National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 7 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 30 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 7, the earliest publisher we hold is @javanmardi77. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 6 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,169–3,192 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 09:38
3,172
-7
10 Aug 2026, 20:45
3,179
-9
7 Aug 2026, 23:22
3,188
-1
7 Aug 2026, 00:30
3,189
no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:19
3,189
first reading
Engagement
34 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.85%
avg views ÷ 3,172 subscribers
Avg views / post
58.8
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 34 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 34 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
34 (6 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
1,999
Reactions total
8
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 23:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 51s
Average length
27s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4
50.0%
🤬
4
50.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔺🔻بسنت: تنگه هرمز تا دو سال آینده «بیاهمیت» خواهد شد
اسکات بسنت، وزیر خزانهداری آمریکا، اعلام کرد تنگه هرمز دیگر هرگز به جایگاه و شرایط گذشته بازنخواهد گشت و پیشبینی کرد ظرف دو سال آینده اهمیت راهبردی این آبراه بهشدت کاهش یابد. اظهارات امروز بسنت درباره آینده تنگه هرمز در گزارشهای منتشرشده نیز بازتاب یافته است.
بسنت گفت ایرانیها از تنگه هرمز بهعنوان یک «نقطه گلوگاهی» استفاده کرده یا تلاش کردهاند از موقعیت آن…
🔺🔻نیویورکتایمز: ذخایر اورانیوم جمهوری اسلامی همچنان برای ساخت ۹ تا ۱۰ بمب هستهای کافی است؛ حملات نظامی برنامه اتمی تهران را متوقف نکرد
روزنامه نیویورکتایمز گزارش داد که با وجود حملات آمریکا و اسرائیل به تأسیسات هستهای جمهوری اسلامی، برنامه هستهای تهران متوقف نشده و این حملات تنها روند آن را کند کرده است.
بر اساس ارزیابی بازرسان آژانس بینالمللی انرژی اتمی، جمهوری اسلامی همچنان ذخایر قابلتوجهی از اورانیوم با غ…
🔻🔺انفجار در پالایشگاه نفت «اسلوونفت» در پایتخت اسلواکی؛ آتشسوزی در تأسیسات
گزارشها حاکی است انفجاری در پالایشگاه نفت «اسلوونفت» در براتیسلاوا، پایتخت اسلواکی، رخ داده و در پی آن آتشسوزی در این مجموعه صنعتی به وقوع پیوسته است.
هنوز جزئیات بیشتری درباره علت انفجار، میزان خسارات و تلفات احتمالی منتشر نشده است.
🆔@javanmardi77
🔻🔺گزارشهای تأییدنشده از کشته شدن فرمانده یگان پهپادی عربستان در حملات حوثیها
برخی منابع غیررسمی عربی از احتمال کشته شدن سرلشکر عبدالله العنزی، فرمانده یگان پهپادی عربستان سعودی، در جریان حملات حوثیها در یمن خبر میدهند.
بر اساس این گزارشها، عبدالله العنزی به همراه شماری از افسران و سربازان سعودی پس از این حملات مفقود شده و برخی منابع مدعی کشته شدن او شدهاند.
با این حال، تاکنون مقامهای عربستان سعودی یا منابع …
🔺بلومبرگ: درآمد خارجی کره شمالی چهار برابر شد؛ کیم جونگ اون پولدارتر از هر زمان دیگری
بلومبرگ گزارش داد کیم جونگ اون، رهبر کره شمالی، با وجود تحریمهای گسترده بینالمللی، اکنون بیش از هر مقطع دیگری در ۱۵ سال حکومت خود به منابع مالی دسترسی دارد.
بر اساس این گزارش، کره شمالی بین سالهای ۲۰۲۲ تا ۲۰۲۵ تا ۲۲ میلیارد دلار درآمد خارجی کسب کرده است؛ رقمی که تقریباً چهار برابر برآورد مربوط به دوره چهارساله پیش از آن است.
ب…
🔻🔺بِسنت: جمهوری اسلامی را از گلو گرفتهایم؛ احتمال توافق و آتشبس حتی امروز یا فردا
اسکات بِسنت، وزیر خزانهداری آمریکا، با اشاره به فشارهای اقتصادی شدید بر جمهوری اسلامی گفت واشینگتن حکومت ایران را «از گلو گرفته است» و وضعیت اقتصادی آن بهشدت تحت فشار قرار دارد.
