Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Анна Ованесова | О карьере и жизни

Channel

Анна Ованесова | О карьере и жизни

@ovanesova_career

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

632subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002148508334
TypeChannel
Username@ovanesova_career
CreatedBetween 1 April 2024 and 31 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ovanesova_career

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

619632625.57 August 2026 — 619 subscribers8 August 2026 — 619 subscribers15 August 2026 — 623 subscribers24 August 2026 — 624 subscribers31 August 2026 — 628 subscribers18 September 2026 — 632 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 43 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 617–634 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 14:16632+4
31 Aug 2026, 21:36628+4
24 Aug 2026, 05:04624+1
15 Aug 2026, 15:52623+4
8 Aug 2026, 00:50619no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:31619first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 22 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

273 reactions across 16 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥10237.4%
❤7928.9%
👍5419.8%
👏82.93%
🆒51.83%
😭41.47%
🤯41.47%
🎉31.10%
💯31.10%
🏆20.733%
💩20.733%
🙉10.366%
🙏10.366%
🤓10.366%
🤔10.366%
🤨10.366%
🤩10.366%
🥰10.366%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 273 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ovanesova_career. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 April 2026 to 22 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 06:03 UTC154 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥8👍4❤3😭1🙉1

20 Jul 2026, 15:37 UTC169 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Записала серию уроков про ИИ для курса по поиску работы 😎 Нейросети (даже бесплатные) и мой бот выручают на самых нервных этапах поиска: проверить, насколько ваше резюме попадает в вакансию, собрать досье на компанию перед собеседованием и "прожарить" профиль на LinkedIn. В боте я пошла дальше - он собирает вакансии по множеству tg-каналов, агентств и карьерных сайтов (не hh единым 🤫), отбирает лучшие и присылает б…

🔥13🏆2👍2💩1🙏1🆒1

18 Jul 2026, 06:59 UTC204 views46 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Сегодня двойной праздник 🎉 По календарю День счастливого человека. Но для меня 18 июля давно особенная дата: сегодня родился мой любимый муж. С днём рождения, любимый 🧩 И это тот самый случай, когда за весь список счастья отвечает один человек 🕯 Ну а раз день такой, ловите мой личный список для счастья: три книги, три фильма, три песни и несколько неочевидных поводов для счастья. 📖 Три книги 📍 Джеймс Холлис, «Пер…

❤24🔥12👍6🎉3💩1

20 Jun 2026, 12:16 UTC320 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Спасибо за кейсы 💛 Планировали одну небольшую задачку в Excel решить, а в итоге собрали целый инструмент для аналитики с дэшбордами и программу, которая сама заполняет документы. Засиделись дольше, чем рассчитывали, но результат супер получился! 🔥

👍2🤩1

20 Jun 2026, 12:16 UTC328 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Аня, спасибо большое за встречу. Было очень полезно. Так хочется быстрее реализовать идея, а приходится ехать гулять с подругой 😃

❤2👍1

19 Jun 2026, 14:18 UTC338 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сюрприз 🎁 Встреча по Claude и автоматизации всё-таки состоится, проведем завтра В субботу в 11:15 встречаемся камерной группой на 40 минут. Разберём автоматизацию в Excel и, если успеем, заглянем дальше. 🔗 Подключение: Zoom До встречи! 💛 PS. записи не будет

👍9🔥7❤1

16 Jun 2026, 15:54 UTC361 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Встреча про Claude Code в этот раз не собралась ☹️ Идею не закрываю, если есть вопросы по - пишите в комментарии 💛

😭3

14 Jun 2026, 07:09 UTC374 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Отмечайте все подходящие варианты

  1. Вторник, 16 июня в 19-0038%
  2. Пятница, 19 июня 19-0025%
  3. Суббота, 20 июня 17-0038%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Jun 2026, 07:07 UTC345 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Огоньков под постом оказалось столько, что отступать некуда 🔥 Собираемся камерной группой «повторяй за мной»: Claude Code, терминал, первый skill. Без теории, под девизом: заинтересовать, вовлечь и не напугать Предлагайте идеи бесячих задач, которые хочется автоматизировать в комментариях И выбираем время, отметьте все слоты, которые вам подходят ⬇️ Upd записи точно не будет, чтобы спокойно можно было на разные т…

❤4

10 Jun 2026, 14:45 UTC384 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🏙 Бесплатно и за пару минут узнать, насколько ваше резюме бьётся с конкретной вакансией Друзья, помните, я искала добровольцев на тестирование бота? Спасибо всем, кто поделился обратной связью и попробовал! 💛 🔴Итак, представляю моего ИИ-помощника по резюме: @Career_Check_bot. Загружаете резюме и вакансию, бот показывает, насколько вы подходите и что доработать, чтобы попасть на интервью. 🔍 Бесплатно за 2 минут…

🔥13❤6👍6🤔1🆒1

9 Jun 2026, 15:09 UTC277 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Технологии, меняющие мир найм Сын поступает в новую школу 📚 На дне открытых дверей школы я впервые узнала о том, как сегодня проходят дистанционные экзамены. Камера следит за глазами. Микрофон ловит посторонние голоса. Программа фиксирует, если ты отвёл взгляд, открыл вкладку или в комнату кто-то вошёл. Это называется проктеринг — цифровой надзор за честностью 🔍 Конечно, мне пришла мысль, что такая технология при…

❤12👍4🤯4🤨1

9 Jun 2026, 07:03 UTC208 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Попала в подборку «Говорят первые» (выпуск №9) вместе с сильными авторами про управление, найм и переговоры. Делюсь с вами ⬇️

❤4

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ovanesova_career. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Jun 2026, 07:09 UTCAnonymous Poll8 voters

Отмечайте все подходящие варианты

  1. Вторник, 16 июня в 19-0038%
  2. Пятница, 19 июня 19-0025%
  3. Суббота, 20 июня 17-0038%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2026 to 22 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

Управление подчинёнными на 100%: бизнес-тренер Анна Гулимова
@agulimova_management · 792
1 post
Читай Хачатурова
@Alex_Khachaturov_HRD · 3,888
1 post
Алла Лукавенко, HR эксперт, ментор управленцев, подбор персонала
@alla_lukavenko · 185
1 post
Мария Арманд ⚜️Управление Оргразвитие ИИ
@armand_power · 2,018
1 post
будни коуча•Ульяна Селиванова
@coach_selivanova · 7,905
1 post
Антон Бобров | Цифровая рабочая среда (Digital Workplace)
@digital_workplace · 5,491
1 post
Катины заметки🖋 люди в деле
@Ekaterina_Hr_notes · 3,975
1 post
🎙️Татьяна Покидько | Pro HR на ДВ
@hrdv_vl · 1,601
1 post
НИУ ВШЭ: Доктор профессиональной практики в стратегическом управлении и психоанализе социальных систем
@hsedpp · 798
1 post
Светлана Петровичева | про найм
@itrecruiting · 11,854
1 post
Адаптация и наставничество|Анна Чибисова
@onboardingwell · 2,163
1 post
Лайфхаки управленца. Сергей Вепренцев
@sdexp · 1,493
1 post
Охотники за талантами
@talent_hunters · 17,744
1 post
Карьерный Путь с Анастасией Климчук🍀🍀🍀
@worklifewithlove · 1,609
1 post
WOW выступления с Лидией Спевак Ораторское
@WOWLidiya · 12,198
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Анна Ованесова | О карьере и жизни” (@ovanesova_career), 632 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ovanesova_career.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.