Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

строгочмо

@strogo228

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

461,273subscribers

-2,520 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001320582784
TypeChannel
Username@strogo228
Descriptionмой магазин - http://strogo.shop написать мне - @strogotg
Created2 October 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/strogo228

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

461,273463,793462,5336 August 2026 — 463,793 subscribers6 August 2026 — 463,714 subscribers7 August 2026 — 463,339 subscribers8 August 2026 — 462,998 subscribers9 August 2026 — 462,692 subscribers10 August 2026 — 462,178 subscribers11 August 2026 — 461,688 subscribers12 August 2026 — 461,273 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2,520. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 460,895–464,171 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 08:16461,273-415
11 Aug 2026, 09:47461,688-490
10 Aug 2026, 11:11462,178-514
9 Aug 2026, 12:35462,692-306
8 Aug 2026, 13:17462,998-341
7 Aug 2026, 11:08463,339-375
6 Aug 2026, 13:20463,714-79
6 Aug 2026, 06:31463,793first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.1%
avg views ÷ 461,273 subscribers
Avg views / post
176,000
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held22 (26 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total3,868,800
Reactions total70,364
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
764
Videos
47
Links
165

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

70,364 reactions across 22 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
47,98268.2%
💩15,12921.5%
👎2,0172.87%
😈1,9552.78%
👍1,8162.58%
😡8111.15%
😨6540.929%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70,364reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
462
across the posts below
Posts paid on
21
of 22 we hold a reading for · 95%
Most on one post
146
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @strogo228. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC≈32,300 views394 reactionsread 11 August 2026

twitch.tv/strogo ПОКАЗЫВАЮ НОВЫЕ КОВРЫ, ПОКАЗЫВАЮ НОВЫЙ ШАР, ПОКАЗЫВАЮ СКИЛ И АПАЮ 4к ЕЛО

326💩37😈12👎10😨6👍3

9 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC≈94,500 views1,180 reactions4 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Друзья в моем магазине произошел дроп новой коллекции ковриков 🌸 💙🐬 Если кому-то что-то приглянулось, можете заказать на ‼️👇‼️ strogo.shop

808💩273👍50😈36😡7👎6

5 Aug 2026, 23:07 UTC≈156,000 views1,456 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Запуск стрима в 17:00 Осталась одна игра калибровки Потом в 20:00 играем ССТ 💀🥇

1,270👍81😈53💩38👎7😡7

4 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC≈167,000 views12,154 reactions35 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сколько лайков соберет этот экспонат 👉🏻♥️ Столько ело мне завтра дадут

11,000💩701👍243👎112😈56😨26😡16

4 Aug 2026, 19:05 UTC≈157,000 views1,754 reactions12 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ВОУ ЗАВТРА ДЕНЬ ЗАВОЗ 😈

1,540💩97😈77👍21👎16😨3

3 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC≈130,000 views1,659 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @strogoMagazPhoto

😈РОЗЫГРЫШ КОВРОВ😈 😈Призы: 🥇1 место- эксклюзивный ковер с росписями Донка,Маджикса и Молодого + бейджик игрока Molodoy, PGL Astana 2026 🥈2–10 место - любой ковер из новой коллекции. 👇Дополнительный шанс выиграть👇 ❗️Сделайте репост этого поста в свой телеграмм канал - и вы автоматически станете участником отдельного розыгрыша,где случайным образом будут выбраны еще победители. ❗️❗️Бонус❗️❗️ Если ваш репост набе

1,390💩126👎52👍43😈22😨17😡9

2 Aug 2026, 21:28 UTC≈157,000 views2,155 reactions10 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня в 11:00 играем онлайн турнир Жду всех

1,880😈118😨78💩41👍20👎9😡9

1 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC≈162,000 views2,042 reactions6 Starsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @strogoMagazVideo

08.08.2026 💀

1,560💩319👍71👎38😈29😨19😡6

1 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTC≈206,000 views15,575 reactions146 Starsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

💩12,900👎1,610😡628😨203132👍52😈50

31 Jul 2026, 19:01 UTC≈199,000 views4,193 reactions16 Starsread 12 August 2026

видимо из-за волнения и перенапряга вчерашнего, чет сегодня вообще нету сил постримить, голова болела еще весь день :( Жду ваши поздравления завтра, каждому буду говорить спс ☺️

3,680👍260😨134😈46💩43👎24😡6

30 Jul 2026, 21:38 UTC≈221,000 views5,434 reactions49 Starsread 12 August 2026

вау

4,790😈342💩136👍107👎26😨22😡11

30 Jul 2026, 15:56 UTC≈221,000 views2,892 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026

ЛЕНЯ С НАМИ 😋

2,580😈168👍92😨27💩25

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @strogo228. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 106,079 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Domains linked from posts

One domainthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

twitch.tv1 post · 30 July 2026 – 30 July 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“строгочмо” (@strogo228), 461,273 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/strogo228.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.