Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kumar Bharat - UGC-NET-Paper1

Channel

Kumar Bharat - UGC-NET-Paper1

@KumarBharatEdu

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

167,776subscribers

+14,849 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001316834707
TypeChannel
Username@KumarBharatEdu
DescriptionWelcome to our UGC-NET Paper 1 Prep Channel! Join us for daily PYQ polls, tests, expert tips, and essential exam updates. NOTICE - I HAVE LEFT UNACADEMY. DO NOT JOIN THERE FOR MY LIVE COURSES.
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/KumarBharatEdu

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@KumarBharatEdu/12752 · this entry15 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC@sunainaenglish/828215 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@KumarBharatEdu/12776 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC@sunainaenglish/830117 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@KumarBharatEdu/12785 · this entry18 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC@sunainaenglish/831018 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@sunainaenglish/840129 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC@KumarBharatEdu/12876 · this entry29 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@KumarBharatEdu/12896 · this entry31 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC@sunainaenglish/841731 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@KumarBharatEdu/13472 · this entry5 Nov 2026, 12:39 UTC@sunainaenglish/89845 Nov 2026, 12:41 UTC1.002 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@sunainaenglish40 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.96under a minutethis entry (40–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 557 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @KumarBharatEdu — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

152,927167,776160,351.57 August 202612 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 97 days, net +14,849. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 150,700–170,003 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 19:49167,776+179
10 Nov 2026, 13:44167,597+80
9 Nov 2026, 00:00167,517+4
7 Nov 2026, 15:16167,513+54
6 Nov 2026, 17:29167,459+52
5 Nov 2026, 18:17167,407+114
4 Nov 2026, 17:46167,293+163
3 Nov 2026, 19:28167,130+185
2 Nov 2026, 15:55166,945+180
1 Nov 2026, 12:37166,765+156
31 Oct 2026, 15:07166,609+155
30 Oct 2026, 12:39166,454+147
29 Oct 2026, 14:16166,307+171
28 Oct 2026, 10:07166,136+157
27 Oct 2026, 07:04165,979+208
26 Oct 2026, 08:40165,771+103
25 Oct 2026, 10:16165,668+206
24 Oct 2026, 08:29165,462+159
23 Oct 2026, 08:50165,303+144
22 Oct 2026, 07:18165,159first reading

Engagement

865 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 203 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.93%
avg views ÷ 167,776 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,600
270 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.349%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
270
of 865 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held865 (5 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total1,781,666
Reactions total6,213
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 06:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,500
Videos
≈3
Links
≈5,700

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

20,579 reactions across 865 posts, in 55 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤13,93367.7%
👍3,16715.4%
🙏1,0845.27%
🥰3611.75%
😇2791.36%
🔥2551.24%
👏2421.18%
😢1880.914%
😁1440.7%
💯1350.656%
✍1280.622%
🤔710.345%
☃670.326%
👎540.262%
🤓490.238%
😡410.199%
💔370.18%
😎350.17%
😭350.17%
👌260.126%
35 further kinds2481.21%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 865 of the 865 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,579 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 865 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 270 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 05:00 UTC766 views6 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

UGC-NET-Paper1 - PYQ Test https://kumaredu.com/PYQ-Test/UGC-NET-Paper1/4VAgfcUlKdR2x6G9FbRBW/k9oiYhFimJanyGGErc2BIx3PNgaM6PdUvrBRq8WM16czqHCIEf

❤6

13 Nov 2026, 04:00 UTC≈1,420 views2 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

⚠️ Important Notice ⚠️ This channel does NOT post any ads, investment offers, or money-making schemes. If you see any such message, it is a Telegram sponsored ad — NOT posted by us. Please do NOT click links or send money to anyone claiming to be associated with this channel. Stay safe. ⚠️ ज़रूरी सूचना ⚠️ यह चैनल कोई भी विज्ञापन, निवेश के ऑफ़र या पैसे कमाने की स्कीमें पोस्ट नहीं करता है। अगर आपको ऐसा कोई मैसेज दिखता …

❤2

13 Nov 2026, 03:00 UTC≈2,010 views22 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

उम्र आपको प्यार से नहीं बचाती। लेकिन प्यार, किसी हद तक, आपको उम्र से बचाता है। - एनाइस निन

❤17🙏3👍1🥰1

12 Nov 2026, 16:45 UTC≈3,560 views9 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Which of the following is essential for effective | UGC-NET-Paper1 | PYQ in 2 Minutes | 17119 https://youtu.be/wBVQvWafcBk

❤9

12 Nov 2026, 14:30 UTC≈4,410 views19 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Poll

Read the question above and choose the correct option.

