مِن الحيل المحرمة تسمية الشيء المحرَّم بغير اسمه: قال ابن القيم رحمه الله: • بابُ الحيل المحرمة مَدارُه على تسمية الشيء بغير اسمه، وعلى تغيير صورته مع بقاء حقيقته، ... فإن المحلِّل مثلًا غَيّر اسم التحليل إلى اسم النكاح، واسم المحلِّل إلى الزوج، وغيَّر مُسمّى التحليل بأن جعل صورته صورة النكاح، والحقيقةُ حقيقة التحليل ... وكذلك المفسدة العظيمة التي اشتمل عليها الربا، لا تزول بتغيير اسمه من الربا إلى المعاملة، ولا بتغي…

Channel
وارفة العلم
@omarFM1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
64,773subscribers
-2,581 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001726910069 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @omarFM1 |
| Description | ومن للحق يجلوه إذا كُلَّت أيادينا. نشر العلم الشرعي على نهج السلف الصالح |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/omarFM1 |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 00:56 | 64,773 | -366 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 03:21 | 65,139 | -107 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 65,246 | -88 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:59 | 65,334 | -96 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:42 | 65,430 | -113 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 65,543 | -199 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:16 | 65,742 | -106 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:19 | 65,848 | -59 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:04 | 65,907 | -52 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:46 | 65,959 | -66 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 66,025 | -39 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 66,064 | -56 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 66,120 | -57 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 66,177 | -26 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 66,203 | -59 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 66,262 | -50 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 66,312 | -83 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 66,395 | -99 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 66,494 | -62 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:52 | 66,556 | first reading |
Engagement
168 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.15%
- avg views ÷ 64,773 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 745
- 78 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.447%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 91
- of 168 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 51 of 78 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 168 (19 July 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 58,087 |
| Reactions total | 184 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 04:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,870
- Videos
- ≈1,000
- Links
- ≈1,060
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2m 58s
- Average length
- 45s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
409 reactions across 96 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 153 | 37.4% | |
| 💯 | 111 | 27.1% | |
| 🏆 | 101 | 24.7% | |
| 👏 | 42 | 10.3% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 0.489% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 98 of the 168 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 411 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 168 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
مِن صور التحايُل على الربا: قال ابن القيم رحمه الله: النبي ﷺ قال: «إنما الأعمال بالنيات، وإنما لكل امرئٍ ما نوى» الحديث. وهو أصلٌ في إبطال الحِيَل، ... • فإنَّ مَن أراد أن يعامل رجلًا معاملةً يعطيه فيها ألفًا بألفٍ وخمسمائة إلى أجَلٍ، فأقرَضَه تسعمائة، وباعه ثوبًا بستمائة يساوي ألفًا؛ ⏎ إنما نوى بإقراض التسعمائة تحصيل الربح الزائد، وإنما نوى بالستمائة التي أظهَر أنها ثمن الثوب الربا. والله يعلم ذلك من جِذْر قلبه، وهو…
