"رصد بلوچستان" حرکت مردمی رهگیری اخبار بلوچستان٬ همسایگان و هم سرنوشت های بلوچ است.
شعار ما: شفافیت، صداقت
راه ارتباط با ادمین برای ارسال اخبار و گزارشات:
T.me/officialrasad
وبسایت:
https://rasadbalochistan.net
ایکس:
https://x.com/rasadbalochstan
Created
22 November 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 51 days, net +321. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,969–23,392 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 11:58
23,343
+161
17 Sept 2026, 10:20
23,182
+17
15 Sept 2026, 08:19
23,165
+23
13 Sept 2026, 13:40
23,142
+110
11 Sept 2026, 15:18
23,032
-9
9 Sept 2026, 00:37
23,041
+15
5 Sept 2026, 14:16
23,026
-1
1 Sept 2026, 06:03
23,027
-10
31 Aug 2026, 04:54
23,037
-6
30 Aug 2026, 01:44
23,043
-5
29 Aug 2026, 02:17
23,048
-5
28 Aug 2026, 04:56
23,053
-3
26 Aug 2026, 06:22
23,056
+1
24 Aug 2026, 06:47
23,055
-1
22 Aug 2026, 17:54
23,056
-3
21 Aug 2026, 09:42
23,059
-7
20 Aug 2026, 10:24
23,066
+6
19 Aug 2026, 11:08
23,060
+2
18 Aug 2026, 09:12
23,058
+5
17 Aug 2026, 11:04
23,053
first reading
Engagement
264 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 23,343 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,830
69 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
69
of 264 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 68 of 69 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026
Posts held
264 (2 August 2026 – 1 October 2026)
Views total
195,490
Reactions total
2,084
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Oct 2026, 10:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈17,900
Videos
≈10,300
Links
≈22,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 46m
Average length
51s
Measured directly from 125 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,888 reactions across 262 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💔
1,873
31.8%
❤
1,252
21.3%
😡
1,088
18.5%
😭
476
8.08%
👏
437
7.42%
👍
237
4.03%
🔥
227
3.86%
🤩
215
3.65%
🤣
68
1.15%
💯
8
0.136%
🙏
7
0.119%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 262 of the 264 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,888 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 264 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔹حریق گسترده در محل دپوی سوخت در زاهدان؛ چندین خودرو و اتوبوس در آتش سوختند
رصد بلوچستان؛ امروز پنجشنبه ۹ مهرماه ۱۴۰۵، یک محل دپوی سوخت در خیابان فاضلی زاهدان دچار آتشسوزی گسترده شد.
بر اساس گزارش دریافتی، در این حادثه دستکم چهار دستگاه اتوبوس و شش خودروی سواری طعمه حریق شدهاند.
نیروهای آتشنشانی در محل حضور دارند و برای مهار آتش تلاش میکنند. با این حال، در ویدیوی ارسالی، افرادی که در محل حضور دارند میگویند…
🔹قتل یک روحانی اهلسنت در نیکشهر؛ افراد مسلح ناشناس او را به رگبار بستند
رصد بلوچستان: بر اساس گزارشهای اولیه، یک روحانی اهلسنت بنام مولوی «خان محمد» امروز پس از اقامه نماز ظهر، در مقابل مسجدی در روستای تانان، دهستان مهبان، بخش مرکزی شهرستان نیکشهر، هدف تیراندازی افراد مسلح ناشناس قرار گرفت.
گفته میشود سرنشینان یک دستگاه پراید ۱۳۲ پس از نزدیکشدن به محل، او را به رگبار بستهاند که در پی این تیراندازی، این روحانی…
🔹 رونمایی از مستند «بیضرر بودن» معدن طلای تفتان در تهران؛ مردم منطقه از خسارتها و وعدههای محقق نشده میگویند
رصد بلوچستان ـ بر اساس گزارشهای دریافتی، روز گذشته ۸ مهرماه ۱۴٠۱، مدیرعامل شرکت توسعه معادن پارس تأمین، شماری از دهیاران، ریشسفیدان و روحانیون منطقه تفتان را برای شرکت در نشستی در تهران دعوت کرده است.
در این برنامه که با رونمایی از مستندی درباره معدن طلای مادفتی همراه بوده، بر شعارهایی همچون «توسعه و …
🔹نیروهای نظامی عمدا دو جوان بلوچ را در کنارک زیر گرفتند؛ دو جوان مجروح شدند
رصد بلوچستان؛ روز گذشته، ۸ مهرماه ۱۴۰۵، دو جوان بلوچ در جریان تعقیبوگریز نیروهای نظامی در محدوده اسکله صیادی کنارک، پس از برخورد خودروی نیروهای نظامی با موتورسیکلتشان، بهشدت مجروح شدند.
بر اساس گزارش دریافتی، نیروهای نظامی در جریان تعقیب این موتورسیکلت، با خودروی خود از پشت با آن برخورد کردهاند. در پی این برخورد، هر دو سرنشین موتورسیکل…
🔹درگیری مسلحانه در منزلآب زاهدان؛ سپاه از کشته شدن ۶ فرد مسلح خبر داد
رصد بلوچستان؛ از حوالی ساعت ۶ صبح امروز، پنجشنبه ۹ مهرماه ۱۴۰۵، درگیری مسلحانه میان نیروهای نظامی و امنیتی و افراد مسلح در محدوده منزلآب زاهدان آغاز شده و طبق گزارشهای دریافتی، صدای تیراندازی شدید و شلیک گلولههای آرپیجی در منطقه شنیده میشود.
