
#26
ПАРАДЕЕВИЧ
@paradeevich · 1,058,599
#27
CS2NEWS | Counter-Strike 2
@newcsgo · 579,128
#28
Nix
@nixtalk · 232,975
#29
РИМ 🕊
@rhymesrim · 302,628
#30
НМШ
@nmshhub · 707,085
#31
FREAK
@freak192 · 64,696
#32
Дневник Симпла
@s1mplegod123 · 249,842
#33
Stray Dungeon
@StrayDungeon228 · 147,407
#34
Team Spirit
@Team_Spirit_Official · 200,957
#35
милашка лизз
@iceicell_tg · 92,293
#36
mzlff
@mazellovvv · 435,745
#37
Golovach
@SerjGolovach · 79,170
#38
4ch
@why4ch · 1,062,182
#39
Dota 2
@Dota2 · 301,798
#40
Офис Стила | steel streams
@steelstaya · 215,662
#41
Кишлак
@kishlak_family · 261,291
#42
ct0m
@ct0m · 179,252
#43
Риса за Творчество / РЗТ
@risazatvorchestvo · 161,218
#44
Алексей Шевцов
@jolybells · 359,769
#45
bushido zho
@bushidozho · 192,194
#46
deko_O
@dekocsoff · 199,680
#47
Медийка
@mediyca · 715,096
#48
BUDA +
@budaog · 357,048
#49
РАЙЗ ЛАВ Ю
@raiz · 314,382
#50
MELLSTROY BONUS
@mellstroybonus · 330,124
#51
Gabe News | Dota 2
@gabenews · 147,006
#52
ТРУСЫ РАЙЗА
@raiznews · 523,860
#53
Логово Вверху (Братишкин)
@nebudetafk · 205,670
#54
Данила Кашен
@DKNASASAL · 395,198
#55
В гостях у Булыча
@bulkin_live · 922,874
#56
Scallygram
@scallymilanogram · 203,730
#57
ЛИТВИН
@litvintm · 1,591,302
#58
Zitraks stream
@zitrakstw · 18,888
#59
PLOHOY PAREN
@plohoypacan · 385,754
#60
9mice
@the9mice · 268,331
#61
Пекарня
@pekagame · 1,101,175
#62
Екатерина Мизулина
@ekaterina_mizulina · 925,565
#63

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

heliN139 💀
@heleNyssss · 123,115
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026
korya_mc
@korya_mc · 111,449
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 14 August 2026
ДенжерЛьоха 🐷
@dangerlyoha · 327,806
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 August 2026
1hp
@unohp · 207,993
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SASAVOT 26+” (@sasavot), 342,309 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sasavot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.