مسْخ المُتحايلين على المحرمات قردةً وخنازير: قال ابن القيم رحمه الله: فالمسخ على صورة القردة والخنازير واقع في هذه الأمة ولا بدّ، وهو واقعٌ في طائفتين: علماء السوء الكاذبين على الله ورسوله، الذين قلبوا دين الله تعالى وشرْعَه، فقلبَ الله تعالى صُورَهم، كما قلبوا دينه. والمجاهرين المتَهَتِّكين بالفسق والمحارم. ومن لم يُمْسَخْ منهم في الدنيا مُسخ في قَبره، أو يوم القيامة ... قال شيخنا [يعني ابن تيمية] رحمه الله: وإنما ذ…
خطورة التحايل على المحرمات: قال ابن القيم رحمه الله: • هؤلاء [يعني المتحايلين على الشرع، كأصحاب السبت] لما كانوا أعظم جُرْمًا، إذ هم بمنزلة المنافقين، ولا يعترفون بالذنب، بل قد فَسدَت عقيدتهم وأعمالهم = كانت عقوبتهم أغلظ من عقوبة غيرهم. • فإنَّ مَن أكل الربا والصيد المحرَّم عالمًا بأنه حرام فقد اقترن بمعصيته اعترافُه بالتحريم، وهو إيمان بالله تعالى وآياته، ويترتب على ذلك مِن خَشْيَة الله تعالى، ورَجاء مَغْفِرته، وإمك…
أنواع الحِيَل وأحكامها: قال ابن القيم رحمه الله: • الحِيَل نوعان: ¤ نوع يُتَوَصَّل به إلى فِعل ما أمر الله تعالى به، وترك ما نهى عنه، والتخلُّص من الحرام، وتخليص الحق من الظالم المانع له، وتخليص المظلوم من يد الظالم الباغي. ⏎ فهذا النوع محمودٌ يُثاب فاعله ومُعَلِّمه. ¤ ونوع يتضمن إسقاط الواجبات، وتحليل المحرّمات، وقلب المظلوم ظالمًا والظالم مظلومًا، والحق باطلًا والباطل حقًا. ⏎ فهذا النوع الذي اتفق السلف على ذمِّه، و…
من اللفتات البلاغية في قوله تعالى: (أَلَیۡسَ ٱللَّهُ بِكَافٍ عَبۡدَهُۥۖ وَیُخَوِّفُونَكَ بِٱلَّذِینَ مِن دُونِهِۦ وَمَن یُضۡلِلِ ٱللَّهُ فَمَا لَهُۥ مِنۡ هَادࣲ) أنه بقدر عبودية المرء لله تكون الكفاية والحفظ والعناية، وعبر بالاسم الظاهر (عبده) دون الضمير بكاف الخطاب للنبي ﷺ رغم نزول الآية فيه لنكتة التشريف بالعبودية، والتعليل بأن سبب الحفظ هو العبودية، ثم حصل التشريف بالخطاب المباشر للنبي ﷺ بالالتفات (ويخوفونك) لأنه ﷺ…
👍1
الموت حق لابد تذكر الموت. في كل لحظة هي مسألة وقت وترحل لابد تكون مستعد للفراق الذي. لابد منه هذه حقيقة أنت تعلمها لكن تحاول تتناساها لكن لا مفر منها اللهم احسن خاتمتنا.
💯5👍2🏆1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍2
من الحِكَم والأسرار في تشريعات الطلاق: قال ابن القيم رحمه الله: والله سبحانه شرع الطلاق على أيسر الوجوه وأرْفَقها بالزوج والزوجة؛ لئلا يتسارع العبد في وقوعه، ومفارقة حبيبه، ومَدَّ له وقتَ العدة أجلًا؛ لاستدراك الفارِط بالرجعة. فلم يُبِحْ له أن يُطلق المرأة في حال حيضها؛ لأنه وقت نُفرته عنها، وعدم قدرته على استمتاعه بها، ولا عَقِيبَ جماعها، لأنه قد قَضى غرضه منها، وربَّما فَتَرت رغبته فيها، وزهد في إمساكها لقضاء وطره،…
👍2💯1
بيان كيفية الطلاق الشرعي: قال ابن القيم رحمه الله: الطلاق الذي شرعه الله سبحانه أن يُطلِّقها طاهرًا من غير جماع، ويطلِّقها واحدة، ثم يدَعَها حتى تنقضي عِدّتُها: فإن بَدَا له أن يُمسكها في العِدَّة أمسكها. وإن لم يراجعها حتى انقضت عدَّتها أمكنه أن يستقبل العَقْد عليها من غير زوج آخر. وإن لم يكن له فيها غرض لم يَضرَّه أن تتزوج بزوج غيره، فمَن فعل هذا لم يندم، ولم يَحْتَجْ إلى حيلة ولا تحليل ... • وقد روى النسائي عن محم…
👍1
الطلاق في الأصل مبغوضٌ إلى الله محبوبٌ إلى الشيطان: قال ابن القيم رحمه الله: والله سبحانه يُبغض الطلاق في الأصل: • كما روى أبو داود من حديث عبد الله بن عمر رضي الله عنهما قال: قال رسول الله ﷺ: «أبغضُ الحلال إلى الله الطلاق». • وفي «سنن ابن ماجه» من حديث أبي موسى رضي الله عنه قال: قال رسول الله ﷺ: «ما بالُ قومٍ يلعبون بحدود الله، يقول: قد طلَّقتُكِ، قد راجعتُكِ، قد طلقتُكِ، قد راجعتُكِ؟». • وفي «صحيح مسلم» عن جابر بن …
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 168 posts we hold for @omarFM1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@omarFM1 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 9 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@books_p · 176,347#1
@adhamsharkw · 94,355#2
@thrthrat97 · 151,472#3
@garan456 · 1,210#4
@kalemat77 · 15,188#5
@uv_41 · 484,973#6
@ubg876 · 613#7
@httpstmeZ4p_MXYMNntiZWRk · 836 (as read 21 August 2026)#8
@Arabsaid · 52,981#9
@tale_map · 13,618#10
@hhhieee · 389,823#11
@moon_5w · 54,502#12
@v_xvx0 · 20,732#13
@doaataltawhed · 4,086#14
@twir_thatk · 58,899#15
@snap_kato370 · 33,382#16
