Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for JRF FACTORY🏆

Channel

JRF FACTORY🏆

@jrffactory

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,500subscribers

+137 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002145994191
TypeChannel
Username@jrffactory
CreatedBetween 1 December 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded25 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/jrffactory

Growth

9,3639,5009,431.525 August 2026 — 9,363 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,363 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,372 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,401 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,423 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,500 subscribers25 August 20263 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 9 days, net +137. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,342–9,521 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 02:169,500+77
31 Aug 2026, 02:239,423+22
28 Aug 2026, 11:349,401+29
25 Aug 2026, 10:559,372+9
25 Aug 2026, 03:459,363no change
25 Aug 2026, 03:309,363first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 17 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.7%
avg views ÷ 9,500 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,490
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 44 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held45 (17 August 202629 August 2026)
Views total65,774
Reactions total49
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

49 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3367.3%
👍510.2%
😱48.16%
🥰48.16%
👏24.08%
🙏12.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 05:37 UTCviews —

JRF FACTORY🏆 pinned «JRF, NET & Ph.D. qualify करने वाले सभी students को बहुत-बहुत Congratulations! 🥳🏆 अगर आपने NET/JRF/PhD qualify किया है, तो please अपना Photo + Scorecard share करें, ताकि हम आपका Achievement Poster बना सकें. 💐 👉 Google Form Fill करें: Fill the Google Form You…»

29 Aug 2026, 04:53 UTC483 viewsread 29 August 2026

JRF, NET & Ph.D. qualify करने वाले सभी students को बहुत-बहुत Congratulations! 🥳🏆 अगर आपने NET/JRF/PhD qualify किया है, तो please अपना Photo + Scorecard share करें, ताकि हम आपका Achievement Poster बना सकें. 💐 👉 Google Form Fill करें: Fill the Google Form You can share your scorecard on WhatsApp- 6377486100, 92160 57601 Keep Shining & Keep Inspiring! ✨ — Team Vision JRF

28 Aug 2026, 20:22 UTC934 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Also aap hume hmare helping team numbers and telegram pr bhi score card and photo share kr skte h 😊😊

1

28 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC937 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026

JRF, NET & Ph.D. qualify करने वाले सभी students को बहुत-बहुत Congratulations! 🥳🏆 अगर आपने qualify किया है, तो please अपना Photo + Scorecard share करें, ताकि हम आपका Achievement Poster बना सकें. 💐 👉 Google Form Fill करें: Fill the Google Form Keep Shining & Keep Inspiring! ✨ — Team Vision JRF

3

28 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC923 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/eNPav3VGxHY?si=6TIsNDdWnw8W7Rb2

1

28 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC929 views5 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Finally! UGC NET JUNE 2026 RESULT OUT 🎉🥳

😱41

28 Aug 2026, 14:44 UTC≈1,130 views5 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

UGC NET OFFICIAL ANSWER KEY IS OUT ! Please check on NTA OFFICIAL WEBSITE 🥳

👍5

28 Aug 2026, 14:23 UTC≈1,240 viewsread 29 August 2026

UGC NET OFFICIAL ANSWER KEY IS OUT ! Please check on NTA OFFICIAL WEBSITE 🥳

28 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC≈1,170 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/ea_tLwqIxCk?si=aKCG5XFtonAcE9Kt

🥰4

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @jrffactory. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTCAnonymous Poll499 voters

📢 UGC NET History June 2026 – Marks Wise Poll

  1. Above 21014%
  2. 200 - 21013%
  3. 190 - 20015%
  4. 180 - 19013%
  5. 170 - 18015%
  6. Below 17030%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Aug 2026, 05:51 UTCAnonymous Poll302 voters

📢 UGC NET Geography June 2026 – Category-wise Expected Cut-off Poll

  1. GEN 220<12%
  2. GEN 220>11%
  3. OBC 210<22%
  4. OBC 210>21%
  5. EWS 210<10%
  6. EWS 210>8%
  7. SC 200<13%
  8. SC 200>8%
  9. ST 190<7%
  10. ST 190>6%

The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

RPSC with Sunil Sir
@rpscexamwithsunilsir · 51,800
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 25 August 2026
Dr Lokesh Bali
@DrLokeshBali · 46,473
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
UGC-NET/JRF
@UGCNET_JRF_NTA · 41,880
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
Geography University Suraj Sir(Asst.Prof)🎯
@suraj_Sir_Geo · 42,135
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 29 August 2026
Unacademy Live- NTA UGC NET
@ntaugcnett · 31,573
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 6 September 2026
JRFAdda
@jrfaddaofficial · 40,456
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“JRF FACTORY🏆” (@jrffactory), 9,500 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jrffactory.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.