Channel
@PROFESSOR_ADDA
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,563subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001731714054 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PROFESSOR_ADDA |
| Description | @Professor Adda Institute #NET_Notes_PDF NET_JRF NET Paper 1 Notes NET Paper 1 MCQ @NET_Paper_1 PYQ @NET Free Notes @UGC NET Free PDF UGC NET Crash Course UGC NET Free video UGC_NET_FREE STUDY MATERIAL |
| Created | Between 1 January 2022 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PROFESSOR_ADDA |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 18,563 | -9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:52 | 18,572 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:12 | 18,573 | +9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 18,564 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 18,558 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 18,554 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 18,552 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 18,552 | first reading |
82 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 82 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 82 (6 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 36,981 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 00:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 82 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Q. If a passage presents evidence and then derives a general conclusion, the reasoning is mainly: यदि कोई अनुच्छेद प्रमाण प्रस्तुत करके सामान्य निष्कर्ष निकालता है, तो तर्क मुख्यतः है: (Paper-1)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Q. In research, which step normally follows the formulation of a research problem? शोध में शोध समस्या के निरूपण के बाद सामान्यतः कौन-सा चरण आता है? (Paper-1)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Mentorship + Updated Content is Important for NET JRF /SET 2026 students... Get Pdf notes & Free study plan today DM with Subject name 👍 👍 wa.me/+918690649619?text=TSend_me_notes_my_subject_is_📝📝 👉 Professor Adda helps with filtered study material. ✨ NET JRF में सफलता के लिए सही Mentor जरूरी है। ✨ Professor Adda के साथ मेहनत बनती है Smart Success. Click here to get FREE sample PDF Get Pdf notes today DM with S…
Q. Which network is primarily designed for sharing resources within a limited institutional area? सीमित संस्थागत क्षेत्र में संसाधन साझा करने के लिए मुख्यतः कौन-सा नेटवर्क बनाया जाता है? (Paper-1)
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Q. Which graph is generally most suitable for showing the trend of a variable over successive years? लगातार वर्षों में किसी चर की प्रवृत्ति दिखाने के लिए सामान्यतः कौन-सा ग्राफ अधिक उपयुक्त है? (Paper-1)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Q. Which situation best illustrates intercultural communication? निम्न में से कौन-सी स्थिति अंतर-सांस्कृतिक संचार को सर्वोत्तम रूप से दर्शाती है? (Paper-1)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Q. An argument that attacks the person instead of addressing the argument commits which fallacy? जो तर्क तर्क की विषय-वस्तु के बजाय व्यक्ति पर आक्रमण करता है, उसमें कौन-सा हेत्वाभास है? (Paper-1)
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Q. Which research approach primarily deals with meanings, experiences and interpretations? कौन-सा शोध दृष्टिकोण मुख्यतः अर्थ, अनुभव और व्याख्याओं से संबंधित है? (Paper-1)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Q. If a passage presents evidence and then derives a broader conclusion, the conclusion is mainly based on: यदि कोई गद्यांश प्रमाण प्रस्तुत करके व्यापक निष्कर्ष निकालता है, तो निष्कर्ष मुख्यतः किस पर आधारित है? (Paper-1)
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Q. Which factor is most directly related to learner-centred teaching? शिक्षार्थी-केंद्रित शिक्षण से सबसे प्रत्यक्ष रूप से कौन-सा कारक संबंधित है? (Paper-1)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Only Few Left ❌ ❌ ❌ Start study with premium content .... NET SET JRF ka one stop solution 👍🏻 Printable Pdf available 🔉 Get month end OFFER today 📥 Click here to Get MORE PDF & Paper 1st + Subject wise Notes📝 👇 wa.me/+919358555174?text=TSend_me_notes_my_subject_is_📝📝 PROFESSOR ADDA NOTES
📲 Study Start with High Energy NET SET exams are Coming Get One Stop Solution Kit Tell Subject & Get Combo notes if you are serious to Study 👇👇📲 wa.me/+918690649619?text=TSend_me_notes_my_subject_is_ Professor Adda is Largest Result providing institute in the NET SET Asst Professor notes segment 🔥🎉
Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @PROFESSOR_ADDA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 63 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Q. If a passage presents evidence and then derives a general conclusion, the reasoning is mainly: यदि कोई अनुच्छेद प्रमाण प्रस्तुत करके सामान्य निष्कर्ष निकालता है, तो तर्क मुख्यतः है: (Paper-1)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Q. In research, which step normally follows the formulation of a research problem? शोध में शोध समस्या के निरूपण के बाद सामान्यतः कौन-सा चरण आता है? (Paper-1)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Q. Which network is primarily designed for sharing resources within a limited institutional area? सीमित संस्थागत क्षेत्र में संसाधन साझा करने के लिए मुख्यतः कौन-सा नेटवर्क बनाया जाता है? (Paper-1)
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Q. Which graph is generally most suitable for showing the trend of a variable over successive years? लगातार वर्षों में किसी चर की प्रवृत्ति दिखाने के लिए सामान्यतः कौन-सा ग्राफ अधिक उपयुक्त है? (Paper-1)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Q. Which situation best illustrates intercultural communication? निम्न में से कौन-सी स्थिति अंतर-सांस्कृतिक संचार को सर्वोत्तम रूप से दर्शाती है? (Paper-1)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Q. An argument that attacks the person instead of addressing the argument commits which fallacy? जो तर्क तर्क की विषय-वस्तु के बजाय व्यक्ति पर आक्रमण करता है, उसमें कौन-सा हेत्वाभास है? (Paper-1)
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Professor Adda NET SET” (@PROFESSOR_ADDA), 18,563 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PROFESSOR_ADDA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.