Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Американскiй номеръ

@usaperiodical

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17,694subscribers

-50 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001297608614
TypeChannel
Username@usaperiodical
DescriptionМодный политический журнал
Created28 April 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/usaperiodical

Growth

17,69417,74417,7196 August 2026 — 17,744 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,744 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,739 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,732 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,731 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,718 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,712 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,699 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,694 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -50. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,687–17,752 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:3517,694-5
11 Aug 2026, 18:1617,699-13
10 Aug 2026, 18:0117,712-6
9 Aug 2026, 17:2217,718-13
8 Aug 2026, 16:5117,731-1
7 Aug 2026, 18:5217,732-7
6 Aug 2026, 19:5517,739-5
6 Aug 2026, 02:1717,744no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:0417,744first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.7%
avg views ÷ 17,694 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,330
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held11 (1 July 202625 July 2026)
Views total27,980
Reactions total504
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,990
Videos
2,790
Links
3,910

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 42s
Average length
1m 26s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,161 reactions across 11 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁42036.2%
🤣20517.7%
🔥13411.5%
12110.4%
🎉534.57%
👏494.22%
🤡433.70%
👍413.53%
💊242.07%
🥴141.21%
🤮80.689%
🕊70.603%
🍌60.517%
🍾60.517%
😢60.517%
🙈50.431%
👀30.258%
💯30.258%
🌚20.172%
👎20.172%
6 further kinds90.775%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,161reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 10:40 UTC≈4,170 views126 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Если бы не Дональд Трамп, ничего бы этого не было. @usaperiodical

😁106👍96💯3🕊2

17 Jul 2026, 07:50 UTC≈8,910 views259 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🇺🇸🇷🇺 Мужик рассказал, как в 2008 году реднеки из Южной Каролины подорвались среди ночи, выкатили свои пикапы и стали загружать в них свое оружие. На вопрос, куда они среди ночи собрались, реднеки ответили, что «Россия вторглась в Джорджию», поэтому они едут на границу штата останавливать русских. В результате они вернулись и рассказали, что на границе штата их потом стопанули и объяснили, что речь идет «о какой-то

🤣200😁395💊5🔥5🌚1👍1🕊1

16 Jul 2026, 05:43 UTC≈14,900 views119 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🇺🇸 Если вы когда-нибудь задумывались о том, есть ли у американцев своя версия вопроса «Чей Крым?», то ответ — да, есть. Звучит она «Кто победил на выборах 2020 года?» Тут в Конгрессе состоялись слушания кандидата на пост директора Национальной разведки Джея Клейтона и его мучали этим вопросом. Расчет хитрый: если Клейтон ответит «Байден», он тут же будет записан в трамповский список «непорядочных». А если заявит, чт

😁86💊196🤣5🕊2😐1

13 Jul 2026, 12:05 UTC≈5,740 views39 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🇺🇸📱Ну-ка, за что там Трампушка в очередной раз стряс денег со своих любимых избирателей? @usaperiodical

😁30👀32🥱2🌚1🕊1

12 Jul 2026, 06:24 UTC≈12,600 views236 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 Все думали, что первым умрет Митч Макконнелл, а сегодня умер признанный в России террористом и экстремистом сенатор-русофоб Линдси Грэм. Ну законопроект о новых санкциях против России все-таки внести на рассмотрение успел. @usaperiodical

🔥111👏49🎉46😁14🍾6😢6🤪21

8 Jul 2026, 04:36 UTC≈12,300 views91 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 Политические издания всерьёз это обсуждают. Такое днище... @usaperiodical

😁66🤡13🍌6🙈5👍1

7 Jul 2026, 06:41 UTC≈16,800 views21 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🇺🇸 Здесь важно отметить, что до недавнего времени Платнера демократы поддерживали, даже несмотря на определённые токсичные моменты. Но прошел месяц, и всякого компромата уже накопилось столько, что демократы, как водится, переобулись в воздухе и потребовали непутевого политика отказаться от дальнейшего участия в выборах. Слишком сильный шлейф негатива, который будет с радостью использован республиканцами. @usaperi

🔥144👍3

5 Jul 2026, 07:41 UTC≈10,900 views83 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🇺🇸🎆Соединенные Штаты отпраздновали свой 250-й день рождения. Нынешняя администрация умело этим воспользовалась, перехватив инициативу в организации главного праздника страны. Изначально планированием должна была заниматься двухпартийная комиссия, созданная еще в 2016 году. Однако союзники президента организовали собственную группу Freedom 250 и полностью подчинили мероприятие консервативной повестке. Стоит признать

🤡29😁26👍15🎉73🗿2💩1

3 Jul 2026, 07:48 UTC≈10,800 views32 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸🇪🇺 В прессе пустили слухи, что глава Пентагона Пит Хегсет готовил настоящую бомбу для недавней встречи министров обороны стран НАТО в Брюсселе, состоявшейся 17-18 июня. Хегсет собирался объявить о масштабном сокращении американских войск в Европе, которое вышло бы далеко за рамки уже отмененной отправки бронетанковой бригады из техасского Форт-Худа в Польшу и недавнего вывода американских пехотинцев из Румынии. В

😁244👍3🔥1

2 Jul 2026, 06:16 UTC≈5,310 views136 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🇺🇸🇷🇺🗽Русские руферы Ангелина Николау и Иван Кузнецов покорили сердца американцев — весь Нью-Йорк только и говорит об этом перфомансе. Поначалу американцы напряглись, что на Эмпайр Стейт Билдинг залезли какие-то радикалы, прямую трансляцию крутили по всем каналам. Но потом ребята развернули баннер с надписью «Когда сила любви побеждает любовь к власти, мир познает мир». А в довершении всего Иван сделал Ангелине предл

85😁24🥴14🤮8🔥3👎2

1 Jul 2026, 16:05 UTC≈10,100 views19 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🇺🇸 Согласно отчетам Федеральной избирательной комиссии (FEC), комитет политического действия Pro-Choice Majority Action выделил около $1,5 миллиона на поддержку ДеГетт. Большая часть поддержки этой группы поступила от EDW Action Fund — комитета политического действия, в число доноров которого входят произраильский DMFI PAC и United Democracy Project, связанный с Американо-израильским комитетом по общественным связям

👍95😁5

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @usaperiodical. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 322,061 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Американскiй номеръ” (@usaperiodical), 17,694 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/usaperiodical.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.