Channel
@IranHumanRightsOrg
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,260subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001345095639 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IranHumanRightsOrg |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IranHumanRightsOrg |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
8,670 average views per post against 1,260 subscribers — an engagement rate of 688.1%. Across the 15,813 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 8.34% and 32.3%, with a median of 17.2%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 20 of 20 published in the window (1 exact, 19 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 173,401 |
| Mature posts only | 721.6% over 19 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 1,260 measured 9 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b1000:fas · 15,813 channels · p10 3.91% · p25 8.34% · p50 17.2% · p75 32.3% · p90 53.6% |
| Position in cohort | 99.855th percentile · 39.9× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.233% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Persian · 84.2%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:11 | 1,260 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:20 | 1,256 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 1,257 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:27 | 1,257 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 173,401 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
حکم #اعدام آروین خیرخواه، جوانی که با اتهام امنیتی «محاربه» به اعدام محکوم شده بود، در زندان #شاهرود اجرا شد. #نه_به_اعدام ادامه مطلب فرم ارسال روایتهای اعتراضات ۱۴۰۴ توییتر اینستاگرام مجله حقوق ما فیسبوک تلگرام 📡 @IranHumanRightsOrg
Il curdo Mehdi Roshani rischia la pena di morte dopo aver confessato sotto tortura Mehdi Roshani, un manifestante curdo arrestato in relazione alle proteste di Malekshahi del 6 gennaio, è stato condannato a morte. Il manifestante, detenuto in isolamento per due mesi, è stato sottoposto a gravi torture per estorcergli confessioni autoincriminanti, utilizzate poi come prove per la sua condanna. Secondo informazioni ott…
حکم #اعدام دستکم شش زندانی که با اتهامات مربوط به «مواد مخدر» به اعدام محکوم شده بودند، در زندان #تایباد به اجرا درآمد. هویت پنج تن از این افراد که شامل سه تبعه کشور #افغانستان و یک شهروند #بلوچ میشود، ملا ربیع عبدالمحمدی، سخی عبدالمحمدی، قائد نصیری، نادر آبیل و مظفر میناپور احراز شده است. سه زندانی تبعه افغانستان در حالی اعدام شدند که از حق انجام آخرین ملاقات با خانواده خود محروم بودند. #نه_به_اعدام ادامه مطلب فرم…
حکم #اعدام دستکم دو زندانی بلوچ بهنامهای محمدعلی نارویی و محمدبخش شهبخش که در پروندههای جداگانه با اتهامات مربوط به «مواد مخدر» به اعدام محکوم شده بودند، در زندان #دامغان به اجرا درآمد. #نه_به_اعدام ادامه مطلب فرم ارسال روایتهای اعتراضات ۱۴۰۴ توییتر اینستاگرام مجله حقوق ما فیسبوک تلگرام 📡 @IranHumanRightsOrg
Omid Behzad e Pourya Safvat giustiziati per presunto spionaggio a favore di Israele I media governativi hanno annunciato che Omid Behzad e Pourya Safvat, accusati di aver inviato coordinate militari a Israele durante la guerra dei dodici giorni e quella dei quaranta giorni, sono stati giustiziati in un luogo non specificato. Dal 28 febbraio, almeno dodici persone sono state giustiziate con l'accusa di spionaggio, ins…
خبرگزاری میزان، وابسته به قوه قضاییه، گزارش داد که امید بهزاد و پوریا صفوت روز ۱۲ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ در مکانی نامعلوم اعدام شدند. این دو نفر با اتهام «جاسوسی و همکاری اطلاعاتی با رژیم صهیونیستی» به اعدام محکوم شده بودند. #نه_به_اعدام ادامه مطلب فرم ارسال روایتهای اعتراضات ۱۴۰۴ توییتر اینستاگرام مجله حقوق ما فیسبوک تلگرام 📡 @IranHumanRightsOrg
حکم #اعدام دستکم دو زندانی، یک زن و یک مرد بهنامهای مهتاب شیرمحمدی و سیروس صیادی که در پروندههای جداگانه با اتهام «قتل عمد» به قصاص نفس محکوم شده بودند، در زندان مرکزی #یاسوج به اجرا درآمد. #نه_به_اعدام ادامه مطلب فرم ارسال روایتهای اعتراضات ۱۴۰۴ توییتر اینستاگرام مجله حقوق ما فیسبوک تلگرام 📡 @IranHumanRightsOrg
حکم #اعدام دستکم دو زندانی بهنامهای محمد داودی و اسماعیل آقایی که در پروندههای جداگانه با اتهامات مربوط به «مواد مخدر» به اعدام محکوم شده بودند، در زندان مرکزی #سمنان به اجرا درآمد. همچنین، در پروندهای دیگر در همین زندان، برای یک خواهر و برادر جوان بهنامهای افشین شهریاری و سهیلا شهریاری که «به دلیل فقر و استیصال مالی اقدام به جابهجایی مواد مخدر کرده بودند»، حکم اعدام صادر شده است. #نه_به_اعدام ادامه مطلب فرم …
مهدی روشنی، #معترض کُرد بازداشتشده در ارتباط با اعتراضات ۱۶ دیماه در #ملکشاهی، با اتهامهای امنیتی به اعدام محکوم شده است. او طی دو ماه در بیخبری مطلق نگهداری شده و برای گرفتن اعترافات علیه خود تحت شکنجههای شدید قرار گرفته است. همین اعترافات اجباری مبنای صدور حکم اعدام بود. #نه_به_اعدام ادامه مطلب فرم ارسال روایتهای اعتراضات ۱۴۰۴ توییتر اینستاگرام مجله حقوق ما فیسبوک تلگرام 📡 @IranHumanRightsOrg
حکم #اعدام یک زندانی بهنام علی رسولی که با اتهام «قتل عمد» به قصاص نفس محکوم شده بود، در زندان مرکزی #همدان به اجرا درآمد. #نه_به_اعدام ادامه مطلب فرم ارسال روایتهای اعتراضات ۱۴۰۴ توییتر اینستاگرام مجله حقوق ما فیسبوک تلگرام 📡 @IranHumanRightsOrg
La Corte Suprema conferma la condanna a morte per il manifestante Benyamin Naghdi Secondo il quotidiano Emtedad, la Sezione 41 della Corte Suprema della Repubblica Islamica ha confermato la condanna a morte inflitta a Benyamin Naghdi. Era stato condannato a morte dalla Prima Sezione del Tribunale della Rivoluzione di Shiraz a maggio. Il ventiseienne lottatore di MMA e kickboxing era stato arrestato durante una protes…
حکم #اعدام دستکم دو زندانی بهنامهای سینا بهرامی و فرزاد سبحانی که در پروندههای جداگانه با اتهام «قتل عمد» به قصاص نفس محکوم شده بودند، در زندان مرکزی #ارومیه (دریا) به اجرا درآمد. #نه_به_اعدام ادامه مطلب فرم ارسال روایتهای اعتراضات ۱۴۰۴ توییتر اینستاگرام مجله حقوق ما فیسبوک تلگرام 📡 @IranHumanRightsOrg
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @IranHumanRightsOrg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 540,198 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سازمان حقوق بشر ایران” (@IranHumanRightsOrg), 1,260 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IranHumanRightsOrg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.