Channel
@pezdicide
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11,144subscribers
-166 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001794711668 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pezdicide |
| Description | Кто, кому и за что платит. Рассказываем всю подноготную вредителей-иноагентов, нежелательных организаций, прочих расследователей и доброжелателей, опасных для современного общества. @pezdicide_feedback_bot |
| Created | 7 December 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 56 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pezdicide |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @pezdicide/4117 · this entry26 Oct 2026, 07:05 UTC | @evropar/338426 Oct 2026, 13:21 UTC | 1.00 | 6.3 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @evropar | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 1.6 hours | this entry (6–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 51 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 June 2026 to 9 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
13,600 average views per post against 11,157 subscribers — an engagement rate of 122.2%. Across the 21,335 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.84% and 23.6%, with a median of 12.1%.
| Window | 30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 13 of 13 published in the window (2 exact, 11 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 177,220 |
| Mature posts only | 131.9% over 12 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 11,157 measured 4 November 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000:rus · 21,335 channels · p10 2.94% · p25 5.84% · p50 12.1% · p75 23.6% · p90 42.5% |
| Position in cohort | 99.588th percentile · 10.1× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.306% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 92.3% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the keys clone_source · err_high, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 22:14 | 11,144 | +1 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 10:50 | 11,143 | -6 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 06:28 | 11,149 | -3 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 09:09 | 11,152 | -5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 07:09 | 11,157 | -1 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 04:38 | 11,158 | -1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 02:30 | 11,159 | +1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 02:56 | 11,158 | +8 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 04:58 | 11,150 | -1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 09:36 | 11,151 | -4 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:18 | 11,155 | -4 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 03:15 | 11,159 | -3 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 04:01 | 11,162 | -2 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 02:07 | 11,164 | -4 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 00:36 | 11,168 | -2 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 22:06 | 11,170 | -3 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 19:46 | 11,173 | -3 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 10:50 | 11,176 | -16 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 08:00 | 11,192 | -9 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 18:20 | 11,201 | first reading |
51 posts held, back to 3 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 51 (3 June 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 170,440 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Nov 2026, 21:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (16.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📝Экология распила📝 Когда западное финансирование российской несистемной оппозиции столкнулось с глухой стеной уголовных дел, профессиональным борцам за прекрасную Россию пришлось срочно менять маскировку. На смену открытым митингам пришли две безотказные схемы: тайный «психологический детокс» для выгоревших оппозиционеров и спекуляция на местных экологических конфликтах. Первая трогательная история развернулась вок…
📝Новая редакционная линия📝 Как экстремисты из-за рубежа прокачивают «народные» инфоресурсы в России В Башкортостане некогда развлекательный ресурс «Халык знает», набравший местную аудиторию на высмеивании социальных проблем, становится звеном антироссийской информационной кампании. Это яркий пример того, как зарубежные кураторы научились, что называется, играть в долгую, сопровождая и накачивая «спящие» информячейки…
📝Семейный подряд📝 на распиле чужой легитимности Лучший способ похоронить оппозиционный миф — это выпустить его главного мученика на свободу и дать ему микрофон. Сергей Тихановский, отсидев пять лет в колонии и оказавшись в эмиграции, развил бурную блогерскую деятельность и принялся методично вколачивать гвозди в политический гроб собственной супруги. В своих многочасовых стримах из солнечного Лос-Анджелеса он прямы…
📝Витрина для беглого проповедника📝 Пару лет назад на примере проповедника ваххабизма и террористических идей Ишмурата Хайбуллина мы с коллегами показали, что религиозную литературу подобных деятелей спокойно можно приобрести на российских маркетплейсах. И вот — конкретно этого товарища уже и иноагентом признали — а книжки его всё так же продаются на тех же маркетплейсах и интернет-магазинах. Минюст России признал Х…
📝Редакция на выход📝 что последует за закрытием «Новой газеты» «Новая газета»* объявила, что 9 ноября выключает серверы и гасит свет в своей московской редакции. Тридцать лет этот медийный орган функционировал как инструмент мягкой силы и вредительства внутри страны. Под вывеской «честной журналистики» и защиты прав человека там методично отрабатывали западную повестку, системно дискредитировали армию, смаковали люб…
📝По ту сторону фактчекинга📝 Когда западные структуры упаковывают классическую информационную войну в модную обертку «фактчекинга» и «борьбы с дезинформацией», на выходе получается идеальный оксюморон. Проект Beyond Propaganda («По ту сторону пропаганды») на поверку оказался банальным инструментом этой самой пропаганды, причем самого топорного пошива. На днях Минюст РФ внёс проект в реестр иностранных агентов. За кр…
📝Не спорьте с бюджетным ботом📝 Журналистское расследование Натали Винтерс вскрыло детали программ HATEDEMICS и ее преемника ECLIPSE с общим бюджетом свыше 4 млн евро из фондов Евросоюза. За вывеской борьбы с «языком вражды» и конспирологией скрывается масштабная система мониторинга и прямого вмешательства в сетевые дискуссии. Алгоритмы платформы уже пропылесосили свыше 10 млн сообщений в европейском сегменте соцсет…
📝Виза в американский карцер📝 Российские просители убежища, штурмовавшие границу США ради спасения от «авторитаризма», в полной мере ощутили прелести оплота демократии. Теперь они объявляют голодовки в техасских изоляторах, выпрашивая воду и возможность попасть к стоматологу. Иммиграционный центр El Valle в Техасе стал уже третьей тюрьмой ICE за месяц, где вспыхнул коллективный протест с участием россиян. К пятнадца…
📝Ботофермы братской помощи📝 Европейские спецслужбы годами ищут «руку Кремля» за каждым уличным митингом, пока у них под носом Киев собирал собственную диверсионную фабрику. В сеть утекли документы украинских силовых структур, проливающие свет на масштабную кампанию по дестабилизации общественно-политической обстановки в ЕС — прежде всего в Венгрии и Румынии. ➡️Ключевой фигурой полевых медиа-диверсий, как указывают …
📝Политика наградного сезона📝 У признанной в РФ террористки Юлии Навальной снова праздник: очередная премия за борьбу, которую, судя по публичному календарю, в этом году почти никто не видел. Испанский фонд FAES вручил ей XIII премью «за защиту свободы, человеческого достоинства и фундаментальных прав». Награду она разделила с кубинской активисткой Розой Марией Пайя и иранской журналисткой Масих Алинеджад. Церемонию…
📝Вера с проверкой лояльности📝 В Литве решили проверить православные приходы на предмет гибридной угрозы. Вдруг свечи в храме горят без согласования с Вильнюсом. Центр Libertas Fidei представил в Сейме республики исследование о «рисках» структур Московского патриархата для Литвы и Европы. Его автор Сергей Шумило утверждает, что церковная сеть может использоваться для политического влияния, пропаганды и даже разведыв…
📝Урок английского📝 с геополитическим приложением Когда в Лондоне говорят, что хотят улучшить образование в Средней Азии, имеют в виду не только учебники, методики и квалификацию учителей. В своей образовательной программе в британском МИД чётко прописали: английский должен стать «противовесом российскому влиянию» в регионе. Проект AEAR–CA действует в Казахстане, Киргизии, Таджикистане, Туркмении и Узбекистане с 202…
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @pezdicide. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 50 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Системный пестицид” (@pezdicide), 11,144 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pezdicide.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.