Channel
@Ak_tebas
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
225,087subscribers
-908 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001798007381 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ak_tebas |
| Created | Between 1 January 2022 and 31 December 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ak_tebas |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:55 | 225,087 | -142 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 225,229 | -121 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 225,350 | -135 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 225,485 | -131 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 225,616 | -166 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 225,782 | -138 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:10 | 225,920 | -75 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 225,995 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 January 2026 – 18 July 2026) |
| Views total | 15,860 |
| Reactions total | 51 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
373 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 358 | 96.0% | |
| 😍 | 7 | 1.88% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 1.61% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 0.536% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 373reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 January 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
و يظل الرجل يخرج للدنيا بدروعِه وسيفِه ولا يهتز لمصائب الدنيا وضرباتها، حتى يُظَن أنه صخر لا قلب له! 🗿🛡️ حتى يلقاها -هي دون سواها- فيلقى أسلحته ويخلع درعه فترى جراحه! 💔🤕 هي فقط.. من يأتمنها على جراحه! 🥺❤️🩹
❤15💔2
من ذاق الحرام، فقد لذّة الحلال ولو أتاه إلى بابه.. 🚫✨ الحرام يسرق شيئًا لا يُرى، يسرق براءة الشعور، صدق النظرة، ونقاء القلب.. 💔👁️ يتركك بذاكرة مشوشة، وقلبٍ لم يعد ينبض بالدهشة.. 🌀💓 حتى إذا أتاك الحلال، طرق بابك طاهرًا، نقيًّا، استقبله قلبك الباهت دون شغف.. 🚪🕊️ لأن الذوق تغيّر، لأن النفس أُشبعت بما لا يُشبع، ولأن الحرام يُفسد الإحساس كما تُفسد قطرة سمٍّ كوبًا من الماء النقي.. 🍵🦠 فإن أردتَ أن ترى الحلال جميلًا كما …
❤7
بينما كان الظلام يلف المكان في ليلةٍ هادئة، جلس رجلٌ يراجع أعمال يومه، فشعر بضيقٍ في صدره بسبب خطأٍ ارتكبه دون قصد. ظل يتقلب في فراشه، يؤرقه هذا الشعور، حتى قام وتوضأ في جوف الليل. سجد بين يدي الله، وبكى بصدق، مناجياً ربه بكلماتٍ بسيطة: "يا رب، أعلم أنك ترحم من في الأرض، فكيف بمن يلجأ إليك في ظلام الليل؟". في تلك اللحظة، هدأ قلبه تماماً، وشعر بسكينةٍ عجيبة تغمره. تذكر حينها قول الله تعالى: "وَهُوَ الَّذِي يَقْبَلُ ال…
❤11
كان هناك طائرٌ صغيرٌ يقضي كل وقته في محاولة تعليم نفسه الطيران بين أغصان الشجرة العالية، بينما كانت بقية الطيور قد اتخذت من أعشاشها مكاناً للراحة. سخر منه رفاقه، قائلين إنّ جناحه الصغير لن يحمله بعيداً. لم يكترث الطائر لكلامهم، بل استمر في محاولاته اليومية، يسقط تارةً ويعود للمحاولة تارةً أخرى، حتى جاء يومٌ عاصف، واضطر الجميع للهروب والبحث عن ملاذ آمن، لكن الطائر الصغير، بفضل تدريبه المستمر وقوة جناحه التي بناها بالص…
❤7
اللهم في هذا الليل، أسألك أن تريح قلبي بما أنت به أعلم، وأن تصرف عني شتات العقل والتفكير. اللهم إنّي استودعتك راحة بالي وما في قلبي، فاجعل لي من كل ضيق مخرجاً، ومن كل هم فرجاً. اللهم يا من تقول للشيء كن فيكون، حقق لي ما أتمنى، واكتب لي الخير في أيامي القادمة، واجعل لي من توفيقك نصيباً في دراستي وفي كل أمور حياتي. يا رب، إنّي أسألك في هذه الساعة أن تغفر لي ولوالدي، وأن تمنّ عليّ بالصحة والعافية، وأن تجعل هذه الليلة طم…
❤5
اللهم دبر لنا من الجبر والعوض ما ينسينا ويرضينا ..
ما هو المسجد الذي يُعد ثاني القبلتين؟
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Video, posted without a caption
❤4
هل استغفرت الله اليوم ؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤58🥰2
Signed @T_SanAa
تزاحمت النِعَم "ثلج وشعبان" و ربٌّ مُجيب "اللهمّ حقّق مافي قلوبنا" #تذكير سورة الكهف.💜
❤36😍7
Signed @T_SanAa
"زيِّنوا ليلة الجمعة بالصلاة على النَّبِيِّ ﷺ" 💜
❤24
Signed @T_SanAa
اللهم في يوم الجمعه إرزقنا إستجابة لدعائنا وأمانينا إلمنتظره💜
❤23
Signed @T_SanAa
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Ak_tebas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ما هو المسجد الذي يُعد ثاني القبلتين؟
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
هل استغفرت الله اليوم ؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 January 2026 to 18 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 343,219 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“محتوى ثقافي عبارات رسائل خواطر” (@Ak_tebas), 225,087 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ak_tebas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.