درگیری و تیراندازی در خیابان باقری زابل بر اثر اختلاف دو کودک در مدرسه شبکه اسناد حقوق بشر بلوچستان _ شامگاه یکشنبه ۱۷ آبان ماه ۱۴۰۵، اختلاف و دعوای دو کودک در مدرسه باعث تنش و درگیری خانواده ها و اقدام به تیراندازی متقابل در خیابان باقری زابل شد. به گفته منابع شبکه اسناد، دو دانشآموز در مدرسه دچار اختلاف و دعوا میشوند که این امر باعث تنش بین خانوادهها و اقدام به تیراندازی متقابل در خیابان باقری زابل شده است. ت…

Channel
شبکه اسناد حقوق بشر بلوچستان
@balochistanhrdn
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,873subscribers
-121 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001009901020 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @balochistanhrdn |
| Description | شبکه اسناد حقوق بشر بلوچستان نهاد مستقل تخصصی در ثبت و مستندسازی نظاممند نقض حقوق بشر در بلوچستان، در خدمت حق حقیقت و دادخواهی. برای ارسال اخبار و گزارش ها @Balo_ch1 وبسایت: www.balochistanhrdn.org |
| Created | 4 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 54 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/balochistanhrdn |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 18:40 | 12,873 | -2 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 13:15 | 12,875 | -3 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 15:11 | 12,878 | +3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 15:49 | 12,875 | -5 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:09 | 12,880 | -3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:50 | 12,883 | +3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 17:09 | 12,880 | +4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 16:30 | 12,876 | -6 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 17:11 | 12,882 | -1 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 16:56 | 12,883 | +5 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:05 | 12,878 | -3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 19:17 | 12,881 | -4 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:46 | 12,885 | -4 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:44 | 12,889 | -1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 11:46 | 12,890 | +13 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 11:16 | 12,877 | -11 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 03:47 | 12,888 | -3 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 02:27 | 12,891 | -2 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 23:38 | 12,893 | -5 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 00:59 | 12,898 | first reading |
Engagement
397 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.55%
- avg views ÷ 12,873 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 714
- 100 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.693%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 100
- of 397 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 93 of 100 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 397 (8 August 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 71,441 |
| Reactions total | 473 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 07:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈12,600
- Videos
- ≈6,870
- Links
- ≈16,700
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 32m
- Average length
- 56s
Measured directly from 99 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,744 reactions across 367 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😡 | 806 | 46.2% | |
| ❤ | 437 | 25.1% | |
| 💔 | 208 | 11.9% | |
| 👍 | 95 | 5.45% | |
| 🔥 | 76 | 4.36% | |
| 😭 | 45 | 2.58% | |
| 🤝 | 34 | 1.95% | |
| 👌 | 25 | 1.43% | |
| 🕊 | 10 | 0.573% | |
| 😨 | 3 | 0.172% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 0.172% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.115% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 368 of the 397 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,744 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 397 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 24 of 100 posts held from the last 30 days (24.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
اعتراض رانندگان تانکرهای سوخت در پالایشگاه نفت ستاره بندرعباس در پی ۱۱ روز بلاتکلیفی و نبود امکانات رفاهی رانندگان کامیونهای تانکر حامل سوخت در پالایشگاه نفت ستاره بندرعباس در اعتراض به توقف بارگیری و صادر نشدن پلمب محمولهها برای مقاصد مرزی ریمدان و پیشین معترض هستند. این رانندگان میگویند با وجود داشتن حواله بارگیری، ۱۱ روز است در بلاتکلیفی به سر میبرند و علاوه بر ازدحام و شلوغی محوطه پالایشگاه، با نبود امکانات …
Video, posted without a caption
❤1
درخواست کمک برای جلب رضایت سه شاکی خصوصی و آزادی «ابوبکر اسماعیلزهی» پس از هشت سال حبس در زندان زاهدان ابوبکر اسماعیلزهی، زندانی محبوس در زندان زاهدان، با گذشت حدود هشت سال از زمان بازداشت، همچنان در انتظار جلب رضایت سه شاکی خصوصی و فراهم شدن زمینه آزادی خود است. خانواده او که برای جلب رضایت خانواده مقتول مبلغ ۱۰ میلیارد تومان پرداخت کرده و تمام دارایی خود را فروختهاند، اکنون توان مالی برای جلب رضایت شاکیان باقی…
