Pradyumn Tripathi Sir Testbook pinned a photo

Channel
Pradyumn Tripathi Sir Testbook
@pradyumansir_testbook
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
30,693subscribers
+325 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001791944033 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pradyumansir_testbook |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pradyumansir_testbook |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 30,693 | +254 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 30,439 | +50 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 30,389 | +4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 30,385 | +5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 30,380 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 30,386 | +13 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 30,373 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 30,380 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 30,381 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 30,375 | +7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 30,368 | first reading |
Engagement
255 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.48%
- avg views ÷ 30,693 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,380
- 210 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.203%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 255
- of 255 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 106 of 210 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 255 (6 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 289,069 |
| Reactions total | 365 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
365 reactions across 93 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 222 | 60.8% | |
| 👍 | 83 | 22.7% | |
| 🔥 | 38 | 10.4% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 2.47% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 0.822% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 0.822% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.548% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.548% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 0.548% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.274% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 106 of the 255 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 365reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 255 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🇮🇳Independence NET JRF Series🇮🇳 | UGC NET Political Science Dec 2026 📌Time 7pm (Mon - Wed- Friday) Join Free Masterclass on Testbook App at 7:00 PM- https://link.testbook.com/bwKpIMHUFUb
Pradyumn Tripathi Sir Testbook pinned «Chalo NTA ✊ Revise Answer Key 📌18th Aug - 12 pm https://youtube.com/shorts/mrYEPNqoCCU?si=lsI20wLv0LDLYtm6»
Chalo NTA ✊ Revise Answer Key 📌18th Aug - 12 pm https://youtube.com/shorts/mrYEPNqoCCU?si=lsI20wLv0LDLYtm6
Join Now - https://youtube.com/live/uKXjDAHOj84?feature=share
❤5
🔴 Response Sheet and Answer Key Fraud If you feel that the chosen option in response sheet is different from what you selected in exam then fill this form, we will combine all these complains and take action against NTA. अगर आपको लगता है कि रिस्पॉन्स शीट में चुना गया विकल्प परीक्षा में आपके चुने गए विकल्प से अलग है, तो यह फ़ॉर्म भरें; हम इन सभी शिकायतों को इकट्ठा करेंगे और NTA के ख़िलाफ़ कार्रवाई करेंगे। https://for…
Pradyumn Tripathi Sir Testbook pinned «🔴 Get Ready to Join at 2 pm Live https://www.youtube.com/live/uKXjDAHOj84?si=bxCG-cH-ZtRC5va-»
🔴 Get Ready to Join at 2 pm Live https://www.youtube.com/live/uKXjDAHOj84?si=bxCG-cH-ZtRC5va-
❤1
Pradyumn Tripathi Sir Testbook pinned «📣 Good News Rajat Sir and Pradyumn Sir Aaarahe hai be ready. https://youtube.com/shorts/tWeS4SfvkfM?si=Yhctzhni2pLdHj3S»
📣 Good News Rajat Sir and Pradyumn Sir Aaarahe hai be ready. https://youtube.com/shorts/tWeS4SfvkfM?si=Yhctzhni2pLdHj3S
❤3
Pradyumn Tripathi Sir Testbook pinned «🔴 Response Sheet and Answer Key Fraud If you feel that the chosen option in response sheet is different from what you selected in exam then fill this form, we will combine all these complains and take action against NTA. अगर आपको लगता है कि रिस्पॉन्स शीट…»
🔴 Response Sheet and Answer Key Fraud If you feel that the chosen option in response sheet is different from what you selected in exam then fill this form, we will combine all these complains and take action against NTA. अगर आपको लगता है कि रिस्पॉन्स शीट में चुना गया विकल्प परीक्षा में आपके चुने गए विकल्प से अलग है, तो यह फ़ॉर्म भरें; हम इन सभी शिकायतों को इकट्ठा करेंगे और NTA के ख़िलाफ़ कार्रवाई करेंगे। https://for…
❤25👏3👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 255 posts we hold for @pradyumansir_testbook. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 118 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Name the campaign launched in January 2018 by the Union Minister for the environment, forest and climate change, which lauds small positive actions performed by individuals or organisations to strengthen the cause of environmental protection.
- 1)Green Good Deeds18%
- 2)Green Skill Development Programme57%
- 3)Clean Air Campaign14%
- 4)Champions of the Earth11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Consider the argument provided below: "Sound is permanent because it is a product like the jar" Identify the fallacy involved in the above argument on the basis of Indian logic from the options given below:
- 1)Fallacy of contradictory reason36%
- 2)Fallacy of wrong assertion17%
- 3)Fallacy of irrelevant reason43%
- 4)Fallacy of trivial reason4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the following is NOT a form of non-verbal communication?
- 1)Eye contact5%
- 2)Posture and body movement13%
- 3)Written memos75%
- 4)Facial expressions7%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What is a good alternative to ipsative assessment?
- 1)Norm-referenced assessment9%
- 2)Criterion-referenced assessment25%
- 3)Portfolio assessment15%
- 4)All of the above51%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Good Moorrnnninngggg Aspirants ☀️ Paper 1 ka Daily Dose 💊💪 Paper 1 | 5 Questions | Are you ready?
- Aaj toh topper mode on 😎57%
- Full josh mein ready 🔥19%
- Thoda revise karke aata hoon 📚17%
- Abhi chai peeke aata hoon ☕7%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Micro teaching is
- 1)Evaluation teaching21%
- 2)Real teaching15%
- 3)Scaled down teaching43%
- 4)Effective teaching21%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 255 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 10,957 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@testbook_ugcnet · 50,6078 postsUGC NET Paper 1 | Testbook SuperCoaching
@tulikamam · 15,0277 postsAnshika Ma’am Testbook
@Anshikamaamtestbook · 17,5444 postsRajat Sir Testbook
@testbookrajatsir · 12,6354 postsAshwani Sir Testbook
@AshwaniSir_Testbook · 15,9592 postsUGC NET Commerce Prep
@bushramaamtestbook · 1,1371 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@KumarBharatEdu · 153,907
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pradyumn Tripathi Sir Testbook” (@pradyumansir_testbook), 30,693 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pradyumansir_testbook.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.