  1. 116%
  2. 238%
  3. 330%
  4. 416%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤13😁5😇1

12 Nov 2026, 14:30 UTC≈4,320 views19 reactionsread 13 November 2026

PYQ from - UGC-NET-PublicAdmin-03-January-2025-Shift-1 Identify the forms of social desirability bias : (A) Obeserver drift (B) Impression management (C) Psychosocial effect (D) Self-deception positivity (1) (A) and (B) Only (2) (B) and (C) Only (3) (C) and (D) Only (4) (B) and (D) Only सामाजिक वांछनीयता पूर्वाग्रह के रूपों की पहचान करें: (A) पर्यवेक्षक बहाव (B) इंप्रेशन प्रबंधन (C) मनोसामाजिक प्रभाव (D) आत्म-ध…

❤16👍3

12 Nov 2026, 13:00 UTC≈4,470 views17 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

UGC-NET-Paper1 - PYQ Test https://kumaredu.com/PYQ-Test/UGC-NET-Paper1/4lYveNA4LtR1zrigEbhGW/k+oyYgDDSMYnOeBU7Q2REvxv9iY9qRdE/pBA+iXsh2dzqEDoMeHA==

❤10🙏4👍2🥰1

12 Nov 2026, 09:15 UTC≈5,120 views25 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Poll

Read the question above and choose the correct option.

  1. 133%
  2. 233%
  3. 324%
  4. 410%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤17☃5🥰3

12 Nov 2026, 09:15 UTC≈5,090 views22 reactionsread 13 November 2026

PYQ from - UGC-NET-Geography-03-March-2023-Shift-2 Match the column: A. Web 1.0 B. Web 2.0 C. Web 3.0 D. Web 5.0 I. Democratization of the capacity of action and knowledge II. Emotional web Ill. Democratization of content production IV. Democratization of information access 1. A-IV B-III C-I D-II 2. A-III B-II C-IV D-I 3. A-I B-III C-IV D-II 4. A-IV B-II C-I D-III कॉलम का मिलान करें: A. वेब 1.0 B. वेब 2.0 C. वेब …

❤19👍3

12 Nov 2026, 05:00 UTC≈5,180 views31 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

UGC-NET-Paper1 - PYQ Test https://kumaredu.com/PYQ-Test/UGC-NET-Paper1/5VMsftA4LNRwybigE7lFWvk+pConCjSPb32eHlPe2xQqxvpmZNuRdEjuBwWiWcp0dSGZDYAUG1Q=

❤17👍7🥰5🙏2

12 Nov 2026, 04:00 UTC≈5,500 views5 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

⚠️ Important Notice ⚠️ This channel does NOT post any ads, investment offers, or money-making schemes. If you see any such message, it is a Telegram sponsored ad — NOT posted by us. Please do NOT click links or send money to anyone claiming to be associated with this channel. Stay safe. ⚠️ ज़रूरी सूचना ⚠️ यह चैनल कोई भी विज्ञापन, निवेश के ऑफ़र या पैसे कमाने की स्कीमें पोस्ट नहीं करता है। अगर आपको ऐसा कोई मैसेज दिखता …

❤5

12 Nov 2026, 03:00 UTC≈5,180 views54 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

कोई भी आपके ऊपर विश्वास नहीं करेगा जब तक कि आप अपने आप पर विश्वास नहीं करते। - लिबेराचे

❤43👍8💯2🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 865 posts we hold for @KumarBharatEdu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 4 posts on @KumarBharatEdu as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
30 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
18 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
18 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 6 most recent of 198 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Nov 2026, 14:30 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,420 voters approx.

Read the question above and choose the correct option.

  1. 116%
  2. 238%
  3. 330%
  4. 416%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Nov 2026, 09:15 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,520 voters approx.

Read the question above and choose the correct option.

  1. 133%
  2. 233%
  3. 324%
  4. 410%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Nov 2026, 14:30 UTCAnonymous Quiz2,040 voters approx.

Read the question above and choose the correct option.

  1. 19%
  2. 223%
  3. 363%
  4. 45%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Nov 2026, 09:15 UTCAnonymous Quiz2,190 voters approx.

Read the question above and choose the correct option.

  1. 155%
  2. 221%
  3. 312%
  4. 412%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Nov 2026, 14:30 UTCAnonymous Quiz2,220 voters approx.

Read the question above and choose the correct option.

  1. 158%
  2. 218%
  3. 38%
  4. 416%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Nov 2026, 09:15 UTCAnonymous Quiz2,560 voters approx.

Read the question above and choose the correct option.

