Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Формула команды

@russiaHH

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,990subscribers

-35 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001071854605
TypeChannel
Username@russiaHH
Created10 August 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/russiaHH

Growth

7,9908,0258,007.55 August 2026 — 8,025 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,025 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,005 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,998 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,990 subscribers5 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net -35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,985–8,030 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 04:047,990-8
11 Aug 2026, 13:557,998-7
8 Aug 2026, 23:018,005-20
6 Aug 2026, 03:048,025no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:378,025first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.35%
avg views ÷ 7,990 subscribers
Avg views / post
348
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held25 (10 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total6,958
Reactions total118
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

124 reactions across 21 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3830.6%
🔥3629.0%
👍3528.2%
😢54.03%
💯43.23%
32.42%
😁32.42%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
4.00%
1 of 25 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
210
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
291
over 24 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjdkPitT16 August 20266 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC131 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚀 Бесплатный вебинар про адаптацию руководителей По данным Лондонской школы бизнеса, 39% руководителей думают об уходе в первые три месяца. При этом исследование Brandon Hall Group показало, что компании с продуманным онбордингом менеджеров удерживают их на 82% чаще. На вебинаре 18 августа разберем, как выстроить адаптацию управленцев, чем отличается их онбординг от линейных сотрудников и как распределить ответстве

🔥6

8 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC222 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

4👍1

6 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC285 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Очень схожая ситуация с той, что описывала Анна

💯4

6 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC230 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @not_typical_hr

Провальный кейс #6. Когда слишком долго надеялись, что человек изменится Я работаю HR BP в производственной компании. Несколько лет назад у нас был руководитель отдела, которого очень ценило руководство. Он отлично разбирался в своей работе, мог решить практически любую проблему и действительно тащил на себе большой объем задач. Но работать с ним было тяжело. Он не кричал и не оскорблял людей напрямую. Все выглядел

4😢2

6 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC210 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjdkPitTPhoto

Как оживить онлайн-курс? Только 10–15% учащихся успешно завершают онлайн-курсы. Почему так? Скука, отрыв от реальных задач, неудобство и неинтересность. ⚪️ 11 августа в 16:00 по МСК в прямом эфире эксперт Академии iSpring Александр Цветков покажет базовые приёмы игровых механик и примеры из игровой индустрии, которые могут стать источником идей для проектов. Вы узнаете, как подбирать игровые механики под конкретны

3

6 Aug 2026, 03:55 UTC191 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @not_typical_hrPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥5😁3

27 Jul 2026, 17:01 UTC387 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Мне семь лет казалось: чем больше хозяин отдаёт работе — субботы в запахе опилок, остывший кофе, вечера без детей, — тем крепче дело. Теперь спорю с собой: крепкий бизнес держится не на хозяине, а на порядке. Я неделю не слышу визга пилы, а цех идёт по графику и Лена закрывает сделки. 🚀 Максим

🔥5

27 Jul 2026, 10:01 UTC402 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Я больше не считаю саморазрушение признаком сильного HRD. Руководитель, который молча принимает невозможные KPI, отвечает CEO в воскресенье и закрывает собой каждую дыру, не спасает бизнес. Он приучает систему к тому, что его можно расходовать. Я была именно такой. Ушла от Виктора Петровича с одной коробкой документов и страхом, который звенел громче турникета за спиной. Впереди — ипотека, двое детей и никакой гар

👍9

25 Jul 2026, 09:22 UTC307 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @not_typical_hrPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥7

24 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC339 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Лёха закончил онбординг без меня. Я листал его материалы: зелёные стрелки, скриншоты из CRM, ни одной моей таблицы. Рядом остывал кофе. Новичок написал в общий чат: «Спасибо, теперь разобрался». Я закрыл файл. Тут от Лёхи пришло: «Ну что, Дим, где переделывать?» 👥 Дмитрий

4

24 Jul 2026, 10:00 UTC340 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Я удивлена. И от этого удивления во мне появляется очень осторожная надежда. Месяц в новой компании. Утром Алексей позвал меня в переговорку. На столе остывал чай, за стеклом кто-то торопливо стирал с доски вчерашние KPI. Он открыл блокнот и спросил: — Анна, где у нас сейчас всё буксует? Я замолчала. Внутри мгновенно включился старый сценарий: сейчас назову проблему — услышу, что HR опять ищет причины вместо резу

👍8

23 Jul 2026, 10:00 UTC334 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Мне тепло и немного неловко, когда другие замечают во мне перемены, которых я сам не чувствую. Сегодня сидели на кухне: в микроволновке пищал чей-то контейнер, у меня остывала гречка, в рабочем чате продолжали мигать тикеты. Настя вдруг сказала, что сейчас ко мне легче прийти и начать разговор. Не только когда всё уже горит. Я даже вилку отложил. Не нашёлся, что ответить. Лёха покрутил бумажный стаканчик и добавил

4👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @russiaHH. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,102,109 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Формула команды” (@russiaHH), 7,990 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/russiaHH.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.