@shaghaf_qaria · 5,308#17
@fadakrr · 35,495#18
@ruutrgy · 141,503#19
@nassemochawq · 13,969#20
@kutab_1 · 58,148#21
@rii2v · 3,467#22
@manarat_alola · 72,747#23
@rahj_al_sanabiik · 1,540#24
@tvquran · 27,204#25
@kitabat_6 · 70,359#26
@snom7 · 3,991#27
@pink_letters_0 · 197,001#28
@qlbelrrbee · 3,668#29
@binmouti · 9,295#30
@alpahri_90 · 29,980#31
@mi7bara · 30,972#32
@moslyati_yhya · 36,344#33
@ENEHME · 39,363#34
@Ak_tebas · 219,868#35
@aehfazazkarak · 15,595#36
@Mention_of_God · 46,149#37
@tareehk1 · 36,684#38
@drzahoraaa9 · 346,734#39
@oiiiii9 · 77,686#40
@HadyAlrooh · 17,734#41
@Drr_baherat · 43,576#42
@kotof3manya · 16,163#43
@ASEEEMM · 371,759#44
@ASEEEM2 · 160,198#45
@ASEEM6 · 273,691#46
@kalideo · 371 (as read 21 August 2026)#47
@uuuuxcc · 217,719#48
@Yosmo · 280,088#49
@nbd111111 · 37,667#50
@NNNAA · 448,685#51
@TTTTpT · 485,992#52
@adhamsharkawii1 · 83,869#53
@ShatharatPal · 120,836#54
@jjjiig · 129,804#55
@nnZnn · 330,207#56
@xmamxa · 14,954#57
@TTTpT · 260,916#58
@O8O8OO · 32,120#59
@QNQNQP · 28,856#60
@httpsmrwanalshaba · 966#61
@w_0vl · 15,027#62
@sosahmo · 13,026#63
@Hltalm4 · 28,602#64
@psychology_F · 308,495#65
@Qmutafaqqih · 521#66
@ARABMIIMIIA · 22,824#67
@llyl7 · 428,723#68
@DHIIFBMKF2 · 196,776#69
@KIKIKL1 · 18,393#70
@differentvip · 3,811#71
@Rwaea3 · 42,778#72
@llh_x · 17,345#73
@abo_altyabb · 35,892#74
@iraq11e · 316,050#75
@zzizi · 257,814#76
@kotobah1 · 5,928#77
@zzzxx · 425,808#78
@zzssz3 · 188,008#79
@boook_quotes · 37,731#80
@ggaago · 21,631#81
@zzssz8 · 45,369#82
@alym_2 · 95,661#83
@T0T20 · 25,504#84
@tg2ra · 93,352#85
@makta_ba · 9,216#86
@ZzIzZI · 41,911#87
@ktbMAlshreef · 3,852#88
@Cryptonews_Thefirst · 9,604#89
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@adhamsharkw · 94,355
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
@v_xvx0 · 20,732
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 26 September 2026
@twir_thatk · 58,899
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
@snap_kato370 · 33,382
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 4 September 2026
@klm_at · 47,625
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 26 August 2026
@kutab_1 · 58,148
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
@books_p · 176,347
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 12 August 2026
@Quranyjannatyofficial · 174,235
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
@kitabat_6 · 70,359
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
@Ak_tebas · 219,868
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
@hhhieee · 389,823
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
@moslyati_yhya · 36,344
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 1 September 2026
@Hltalm4 · 28,602
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
@O8O8OO · 32,120
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 5 September 2026
@moon_5w · 54,502
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
@tareehk1 · 36,684
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 September 2026
@ENEHME · 39,363
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
@jzzzjm · 92,169
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 August 2026
@manarat_alola · 72,747
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
@TradingGeniuses · 42,914
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 28 August 2026
@storyonly3 · 64,478
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
@oiiiii9 · 77,686
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
@T0T20 · 25,504
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 13 September 2026
@ARABMIIMIIA · 22,824
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 47 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“وارفة العلم” (@omarFM1), 64,773 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/omarFM1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.