Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rasank News

Channel

Rasank News

@rasanknews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,839subscribers

+266 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001450196712
TypeChannel
Username@rasanknews
Descriptionرسانه ای تحلیلی خبری با همکاری جمعی از فعالان مدنی و حقوق بشری بلوچ Rasank News For contact: @BLWCH12
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rasanknews

Growth

7,5737,8427,707.57 August 2026 — 7,573 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,635 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,785 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,839 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,829 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,840 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,842 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,839 subscribers7,8397 August 202627 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net +266. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,533–7,882 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 15:047,839-3
24 Aug 2026, 06:547,842+2
20 Aug 2026, 11:137,840+11
17 Aug 2026, 21:367,829-10
14 Aug 2026, 20:557,839+54
11 Aug 2026, 13:027,785+150
8 Aug 2026, 20:017,635+62
7 Aug 2026, 23:157,573first reading

Engagement

223 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.70%
avg views ÷ 7,839 subscribers
Avg views / post
290
223 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.718%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
223
of 223 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 83 of 223 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held223 (7 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total64,618
Reactions total188
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
17,100
Videos
14,900
Links
19,500

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
39m 01s
Average length
53s

Measured directly from 44 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

188 reactions across 80 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8344.1%
🤯4523.9%
👎2714.4%
👍179.04%
👏168.51%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 83 of the 223 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 188reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 223 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 19:48 UTC57 viewsread 28 August 2026

افزایش نرخ سوم بنزین به ۱۰ هزار تومان؛ فشار اقتصادی بر مردم در سایه تشدید بحران اقتصادی و محاصره دریایی ایران به گزارش رسانک، امروز جمعه ۶ شهریور ماه ۱۴۰۵، مسعود پزشکیان، رئیس دولت ایران، با اعلام افزایش نرخ سوم بنزین از پنج هزار تومان به ۱۰ هزار تومان، گفت این نرخ بیش از ۱۰ هزار تومان نخواهد شد. بر اساس این تصمیم، نرخ‌های سهمیه‌ای ۱۵۰۰ و ۳۰۰۰ تومانی فعلاً بدون تغییر باقی خواهند ماند. این تصمیم در شرایطی اتخاذ شده

28 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC195 viewsread 28 August 2026
Video

ویدئویی از خودروی پلاک شخصی نیروهای نظامی هدف تیراندازی در محور میرجاوه به زاهدان به گزارش رسانک، امروز جمعه ۶ شهریورماه ۱۴۰۵، ویدئوی دریافتی خودروی تویوتا هایلوکس با پلاک شخصی نیروهای نظامی را نشان می‌دهد که شامگاه گذشته ۵ شهریورماه در محور مواصلاتی میرجاوه به زاهدان هدف تیراندازی افراد مسلح قرار گرفته است. در این ویدئو، آثار اصابت ده‌ها گلوله بر بدنه خودرو دیده می‌شود و بخش قابل توجهی از گلوله‌ها از سمت روبه‌رو ب

28 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC192 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

دُزاپ ءُ میرجاوہ ئے راہ ءَ سلاہ بندیں مردمانی تیرگواری ءَ دو نزامی کُشگ ءُ ٹپّیگ بوتگ رَسانک نیوز/ پنچشمبے 5 شهریور ماہ 1405، دُزاپ ءُ میرجاوہ ئے راہ ءَ سلاہ بندیں مردمانی نزامی ٹولییے سرا تیرگواری ءَ یک نزامییے کُشگ ءُ یکی دگہ ٹپّیگ بوتگ. سیستان ءُ بلوچستان پلیسئے ھال سرکنوک ءَ گوَشتگ: ماں اے اُرش ءَ، استوار دو «اَلی ھیدری»، چہ سیمسراں چاروگیں نزامی ٹولییا تیر وارتگ ءُ ساہ داتگ، یکّے دگہ چہ آییئے ھمراھان ءَ ھم تیر

28 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC280 viewsread 28 August 2026

واژگونی دو خودروی سوختبر طرح رزاق در مسیر صعب‌العبور چتکانی ـ مرز شمسر سراوان به گزارش رسانک، امروز جمعه ۶ شهریورماه ۱۴۰۵، دو دستگاه خودروی سوختبر در محور چتکانی بم‌پشت به سمت مرز شمسر شهرستان سراوان واژگون شده‌اند که به کسی آسیب نرسیده ولی خسارات مالی برای سوختبران در پی داشته است. این خودروها متعلق به سوختبرانی هستند که فعالیت آنان به‌صورت رسمی و تحت نظارت طرح موسوم به «رزاق» انجام می‌شود؛ با این حال، آنان برای تر

28 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC315 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

عبور بی‌نوبت خودروهای سنگین از مرز ریمدان با پرداخت ۳۵ میلیون تومان؛ تداوم معطلی چند هفته‌ای رانندگان به گزارش رسانک، شامگاه گذشته ۵ شهریور ماه ۱۴۰۵، ویدئوی دریافتی نشان می‌دهد برخی خودروهای سنگین حاضر در مرز ریمدان، در ساعات غیراداری و خارج از روند معمول، از قسمت زنجیری که اخیرا بسته شده، عبور داده می‌شوند. به گفته منابع رسانک، صاحبان برخی از این خودروها یا بارها برای عبور بدون نوبت، مبلغ ۳۵ میلیون تومان پرداخت کرد

1🤯1

27 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC420 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026

تکرار ادعای حکومتی درباره نبود تبعیض از سوی امام جمعه فنوج؛ «۴۳۰ نماز جمعه» چگونه معیار رفع تبعیض شد؟ به گزارش رسانک، روز پنجشنبه ۵ شهریورماه ۱۴۰۵، ویدئویی از سخنان مولوی «سیدعلی قریشی»، امام جمعه شهرستان فنوج، منتشر شده که در آن با استناد به برگزاری ۴۳۰ نماز جمعه اهل‌سنت در استان سیستان و بلوچستان، وجود تبعیض علیه اهل‌سنت را رد کرده و گفته است: «وقتی ۴۳۰ نماز جمعه هست، نباید دائم از تبعیض گفت؛ چون ممکن است یک نفر ا

👍2🤯21

27 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC403 viewsread 28 August 2026

ایست‌های بازرسی در شیرآباد و خیابان خرمشهر زاهدان؛ «نمایش امنیت» در سایه تداوم ناامنی به گزارش رسانک، شامگاه امروز پنجشنبه ۵ شهریورماه ۱۴۰۵، ویدئوی دریافتی از زاهدان نشان می‌دهد نیروهای نظامی در منطقه شیرآباد این شهر اقدام به برپایی ایست بازرسی کرده‌اند. همچنین گزارش‌های دریافتی از خیابان خرمشهر نیز از استقرار ایست‌های بازرسی و وضعیت مشابه در این محدوده حکایت دارد. شهروندان این ایست‌های بازرسی را بیشتر موجب ایجاد م

Showing the 12 most recent of 223 posts we hold for @rasanknews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@rasanknews edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,433,906 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

HAALVSH | حال وش
@haalvsh · 66,077
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
شبكه كلمه Kalemeh TV Iran
@kalemehtv · 48,574
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
Zahedaniha | زاهدانی‌ ها
@zahedanihaa · 50,472
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
کانال رسمی شیخ الاسلام مولانا عبدالحمید
@molanaabdolhamid · 49,034
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rasank News” (@rasanknews), 7,839 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rasanknews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.