لعشاق الادب ❤️🗞

Channel
خواطر و عبارات كبرياء بداوه
@DHIIFBMKF2
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
203,696subscribers
-1,077 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001215835043 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DHIIFBMKF2 |
| Description | هنا نجمع بين تطوير الذات شموخ الكبرياء وسخرية الواقع.. نكتب بعزة نفس ونضحك بذكاء ... تواصل @Eghgdjbot |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DHIIFBMKF2 |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 203,696 | -209 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:22 | 203,905 | -114 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:50 | 204,019 | -166 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 204,185 | -178 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 204,363 | -174 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 204,537 | -184 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:40 | 204,721 | -52 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 204,773 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 204,773 | first reading |
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 21 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.60%
- avg views ÷ 203,696 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,250
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.842%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (21 May 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 16,245 |
| Reactions total | 136 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 686
- Videos
- 163
- Links
- 121
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
824 reactions across 22 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 465 | 56.4% | |
| 👍 | 198 | 24.0% | |
| 👌 | 143 | 17.4% | |
| 🤝 | 16 | 1.94% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.243% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 824reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 23 we hold a reading for · 9%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DHIIFBMKF2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 May 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
" خسرت نفسي وأنا أحاول إسعاد غيري، والآن أخسر الآخرين وأنا أحاول إسعاد نفسي".."
👍11👌4
"مازلتُ أتعافى من أشياء لم أخبر أحدًا عنها،"
❤5👍3
" اذا رأيت الله يحرمك من نعيم الدنيا ويكثر عليك الشدائد والمحن فـأعلم انك عزيز عليه "
❤76
" توقّف عن ملاحقة الشيء الخاطئ الشيء الصحيح لا يتطلب الركض."
❤24👍10🤝3
" كيف يستطيع المرء ان يهرب من اشياء تركض في راسه طوال الوقت."
❤32👌6👍6
" احيانا لا نعلم اين نسير ولكننا نكمل ونحن نامل ان نجد نهايه تنسينا مشقه الطريق."
❤28👌11
https://t.me/boost/DHIIFBMKF2
❤2
" "القرارات التي تصنعها الكرامة صائبة حتى وإن أوجعت "
❤31👌17
"ظننت أنها مشاجرة بسيطة بيننا كالعادة ؛ لكنها كانت النهاية."
❤20
" بالغ في حب " زوجتك وأبنائك حتى يقال عنك مسحور..!" "فلا أحد يبقى معك للنهايه ويكون سندك إلا ' أسرتك الصغيره "
❤74👍31👌6
" عندما تريد أن تمتلك شيئا "لم تمتلكه من قبل يجب عليك "أن تفعل شيئا "لم تفعله من قبل "
👍22❤20👌12
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @DHIIFBMKF2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 107,407 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 44 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@nertooi · 1373 postsأفضل البرامج على الإطلاق™
@apkk1 · 1,3392 posts💗
@astorenut · 262 postsمبتسۧ͜سمه‘رغم ,ـﺂلـﺂلم♪.ء
@cvhbdhhhdknmmmm · 532 posts💜 همس المشاعر💜
@Eof_for_all · 252 postsانت عشقي
@fdiusjud · 1,0132 posts[❣ӧgɺב❣шɹ̤шLבỈ ❣]
@Feelingssweet · 2,0002 posts💖عٌذِب💖ً آلَکْلَآمً 💖
@gahxjkhy · 1362 posts❤️ هـمــسـات❤️راقـــيـه❤️
@gmohhvgj · 942 posts🇦🇮Speak English fluently 🇱🇷
@learning_for_future · 2972 postsلـ فقيــدي.
