Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ashwani Sir Testbook

Channel

Ashwani Sir Testbook

@AshwaniSir_Testbook

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,005subscribers

+189 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001930965714
TypeChannel
Username@AshwaniSir_Testbook
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AshwaniSir_Testbook

Growth

15,80916,00515,90711 August 2026 — 15,816 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,812 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,809 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,823 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,959 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,005 subscribers11 August 202618 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 7 days, net +189. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,780–16,034 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 13:4316,005+46
17 Aug 2026, 10:5315,959+136
14 Aug 2026, 12:2915,823+14
13 Aug 2026, 04:5715,809-3
12 Aug 2026, 06:0215,812-4
11 Aug 2026, 20:0115,816first reading

Engagement

126 posts held, back to 10 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.72%
avg views ÷ 16,005 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,400
104 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.268%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
126
of 126 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 34 of 104 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held126 (10 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total145,185
Reactions total135
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

135 reactions across 33 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3928.9%
🔥3123.0%
🙏2619.3%
🥰2619.3%
👏64.44%
💯42.96%
😍32.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 126 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 126 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC≈1,750 views18 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Pura answer key hi AI se check kiya hai. Why so lazy guys? Jyada students are completely relying on AI to check even basic things like answer keys. Check manually doston warna miss kardo questions.

🙏18

17 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC≈2,120 viewsread 18 August 2026

UGC NET History Answer Challengable Questions Jo bhi question problematic hai batao yaha I will challenge the questions tomorrow. Don't use AI to check the questions. Use your own mind We will be do a session tomorrow at 6 p.m https://forms.gle/34CH4rvHgF3HreEe8

17 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTCviews —

Ashwani Sir Testbook pinned «Answer keys challenge Marks kisko milenge https://youtu.be/CWDVNm_vAdE?si=6emfvn01Dr5HH5OE»

17 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC≈2,300 viewsread 18 August 2026

Answer keys challenge Marks kisko milenge https://youtu.be/CWDVNm_vAdE?si=6emfvn01Dr5HH5OE

17 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC≈2,850 viewsread 18 August 2026

🔥Your Live Class on UGC NET History Challenge Questions 2026 | UGC NET History Answer Key 2026 Challenge | Ashwani is about to start. Join Now 🔴: https://youtube.com/live/NN5Q4oZ28Ns?feature=share - Ashwani Tyagi

17 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTCviews —

Ashwani Sir Testbook pinned «History Answer keys challenges timings-6 p.m https://www.youtube.com/live/NN5Q4oZ28Ns?si=3pt7xFyUgD5knu8l»

17 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC≈2,670 viewsread 18 August 2026

History Answer keys challenges timings-6 p.m https://www.youtube.com/live/NN5Q4oZ28Ns?si=3pt7xFyUgD5knu8l

17 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTCviews —

Ashwani Sir Testbook pinned «Answer keys challenge Session at 6 p.m today https://youtube.com/shorts/5pgp68v9OCc?si=_d1DefSK3zPUYwB3»

17 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC≈2,450 views5 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Answer keys challenge Session at 6 p.m today https://youtube.com/shorts/5pgp68v9OCc?si=_d1DefSK3zPUYwB3

👍5

16 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTCviews —

Ashwani Sir Testbook pinned «UGC NET History Answer Challengable Questions Jo bhi question problematic hai batao yaha Abhi koi challenge karne ki jarurat nahi hai. We will be do a session tomorrow at 6 p.m https://forms.gle/34CH4rvHgF3HreEe8»

16 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC≈2,790 views6 reactionsread 18 August 2026

UGC NET History Answer Challengable Questions Jo bhi question problematic hai batao yaha Abhi koi challenge karne ki jarurat nahi hai. We will be do a session tomorrow at 6 p.m https://forms.gle/34CH4rvHgF3HreEe8

👍6

16 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC≈2,770 viewsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @testbook_ugcnetPhoto

🔥UGC NET JUNE 2026 Answer Key Out Hurry Check Now - https://youtu.be/dcTCVZ4pGNA?si=vmKI-aEdT1IWKll1 SANKALP 2.0 के साथ अपनी Dec 2026 की तैयारी को अभी से मजबूत करो 💪 ⏳ Price Increasing from 17 Aug ये मौका MISS मत करना! आज की सही शुरुआत = कल का Selection! 🔥

Showing the 12 most recent of 126 posts we hold for @AshwaniSir_Testbook. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 48 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Aug 2026, 03:33 UTCAnonymous Quiz204 voters

Name the campaign launched in January 2018 by the Union Minister for the environment, forest and climate change, which lauds small positive actions performed by individuals or organisations to strengthen the cause of environmental protection.

  1. 1)Green Good Deeds14%
  2. 2)Green Skill Development Programme63%
  3. 3)Clean Air Campaign14%
  4. 4)Champions of the Earth9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 03:33 UTCAnonymous Quiz171 voters

Consider the argument provided below: "Sound is permanent because it is a product like the jar" Identify the fallacy involved in the above argument on the basis of Indian logic from the options given below:

  1. 1)Fallacy of contradictory reason32%
  2. 2)Fallacy of wrong assertion25%
  3. 3)Fallacy of irrelevant reason39%
  4. 4)Fallacy of trivial reason5%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 03:33 UTCAnonymous Quiz199 voters

Which of the following is NOT a form of non-verbal communication?

  1. 1)Eye contact8%
  2. 2)Posture and body movement20%
  3. 3)Written memos70%
  4. 4)Facial expressions3%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 03:33 UTCAnonymous Quiz184 voters

What is a good alternative to ipsative assessment?

  1. 1)Norm-referenced assessment11%
  2. 2)Criterion-referenced assessment38%
  3. 3)Portfolio assessment14%
  4. 4)All of the above37%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 03:29 UTCAnonymous Quiz113 voters

Good Moorrnnninngggg Aspirants ☀️ Paper 1 ka Daily Dose 💊💪 Paper 1 | 5 Questions | Are you ready?

  1. Aaj toh topper mode on 😎81%
  2. Full josh mein ready 🔥8%
  3. Thoda revise karke aata hoon 📚8%
  4. Abhi chai peeke aata hoon ☕3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Aug 2026, 03:37 UTCAnonymous Quiz232 voters

Micro teaching is

  1. 1)Evaluation teaching31%
  2. 2)Real teaching12%
  3. 3)Scaled down teaching34%
  4. 4)Effective teaching24%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 126 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 186,110 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

E Book UPSC CSE BPSC SSC CGL CHSL Railway UP Police Haryana CET All Exam
@Ebook_UPSC_SSC_IB_Railway_Exam · 191,167
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ashwani Sir Testbook” (@AshwaniSir_Testbook), 16,005 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AshwaniSir_Testbook.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.