💔1
Photo, posted without a caption
جان باختن یک سوخت بر پس از ۸ روز تحمل جراحت ناشی از سوختگی در فهرج یک سوخت بر بلوچ که در پی آتش سوزی خودرو در محل دپوی سوخت در فهرج دچار سوختگی شدید و مجروح شده بود، پس از گذشت ۸ روز جان باخت. به گزارش شبکه اسناد حقوق بشر بلوچستان، امروز یکشنبه ۱۷ آبان ماه ۱۴۰۵، یک سوخت بر بلوچ در شهرستان فهرج جان باخت. هویت این سوخت بر، «محمدامین ریگی» ۱۹ ساله اهل فهرج برای شبکه اسناد احراز شده است. گزارش در سایت: https://baloc…
💔3❤2😡1
بازداشت یک شهروند بلوچ در چابهار و انتقال او به زندان مرکزی زاهدان یک شهروند بلوچ با یورش نیروهای امنیتی به یک منزل مسکونی در چابهار بازداشت و پس از حدود ۲۳ روز به زندان مرکزی زاهدان منتقل شده است. به گزارش شبکه اسناد حقوق بشر بلوچستان، امروز یکشنبه ۱۷ آبان ماه ۱۴۰۵، یک شهروند بلوچ پس از بازداشت در چابهار به زندان مرکزی زاهدان منتقل شد. هویت این شهروند بلوچ، «سعید بلوچ» ۲۲ ساله فرزند مرادبخش، اهل عثمانآباد چابها…
😡4💔1🤝1
ادامه بلاتکلیفی سه شهروند بلوچ بازداشتشده در یورش امنیتی به روستای چاهاحمد سه شهروند بلوچ از جمله دو برادر، با گذشت بیش از سه ماه از زمان بازداشت در جریان یورش نیروهای امنیتی به روستای چاهاحمد شهرستان تفتان، همچنان در بند ۹ امنیتی زندان مرکزی زاهدان در وضعیت بلاتکلیف به سر میبرند. به گزارش شبکه اسناد حقوق بشر بلوچستان، امروز یکشنبه ۱۷ آبان ماه ۱۴۰۵، سه شهروند بلوچ بازداشتشده در یورش امنیتی به روستای چاهاحمد ش…
😡3❤1💔1🔥1
کشته شدن یک زن بلوچ ۴۵ ساله با یورش افراد مسلح به یک منزل مسکونی در سیفآباد لاشار یک زن بلوچ ۴۵ ساله در پی یورش افراد مسلح در روستای سیفآباد شهرستان لاشار هدف تیراندازی قرار گرفت و کشته شد. به گزارش شبکه اسناد حقوق بشر بلوچستان، امروز یکشنبه ۱۷ آبان ماه ۱۴۰۵، یک زن بلوچ در شهرستان لاشار کشته شد. هویت این زن بلوچ، «خانبیبی طوقی»، حدودا ۴۵ ساله اهل روستای سیفآباد شهرستان لاشار برای شبکه اسناد احراز شده است. گز…
😡2💔1
مجروح شدن یک سوختبر بلوچ بر اثر تیراندازی نیروهای لباسشخصی سپاه در زاهدان یک سوختبر بلوچ بر اثر تیراندازی نیروهای لباسشخصی سپاه در ورودی شهر زاهدان، در مسیر میرجاوه، بهشدت مجروح شد و به بیمارستان انتقال یافت. شدت جراحات وارده به دست این شهروند بهگونهای است که احتمال قطع عضو وجود دارد. به گزارش شبکه اسناد حقوق بشر بلوچستان، روز جمعه ۱۵ آبانماه ۱۴۰۵، نیروهای لباسشخصی سپاه بدون هشدار قبلی به سمت خودروی یک سوخ…
💔2😡2🤝1
کشته شدن یک شهروند بلوچ در پی تیراندازی افراد مسلح در کلات شهرستان سرباز یک شهروند بلوچ در شهر کلات، مرکز شهرستان سرباز، هدف تیراندازی افراد مسلح ناشناس قرار گرفت و بر اثر اصابت گلوله جان خود را از دست داد. به گزارش شبکه اسناد حقوق بشر بلوچستان، امروز یکشنبه ۱۷ آبانماه ۱۴۰۵، یک شهروند بلوچ در شهر کلات شهرستان سرباز کشته شد. هویت این شهروند بلوچ، «مهراب آسکانی»، ۵۲ ساله فرزند لشکرخان، اهل روستای سرایدان شهرستان ای…
😡3🔥1
شنیده شدن صدای چندین انفجار در شهرستان جاسک شبکه اسناد حقوق بشر بلوچستان _ شامگاه شنبه ۱۶ آبان ماه ۱۴۰۵، لحظاتی پیش صدای چندین انفجار مهیب در برخی از مناطق شهرستان جاسک شنیده شده است. گزارش ها حاکی است که صدای دو انفجار در جزیره قشم نیز شنیده شده است. تاکنون از ماهیت این انفجارها اطلاعی در دست نیست. وبسایت: www.balochistanhrdn.org تلگرام: @balochistanhrdn تماس با ما: @balo_ch1
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 397 posts we hold for @balochistanhrdn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@balochistanhrdn named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 9 November 2026 – 9 November 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@haalvsh · 71,505
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
@rasadbalochistan · 23,907
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
@jda_jonbesh · 30,070
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 7 September 2026
@balochestaniha1 · 22,943
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 September 2026
@hranews · 29,190
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 5 September 2026
@zahedanihaa · 52,097
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
@Hengaw_Org · 25,653
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 September 2026
@molanaabdolhamid · 48,846
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
@kalemehtv · 47,355
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
@ToomajSalehi · 31,142
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
@Vava_baloch · 50,564
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 September 2026
@masih_alinejad · 54,580
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026
@Farsi_Iranwire · 47,372
Telegram ranks this channel #98 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شبکه اسناد حقوق بشر بلوچستان” (@balochistanhrdn), 12,873 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/balochistanhrdn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.