بِسنت گفت: «ما آنها را از گلو گرفتهایم. تورم مواد غذاییشان به ۱۵۰ تا ۱۸۰ درصد رسیده و حتی قادر به پرداخت حقوق نیروهایشان نیستند.»
وزیر خزانهداری آمریک…
🔺🔺هگست: «ترامپ جنگ ایران را برد»؛ تاریخ او را نیرویی تعیینکننده در تغییر خاورمیانه خواهد شناخت
پیت هگست، وزیر جنگ آمریکا، دقایقی پیش در حساب رسمی خود در شبکه اجتماعی ایکس، متنی با عنوان «ترامپ جنگ ایران را برد» منتشر کرد و از عملکرد رئیسجمهوری آمریکا در جنگ با جمهوری اسلامی دفاع کرد.
هگست نوشت: «واقعیت این است؛ همان حقیقت ناخوشایندی که تردیدکنندگان نمیخواهند درباره آن صحبت کنند. اگر ترامپ در این جنگ در حال شکست …
🔺🔻حکم اعدام برای دو جوان شیرازی؛ «کمک به معترضان زخمی» به اتهام محاربه ختم شد
شعبه اول دادگاه انقلاب شیراز، مجتبی دهبندی، ۲۳ ساله، و کیانوش حمزهای کازرونی، ۲۷ ساله، را با اتهام «محاربه» به اعدام محکوم کرده است.
بر اساس گزارشهای منتشرشده، پرونده این دو جوان پس از آن شکل گرفت که در جریان اعتراضات سراسری، چند معترض زخمی را برای مداوا و کمکرسانی به محل کسب خود منتقل کردند.
یک منبع آگاه گفته است نیروهای امنیتی با بر…
🔻🔺امارات حمله حوثیها به نجران را محکوم کرد
وزارت امور خارجه امارات متحده عربی با انتشار بیانیهای، حمله حوثیهای مورد حمایت جمهوری اسلامی به منطقه نجران در عربستان سعودی را بهشدت محکوم کرد.
در این بیانیه، این حمله «نقض آشکار حاکمیت عربستان سعودی» و تهدیدی علیه امنیت و ثبات منطقه توصیف شده است.
امارات همچنین بر حمایت کامل خود از عربستان سعودی تأکید کرد و اعلام داشت که در حفظ امنیت، ثبات و حاکمیت این کشور در کنار …
🔺🔻مراسم هفتم آروین خیرخواهان؛ فریادهای مادر بر مزار فرزند اعدامشده
تصاویر منتشرشده از مراسم هفتم آروین خیرخواهان، جوانی که با حکم اعدام جمهوری اسلامی جان خود را از دست داد، صحنههایی از سوگواری خانواده و ضجههای مادر او بر مزار فرزندش را نشان میدهد.
آروین خیرخواهان پیشتر از سوی شعبه یک دادگاه انقلاب شاهرود با اتهام «محاربه» به اعدام محکوم شده بود و حکم او بامداد ۱۰ مرداد به اجرا درآمد.
🆔 @javanmardi77
🔻🔺عربستان، ترکیه و پاکستان «توافق دفاع مشترک مکه» را امضا کردند
عربستان سعودی، ترکیه و پاکستان روز جمعه از امضای «توافق دفاع مشترک مکه» خبر دادند؛ توافقی که بر اساس آن، هرگونه حمله مسلحانه به یکی از سه کشور، حمله به هر سه کشور تلقی خواهد شد.
این توافق در نشست سران سه کشور در مکه و با حضور محمد بن سلمان، رجب طیب اردوغان و شهباز شریف امضا شد. بر اساس بیانیه مشترک، هدف از این توافق تقویت بازدارندگی جمعی، توسعه همکاری…
🔺🔻 رئیسجمهور ترامپ درباره ایران:
آنها میخواهند توافقی انجام دهند. ببینید، واضح است که نمیخواهند مورد حمله قرار بگیرند.
آنها میخواهند توافقی انجام دهند. بنابراین، خواهیم دید.
🆔@javanmardi77
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @NOTOISLAMICREPUBLIC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 770,312 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@NOTOISLAMICREPUBLIC named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@javanardi77 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
AVATODAY @javanmardi77 · 211,286 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال “ ملی انقلاب مردم ایران ”” (@NOTOISLAMICREPUBLIC), 3,172 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NOTOISLAMICREPUBLIC.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