  1. 121%
  2. 231%
  3. 330%
  4. 418%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 865 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

JRFAdda
@jrfaddaofficial · 41,975
#1
SCHOLAR'S MANTRA - THE PHYSICAL EDUCATION ACADEMY 👩‍🎓👨‍🎓📚
@scholarsmantra · 14,597
#2
Global Online UGC NET
@globalOnlinechannel · 8,607
#3
UGC NET by Rajat Sir
@ugcnetbyrajatsir · 18,534
#4
GYANADDA UGC NET JRF
@gyanaddabysm · 35,559
#5
AHAM Educational Channel (Official)
@eduaham · 1,217
#6
Anurag Sharma Political Science
@netcrackersclasses · 1,987
#7
Pradyumn Tripathi Sir Testbook
@pradyumansir_testbook · 31,285
#8
Heena Dawar Ma'am Testbook
@Heenamaam_testbook · 6,173
#9
Sunaina Jethani
@sunainaenglish · 17,230
#10
Philosophical study📚
@Philosophical_Study · 6,012
#11
Neha Taneja_Life Science
@nehacsirlifescience · 5,200
#12
Niks Niharika NTA UGC NET
@Niksniharika · 9,781
#13
NET GSET
@NETGSET · 5,667
#14
My Learners
@NETJRFLITERATURE · 521
#15
UGC NET JRF NTA CSIR
@UGC_NET_JRF_NTA_CSIR · 130,784
#16
MyProfessorNote UGC NET English
@myprofessornoteUgcntanet · 10,382
#17
UGC NET NTA CSIR JRF SO
@UGC_NET_JRF_NTA_CSIR_SO · 143,901
#18
Study Hamare sath
@davindersir · 8,298
#19
Homescience UGC NET/JRF(2023) RPSC Assistant Professor
@Home_Science_2023 · 2,546
#20
UGC NET Paper 1 | Testbook SuperCoaching
@tulikamam · 15,107
#21
Rashmi@JRFGuru NOTIFICATIONS
@rashmijrfguru · 1,491
#22
MOHIT SHARMA CLASSES
@ms00007sharma · 18,202
#23
Political Science UGC NET CUET Professor
@PSYJRF · 12,985
#24
Priti Ma'am Testbook
@pritipaper1 · 25,489
#25
ugc_net_jrf_csir_nta
@UGC_NET_JRF_1st_Papers · 4
#26
UGC net mass communication and journalism
@ugc_net_mass_communication · 2,035
#27
Nav Classes NET JRF
@navclasses · 26,108
#28
Nisha Mittal Computer Science
@nishamittal · 2,262
#29
UGC NET MENTOR
@ugcnetmentor · 19,388
#30
SET/NET- 2026
@SetNetStudy · 29,703
#31
Literature Lovers YouTube
@LiteratureLoversTelegram · 28,718
#32
Dr Lokesh Bali
@DrLokeshBali · 45,113
#33
Reema Nayyar
@Reema_Nayyar · 7,272
#34
PW UGC-NET
@pwugcnet · 47,942
#35
सम्पूर्ण हिन्दी व्याकरण
@sampurna_hindi_vyakaran · 211,570
#36
Commerce Net Achievers
@commercenetachievers · 73,983
#37
PHD RESEARCH IN ACCOUNTANCY & COMMERCE
@phd_thesis_research_plagiarism · 1,536
#38
Professor Adda NET SET
@PROFESSOR_ADDA · 18,934
#39
Political Science with Arif Khan
@polsciencewitharifkhan · 1,591
#40
SS ODIA TUTORIAL NTA NET/JRF ODIA
@ntanetpaper2odia · 7,224
#41
Dara Sir Suratgarh
@Darasirsuratgarh · 2,356
#42
Rediscover UGC NET
@rediscovereducation · 6,135
#43
Psycheso
@psy_cheso · 707 (as read 12 August 2026)
#44
Sanskriti Jain Official || Political Science || CUET PG
@sanskritimamofficial · 3,881
#45
BIHAR EDUCATIONAL NEWS
@bihar_educational_news · 1,068
#46
PHD NOTIFICATION ONLY ( Ugc Net Jrf Phd )
@Phdnotificationonly · 21,113
#47
Priyanka Ma'am Testbook
@PriyankaMaamTestbook · 23,517
#48
Political Science by Shahbaz Lucky
@Politicalsiencebyshahbazlucky · 2,287
#49
Psychology specific Update..🕵‍♂
@Psyupdt · 1,499
#50
NET/JRF Psychology by Dr. Farah
@ugcnetpsychologyforall · 7,454
#51
Ravi Dagar Updates
@HCS2022PreExam · 3,347
#52
The Sanghi Millenial.
@thesanghi · 1,027
#53
Philosophy is Virtue [study material]
@philosophyfornetjrf · 1,220
#54
BIHAR DELED 2026 | BIHAR DELED | ADEO | BSSC | ASO | OFFICE ATTENDANT | RAILWAY EXAM | BPSC TR4
@bihar_ssc_adeo_aso · 2,754
#55
AIR 52, Jayasree Pradhan
@jayasreepradhan · 5,808
#56
JYOTI KUMARI
@jyotieducator · 9,270
#57
News Inshorts
@inshortschannel · 4,616
#58
Commerce Hub
@commercehubb · 1,961
#59
RPSC-RSSB & DSSSB
@RPSC_UGC_NET · 4,150
#60
UGC NET History by Ashwani
@ugc_net_history_ashwani · 7,102
#61
📚📚ALL COMPETITIVE EXAM@ PRELIMS+ MAINS 2025/26📚📚
@all_prelmains · 5,455
#62
SANSKRITI IAS
@sanskritiias · 56,196
#63
UPSC Environment Ecology Agriculture Notes
@UPSC_Environment_Ecology_Notes · 35,719
#64
JOHAR EDU CAMPUS
@Johareducampusbyrkpandey · 5,528
#65
Life of 64 squares : UPSC, Chess and more.
@rahulsri064 · 12,494
#66
Ph.D Group by Aarti Prajapati
@Phd_by_AartiPrajapati · 4,401
#67
The Gorchakov Fund
@GorchakovFund · 1,337
#68
IYES Foundation | Youth Opportunities & News
@iyesf_org · 1,730
#69
Farsi books
@farsi_pdfbook · 795 (as read 12 August 2026)
#70
learn Persian
@learningPersian · 3,624
#71
Memes about philosophy
@politsofia · 1,047
#72
AIOU INFOs اوپن یونیورسٹی
@aiouinfo · 610 (as read 12 August 2026)
#73
👍NEWZ INDIAN REGIONAL @newzindian
@newzindian · 5,683
#74
👏 MAGAZINES AROUND THE WORLD @allmagss
@allmagss · 13,759
#75
Wonderful World
@tgwondworld · 3,915
#76
PhotoliciousWorld
@photolic_world · 3,194
#77
Grow sports with sidd
@allabout_physicaleducation · 2,004
#78
RPSC Assistant professor BY Dr. Beniwal
@AP2023POLSCI · 3,194
#79
ONLY JRF🎯💯
@onlyjrf2023 · 1,321
#80
Guru Chauhan GK
@guruchaungk · 3,598
#81
Poet's Corner
@POETSCORNERS · 1,947
#82