@oii4i · 492 postsقصف كروي😂🔥
@qasfkorawi · 532 posts😍مقتبسات ❤️رمزيات❤️خواطر😍
@amal9976 · 571 post🥀🤓إبتسامه مشرقه🥀🤓
@dfgjjkitdfhkcsazvjhgvcxzfy · 1661 postمهلاً يا قدر✨
@eaallh · 1141 postاشعاار عاشق
@ehsaselhob · 2,5751 postلصمتي حكاية.@؟
@Formysilence · 1681 postثم مأإأذأإأ ؟؟!😔💜
@Hamalif · 2041 postڔوح ﺑــريئـﮩﮪ
@RoOhBreeaa · 1321 postبك نستعِين
@smaaeejee · 4451 postسنلتقي يوماً ما :$
@snltqy_youmn_ma · 4821 postآضــحگ وخــلي آلهہمــ لي😔
@taqqq415 · 2101 postمقولات مشاهير
@tmeAYdJsbot · 1,8721 post➳❥❬ لنكن معاً🌸❭
@tota00as · 9271 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@zznzzv · 174,191#1
@llhjk2 · 5,903#2
@N_N71 · 412,284#3
@Crazygroup2023 · 2,510#4
@ioewoi · 3,640#5
@o_v_c_v · 2,691#6
@uv_41 · 497,960#7
@ASEEEMM · 385,266#8
@ZF6gkRX39E82YjNk · 2,634#9
@m5dreen · 8,811#10
@mi_ii_ji · 811#11
@TTTTpT · 499,438#12
@NNNAA · 459,271#13
@EX2_0 · 6,023#14
@Excellencyy244 · 1,255#15
@a1ooooxxxxx · 22,240#16
@sultaniiiiii123 · 5,682#17
@Saz2e · 472#18
@DI_Il2 · 5,381#19
@Reellaaaax · 32,669#20
@zrpjdhsjvwj · 681#21
@Alkiinngg · 10,128#22
@Fi_51 · 16,711#23
@ma_L7ii · 18,902#24
@asiejs6 · 2,025#25
@Yosmo · 286,231#26
@hfggghjj · 283,850#27
@hhhieee · 401,726#28
@like_llooosh · 3,762#29
@VY716 · 13,965#30
@ON_VER · 2,310#31
@gsvsvw · 285,572#32
@a_espresso · 8,539#33
@Aiham5karam · 2,073#34
@Li555na77 · 29#35
@yypyy · 851,137#36
@nnZnn · 337,967#37
@mythrobtaiz · 5,998#38
@vwwuv · 10,155#39
@W_A_TIN · 742#40
@mtd7knish · 234,276#41
@uuuuxcc · 207,147#42
@xrnzz · 6,188#43
@S_B_l_S · 2,123#44
@ggbbaaa2023 · 12,565#45
@HADILBET · 331,218#46
@Words_Men · 122,663#47
@Malath_AlroOoh · 212,263#48
@sanayemeni · 26,221#49
@KRt9m · 3,103#50
@YYYY29 · 5,323#51
@ppppdu · 182,000#52
@x_5j_o · 10,429#53
@ASEEEM2 · 164,497#54
@aa774513 · 1,428#55
@HHHH4V · 2,520#56
@qqm5555 · 1,241 (as read 11 August 2026)#57
@PVTNFS · 625,020#58
@SSSS0_0 · 94,697#59
@WWISS0 · 46,364#60
@iaaaaa · 687,865#61
@llyl7 · 440,785#62
@zahre2000 · 290,270#63
@oee_eee · 52,774#64
@m8sdtxx · 379,552#65
@HFKYLPP · 181,417#66
@zzssz3 · 193,533#67
@ececeo · 198,793#68
@iraq11e · 324,342#69
@alyemeno · 12,050#70
@ruutrgy · 145,322#71
@STORS5 · 292,775#72
@fffrdfj · 111,802#73
@TTTpT · 267,031#74
@uv_vz · 320,927#75
@maqay11 · 10,009#76
@VIP_I9_2 · 2,385#77
@omarFM1 · 67,013#78
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@zznzzv · 174,191
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 August 2026
@AS7RM · 159,810
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
@hhhieee · 401,726
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
@zv_vb · 268,656
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
@titit1 · 151,346
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
@uv_41 · 497,960
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 August 2026
@HFKYLPP · 181,417
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
@uv_vz · 320,927
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
@Zdtyu34 · 261,162
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
@ppppdu · 182,000
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
@fraindz · 279,295
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
@N_N71 · 412,284
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
@gsvsvw · 285,572
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
@HADILBET · 331,218
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
@uv_43 · 205,985
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
@Towarddream8 · 296,610
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
@ASEEEM2 · 164,497
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
@uv_42 · 207,080
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
@m8sdtxx · 379,552
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 August 2026
@bbe_different · 331,266
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
@ASEEEMM · 385,266
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
@llyl7 · 440,785
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
@hfggghjj · 283,850
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
@k757kn · 345,355
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 33 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خواطر و عبارات كبرياء بداوه” (@DHIIFBMKF2), 203,696 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DHIIFBMKF2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.