Не зря ходил в качалочку
Channel
Позитиф
@positifffff
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
49subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001396967960 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @positifffff |
| Description | Шутки, приколы, мемы, мемасики... |
| Created | Between 1 May 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/positifffff |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 49 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:09 | 49 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 February 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 June 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 107
- Videos
- 49
- Links
- 33
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 7m 32s
- Average length
- 1m 05s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Срочно!!! Новое обращение Оксаны Марченко!!!! 😆😆😆
Photo, posted without a caption
Боевые утки ver 2.0 Гендиректор объединения всех американских биолабораторий в Украине доктор Комаровский представил новое биологическое оружие У-2 Детали: "Боевая птица способна провести этническую зачистку территории с помощью высокоточного помета, наводимого на русский язык. Жителям Белгорода, Воронежа и Курска не позавидуешь".
ЗСУ🇺🇦😂😂😂
Та й таке.
Все-таки вони НЕ даремно боялися. БІЙТЕСЯ!!! Бійці пташиного фронту вже проходили навчання!!
Новый эпизод «Масяни! об актуальном: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx_N8AJiKw
‼️‼️Треба поширити!‼️‼️ Нещодавно по іспанському телебаченню показували цю жінку з дитиною хворою на рак ,вона в Чернігові в госпіталі , треба знайти її якось, зв’язатися з нею, в Іспанії є людина яка повністю оплатить лікування дитини . Зі Львова ми можемо відправити її автобусом в Іспанію, хто знайде дзвоніть на номер 0965269896 ДЯКУЄМО ЗА ПОШИРЕННЯ !🙏🏻❤️
Photo, posted without a caption
рАсія зможе перемоги!! Але на наступній Паралімпіаді! 😂 Але це не точно 😉 Подробиці у відео:
Скоро вместо 🍔🍟🍦 макдональдс по всей ра'Сеи. Новое меню😂😂😂
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @positifffff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@balkanossiper · 28,6631 postColonelcassad
@boris_rozhin · 743,7681 postПозывной Брюс
@brussinf · 109,5771 postЧВК Медиа
@chvkmedia · 25,4481 post338
@go338 · 144,3371 postBeregini
@hackberegini · 85,6291 postСеверяночка
@lady_north · 6,6561 postАндрей Медведев
@MedvedevVesti · 185,0281 postМИГ России
@mig41 · 476,3341 postВоенный Осведомитель
@milinfolive · 615,4981 postНеофициальный Безсонов
@NeoficialniyBeZsonoV · 246,4281 postOMON Moscow
@omonmoscow · 9,4441 postСистемный пестицид
@pezdicide · 11,2941 postВаршавская русалка
@pl_syrenka · 14,5181 postДимитриев
@russ_orientalist · 129,4611 postРыбарь
@rybar · 1,545,8381 postZERGULIO
@SergeyKolyasnikov · 446,1031 postСИЛОВИКИ 🇷🇺
@SIL0VIKI · 184,9231 postАмериканскiй номеръ
@usaperiodical · 17,6941 postВладлен Татарский
@vladlentatarsky · 175,8031 postКрылья войны
@wingsofwar · 23,9551 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@positifffff named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026 · confirmed gone 8 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Позитиф” (@positifffff), 49 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/positifffff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.