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

JRFAdda
@jrfaddaofficial · 41,975
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
GYANADDA UGC NET JRF
@gyanaddabysm · 35,559
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 1 September 2026
SET/NET- 2026
@SetNetStudy · 29,703
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 7 September 2026
Pradyumn Tripathi Sir Testbook
@pradyumansir_testbook · 31,285
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 6 September 2026
UGC NET NTA CSIR JRF SO
@UGC_NET_JRF_NTA_CSIR_SO · 143,901
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
UGC NET JRF NTA CSIR
@UGC_NET_JRF_NTA_CSIR · 130,784
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 August 2026
ugc_net_jrf_csir_nta
@UGC_NET_JRF_1st_Papers · 4
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
Literature Lovers YouTube
@LiteratureLoversTelegram · 28,718
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 9 September 2026
Professor Adda NET SET
@PROFESSOR_ADDA · 18,934
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 October 2026
Professor Academy 💎
@ProfessorAcademy · 26,319
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 September 2026
Dr Lokesh Bali
@DrLokeshBali · 45,113
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
Commerce Net Achievers
@commercenetachievers · 73,983
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
Nav Classes NET JRF
@navclasses · 26,108
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 September 2026
Priti Ma'am Testbook
@pritipaper1 · 25,489
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 September 2026
Priyanka Ma'am Testbook
@PriyankaMaamTestbook · 23,517
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 September 2026
UGC NET MENTOR
@ugcnetmentor · 19,388
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 October 2026
PW UGC-NET
@pwugcnet · 47,942
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
सम्पूर्ण हिन्दी व्याकरण
@sampurna_hindi_vyakaran · 211,570
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
RAJASTHAN UP LDC exam 2023
@RajasthanExam_2025 · 95,212
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kumar Bharat - UGC-NET-Paper1” (@KumarBharatEdu), 167,776 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KumarBharatEdu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.