در همین رابطه، قرارگاه قدس نیروی زمینی سپاه مدعی شده است که در جریان این درگیری، ۶ فرد مسلح کشته شد…
🔹 کشته شدن یک مأمور نظامی در حمله افراد مسلح به ایستوبازرسی راسک
رصد بلوچستان ـ بامداد امروز پنجشنبه ۹ مهرماه ۱۴۰۵، در پی حمله افراد مسلح به ایستوبازرسی در شهرستان راسک، یک مأمور نظامی کشته شد.
هویت مأمور کشته شده گروهبان یکم «علیرضا سنچولی» اعلام شده است.
#رصد_بلوچستان
@rasadbalochistan
🔹 دلتنگی مادر خدانور لجهای در فراق فرزندش؛ «کاش یکی شبیهش بود تا یک ساعت بغلش میکردم»
رصد بلوچستان ـ مادر «خدانور لجهای» با گذشت چهار سال از جان باختن فرزندش، در بیان دلتنگی خود میگوید: «کاش یکی شبیهش بود و برای یک ساعت میتوانستم او را بغل کنم.»
خدانور لجهای فرزند عیسی، در تاریخ ۹ مهرماه ۱۴۰۱ در جریان اعتراضات و تیراندازی نیروهای نظامی در زاهدان زخمی شد و روز بعد، ۱۰ مهرماه، در روز سالگرد ولادتش بر اثر شدت جر…
🔹اطلاعات تکمیلی؛ سوء استفاده سپاه و اجبار دانشآموزان دبیرستانی بلوچ به شرکت در رژه «جانفدایان» در جالق
رصد بلوچستان ـ بر اساس اطلاعات رسیده به رصد بلوچستان، شماری از دختران حاضر در رژه حکومتی «جانفدایان» در شهر جالق، دانشآموزان دبیرستانی بلوچ بودهاند که به گفته منابع، از سوی سپاه و مسئولان مدارس برای شرکت در این مراسم و حضور در رژه با سلاح کلاشینکف وادار شدهاند.
به گفته منابع، حضور دانشآموزان دختر در این برن…
🔹بحران گاز در بلوچستان؛ تانکرهای حامل گاز بهجای توزیع در شهرها، راهی مرز ریمدان میشوند
صد بلوچستان _ ویدیویی که به دست ما رسیده، تانکرهای حامل گاز را در مسیر مرز ریمدان نشان میدهد.
بر اساس اطلاعات دریافتی درباره این محمولهها، تانکرهایی که قرار است برای تأمین گاز شهرهای بلوچستان و تحویل به مراکز و شرکتهای توزیع وارد چرخه مصرف شوند، به جای رسیدن به مقصد، بهصورت غیرقانونی به سمت مرز منتقل میشوند.
در همین حال،…
🔹 «شوی سیاسی» سپاه در جالق؛ رژه زنان مسلح با کلاشینکف
رصد بلوچستان ـ سپاه پاسداران در مراسمی حکومتی در شهر جالق، شماری از زنان مسلح به کلاشینکف را سوار بر خودرو در قالب رژه به نمایش گذاشت.
جالق پیشتر شاهد تظاهرات و اعتراضهای جدی علیه جمهوری اسلامی بوده است؛ از جمله در سال ۱۳۹۷، پس از کشته و زخمی شدن چند جوان بلوچ در منطقه مرزی، اعتراضات گسترده شکل گرفته بود و ساختمان بخشداری به آتش کشیده شد.
#رصد_بلوچستان
@rasad…
😡27🔥6❤5💔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 264 posts we hold for @rasadbalochistan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@rasadbalochistan edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@rasadbalochistan named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rasadbalochistanhttp named in 2 posts, 3 September 2026 – 4 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
HAALVSH | حال وش @haalvsh · 67,833 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
جنبش دادخواهان و آزادگان @jda_jonbesh · 29,879 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 7 September 2026
کانال رسمی شیخ الاسلام مولانا عبدالحمید @molanaabdolhamid · 49,006 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
شبكه كلمه Kalemeh TV Iran @kalemehtv · 48,084 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
بلوچستانی ها @balochestaniha1 · 22,855 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 September 2026
نمبر وان بلوچNWB @nambaronebalouch · 35,165 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 2 September 2026
Zahedaniha | زاهدانی ها @zahedanihaa · 51,288 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
گندم خبر (پرس) @gandomkhabar_sb · 26,025 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 September 2026
ندای بلوچ @Nedaeybaloch · 73,743 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 August 2026
کانال آهنگهای بلوچی @Vava_baloch · 48,411 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 September 2026
دارالافتاء مجازی اهل سنت @Canale_pasokh · 24,354 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 September 2026
دفاع مدیا @defa_lr · 21,713 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 September 2026
سید عقیل هاشمی @seyedaqilhashemi · 21,286 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 October 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رصد بلوچستان” (@rasadbalochistan), 23,343 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rasadbalochistan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.