ما همه زود قضاوت میکردیم درسته اینا هنوز هیچی نشده بورسشون ول شده . پس ایران که سال ها تحریم بوده و همیشه تو کشور ترور . اقدمات تروریستی اینا توش انجام میشده بورسش باید چجوری میشد . اینا اکه جای ایران بودن قطعا بورسشون به نفت میرسید
👍28❤11👎8

Channel
@gold_signaalll
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,275subscribers
-264 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001062101604 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gold_signaalll |
| Description | ما فقط پیشنهاد دهنده هستیم و نظر شخصی خود را اعلام میکنیم. مسئولیت هرگونه سود و زیان چه در کانال عمومی چه در خصوصی به هر دلیلی بر عهده شما میباشد و شما با قبول این موضوع عضو شده اید و ما تحت هیچ شرایطی مسئولیتی در مقابل سود و زیان شما نخواهیم داشت |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 49 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gold_signaalll |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 21:01 | 21,275 | +1 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 18:28 | 21,274 | +9 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 23:59 | 21,265 | +10 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 23:58 | 21,255 | +15 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 00:07 | 21,240 | -12 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 22:31 | 21,252 | -10 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 19:39 | 21,262 | +3 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 16:07 | 21,259 | -7 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 12:46 | 21,266 | +1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 14:30 | 21,265 | -6 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:26 | 21,271 | +1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:46 | 21,270 | +4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:20 | 21,266 | -2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 15:56 | 21,268 | -4 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 13:36 | 21,272 | +7 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 11:59 | 21,265 | +1 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:00 | 21,264 | -10 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 09:16 | 21,274 | +2 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 08:58 | 21,272 | -11 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 10:20 | 21,283 | first reading |
190 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 46 of 48 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 190 (3 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 84,573 |
| Reactions total | 944 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 02:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,808 reactions across 181 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,110 | 55.4% | |
| 👍 | 1,137 | 29.9% | |
| 👏 | 233 | 6.12% | |
| 👎 | 229 | 6.01% | |
| 👌 | 99 | 2.60% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 182 of the 190 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,808 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 190 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 48 posts held from the last 30 days (14.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
ما همه زود قضاوت میکردیم درسته اینا هنوز هیچی نشده بورسشون ول شده . پس ایران که سال ها تحریم بوده و همیشه تو کشور ترور . اقدمات تروریستی اینا توش انجام میشده بورسش باید چجوری میشد . اینا اکه جای ایران بودن قطعا بورسشون به نفت میرسید
👍28❤11👎8
بورس کره هم پدیده عجیبیه شاخص بورسشون از سقف خودش 47 درصد ریخته!
❤11👎1
‼️ ️ریزش بیسابقه بورس آمریکا/ ۲ تریلیون دلار از ارزش بازار کم شد! فقط در عرض ۴۰ دقیقه، شاخص S&P ۵۰۰ اکنون ۲ تریلیون دلار از ارزش بازار خود را از دست داده است. کل روند صعودی پس از انتخابات میاندورهای، در عرض چند دقیقه از بین رفته است. این یکی از سریعترین کاهشهای ارزش بازار در تاریخ بازار سهام است.
❤10
#پیشنهاد__سهم_اختصاصی_ویژه میزان بازدهی 100% از این لحظه بازار به شکلی شده دیگه نباید هر سهمی رو بخری باید سهمی بخری که مشخصات زیر که این سهم ویژه هست رو داشته باشه . جهش فروش داشته باشه از رشد بازار عقب باشه تعدیل مثبت سود خالص سنگین داشته باشه رونق فروش و تقویت حاشیه سود خالص عدم وابستگی به تامین مواد اولیه و فروش محصولات . سهم #ویژه تمامی مشخصات بالا رو دارد و یک گزینه عالی برای سود کردن هست . جهت اطلاع…
❤5👎1
هیچکس را نمیتوان از خوابی نجات داد که هنوز باور دارد بیداریست. بعضیها از تاریکی نمیترسند… از نوری میترسند که مجبورشان میکند آنچه را باور کردهاند، دوباره ببینند «برای زندانی کردن انسانها، نیازی به دیوار نیست… کافیه کاری کنی که همه، یک مسیر رو برن… و اسمش رو بذارن آزادی!» خیلی از سهم های من بهشت و خوشبختی واقعی رو به خیلی ها نشان داد اما خیلی ها مسیر بهشت رو انتخاب نکردن . نمیتوان به زور کسی را وارد مسیر خو…
❤32👍10👌2
در تحلیل حدث آینده نگری بنیادی شرکت با دیتاهای کنونی دو سبک محاسبه وجود دارد ؟ سبک ماهانه : این مدل با تجمیع عملکرد ماهانه و آخرین صورت مالی فصلی و با فرض ادامه روند عملکرد تا پایان دوره مالی،به تخمین عملکرد تا پایان سال مالی میپردازد سبک گذشته نگر : این مدل با اتکا به دادههای تاریخی و عملکرد گذشته شرکت، و با تعمیم آن به آخرین صورت مالی، مبنای تخمین عملکرد سالانه را فراهم میسازد. در سبک ماهانه #فهامون احت…
❤23👍6
از زمان معرفی #مادیرا تا الان سهم 35% شارپ رشد کرده اونم در بازار منفی که سهم ها اصلاح کردن . بدترین چیز تردید هست اونم تردید بر منطق تردید
❤28👏5
مشخص بود دیروز بازار با کمبود فروشنده مثبت شد . بازار باید با قدرت خریدار مثبت بشه تا پایدار بمونه
❤16👏3
#وامیر یک سوم ارزشش در حال معامله است اونم دلاری چرا ؟ چون تمامی شرکت هایی که دارن دلاری میفروشن و محصولاتشونم تماما دلاری هست
❤11👍9
#فهامون صف خرید سنگین بدون عرضه کننده
❤7👍4
ارزش روز سهام ها ی #وامیر در بورس تقریبا 19 همت هست . همچنین وامیر مالک 100% شرکت املاک و ساختمان امیر هست که همین شرکت 2 درصد فزر 1% فسوژ و 1.5% کربن رو داره و ارزش روز پرتفوی این شرکت هم 3500 میلیارد تومان هست یعنی وامیر تقریبا 23 همت ارزش روز دارائی بورسیش هست الان خودش به چه ارزشی در حال معامله است 8 همت یعنی یک سوم
❤18
🔵 #وامیر 🔻سود انباشته احتمالی 800 میلیارد تومان 🔻مالکیت 50% در #کاما(کنسانتره سرب و روی) 🔻مالکیت 34% در #فسوژ (کنسانتره سرب و نقره) 🔻مالکیت 100% در #توسعهاملاکوساختمانامیر( که همین شرکت 2% فزر و هچنین 1% فسوژ و 1.5% درصد کربن در اختیار دارد) 🔻مالکیت 1.3% در #فزر (طلا) مالکیت 100% در سهام #صندوقبازارگردانیاختصاصیکیان (1.5% فسوژ، 11% کربن) 🔻مالکیت 51% در #کیمیافرآورانزرین 🔻مالکیت 17% در #معادناسفندقه #وامیر ه…
❤18👏3👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 190 posts we hold for @gold_signaalll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@gold_signaalll edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 7 posts on @gold_signaalll as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تک سهم های مطمئن” (@gold_signaalll), 21,275 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gold_signaalll.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.