Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 62 days, net -4,744. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 66,334–72,502 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Oct 2026, 23:14
67,046
-364
4 Oct 2026, 13:21
67,410
-723
26 Sept 2026, 03:39
68,133
-558
19 Sept 2026, 05:35
68,691
-198
16 Sept 2026, 18:19
68,889
-130
14 Sept 2026, 20:20
69,019
-138
13 Sept 2026, 05:16
69,157
-139
11 Sept 2026, 09:40
69,296
+806
8 Sept 2026, 17:19
68,490
-311
5 Sept 2026, 09:57
68,801
-171
3 Sept 2026, 10:44
68,972
-105
2 Sept 2026, 08:34
69,077
-100
1 Sept 2026, 11:33
69,177
-94
31 Aug 2026, 12:27
69,271
-111
30 Aug 2026, 09:34
69,382
-58
29 Aug 2026, 12:26
69,440
-84
28 Aug 2026, 15:04
69,524
-113
27 Aug 2026, 16:52
69,637
-43
26 Aug 2026, 14:58
69,680
-132
25 Aug 2026, 12:02
69,812
first reading
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 10 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 132 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.9%
avg views ÷ 67,046 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,700
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.414%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 October 2026
Posts held
65 (10 February 2026 – 9 October 2026)
Views total
224,408
Reactions total
929
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Oct 2026, 16:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
591
Videos
29
Links
518
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
3,720 reactions across 65 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
741
19.9%
👍
484
13.0%
🔥
455
12.2%
🎉
448
12.0%
🤩
442
11.9%
🥰
257
6.91%
💯
239
6.42%
😍
219
5.89%
😁
215
5.78%
❤🔥
212
5.70%
👏
5
0.134%
👀
1
0.027%
😨
1
0.027%
🤣
1
0.027%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,720 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 9 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💰 Digital income without the headache: 5 passive income ideas
Passive income isn't a myth. Especially if you bet on digital products. Here's what actually
works in 2025:
🔘 Political merch Print-on-Demand
Topics that stir emotions sell well. People don't buy a thing — they buy an idea and self-identification. Plus, it's viral content without ad spend.
🔘 Financial templates and trackers
A budget for students, a trad…
💰 5 ways to earn passive income without investment (and without a 9–5)
If you thought passive income was impossible without startup capital — here's a list of methods that actually work. All legal, no warehouses, no investments.
🔘 Rent out your voice
💬 Platforms like 11Labs buy real voices for AI
💬 You just record a sample — they pay every time someone uses it
💬 No microphone or audience needed
🔘 Dropshipping with…
💰 AI commerce — your chance at $1,000 a day (and a 100k prize)
AI is already changing markets, replacing people, and creating new millionaires every day. And while 99% just watch, here's a strategy for those who want to claim their share.
🔘 Why not an agency, software, or coaching?
All those models are complex, require experience or time.
AI commerce — simple, fast, and with minimal investment.
🔘 What is AI comme…
💸 Print-on-Demand: the path to $10,000/month from scratch and without ads
88% of millionaires are small business owners. But 80% of such businesses die within 5 years. How do you avoid that scenario? Simple answer — a POD store on Etsy. Minimal investment, maximum potential.
🔘 What it is
You create a design → upload it to a mug/t-shirt/poster via Printify → a customer buys → the item is printed and shipped without …
💰 6 ways to earn passively (that you probably haven't thought of)
Everyone talks about "passive" income, but what actually works is leveraged income. That's when you create value once — and earn from it again and again. Below are 6 non-obvious ideas that actually work in 2025.
🔘 Spotify playlists
Build a themed playlist, gain followers — and earn: долго о
💬 Artists pay to have their tracks featured or subscribe to …
💸 How to earn $400k per month from a small YouTube channel
Forget about millions of subscribers. Here are 2 cases where people make tens (and hundreds!) of thousands from channels with fewer views than your Reels.
🔘 Case 1: Spencer Palu
💬 8,300 subscribers
💬 3–6k views per video
💬 Sells access to a private community for $999/month
💬 Just 403 members → income: $400k/month
📌 The channel posts once a week. Focus on th…
💰 5 truly passive ways to make money in 2025
Want your money to keep working even while you sleep or travel? Here are 5 strategies that don’t require daily monitoring:
🔘 Cash ETF
💬 Price barely fluctuates — around $50
💬 Pays 2.5–2.8% annual dividends monthly
💬 No downside risk and no taxes (in a TFSA)
🔘 Print on Demand with no upfront investment
💬 Designs on hoodies, T-shirts, mugs
💬 Platforms: Etsy, Shopify + …
💰 How to earn $50k+ per month without being a blogger or having a team
You won't believe it, but $6M was made simply in chats — no website, no launches, no million-follower avatar. The method is called the "two-engine model," and it works even with 600 subscribers.
📌 What is this model?
⚫️ Magnet + Money — two blocks that turn attention into payment
⚫️ It doesn't matter how many followers you have. What matters is…
💸 7 Passive Income Strategies in Crypto
🔘 Dividend-paying tokens
— How it works: Hold tokens and receive a share of the platform's revenue (like dividends).
— Example: KCs token holders on the Ccoin platform receive a portion of trading fees daily.
— Risk: Income depends on the platform's success. Regulatory changes can affect value.
🔘 Airdrops
— What it is: Free tokens that projects distribute as a promotional cam…
💰 How to earn in crypto without trading
Many think the only way to make money in crypto is to buy low and sell high. But there are passive strategies that generate income without constant trading. Here's a breakdown of the main ones.
🔘 Staking
The simplest and most reliable option. You lock up crypto (e.g., Ethereum, Cardano, Solana) in a wallet or pool and earn rewards for supporting the network. The longer you s…
💰 How to make money with dropshipping using AI and a minimal budget
Dropshipping with AI is a simple and accessible way to start earning, even with a limited budget. Here's a step-by-step breakdown of a successful case where the entire process cost $1 for setup and $50 for promotion.
🔘 Creating the store with AI
— Tools: Build Your Store helps you create a free Shopify store.
Process:
— Register on the platform an…
💰 How to earn in crypto without trading
Many think the only way to make money in crypto is to buy low and sell high. But there are passive strategies that generate income without constant trading. Here's a breakdown of the main ones.
🔘 Staking
The simplest and most reliable option. You lock up crypto (e.g., Ethereum, Cardano, Solana) in a wallet or pool and earn rewards for supporting the network. The longer you s…
🤩10❤8😁6🎉4👍3🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @notSadHamsters. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@notSadHamsters edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
3 September 2026
Most recent edit
3 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Crypto Aunt @milfz_crypto · 107,639 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 August 2026
Ecom: The Future. AI, Innovation @ecommerce_AI · 54,417 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 22 August 2026
Tech Paper @TechPaper · 28,616 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
Sin Unicorn 🦄 @sinunicorn · 99,640 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 22 August 2026
Crypto Farmer 🌽 @FarmerCrypto · 44,590 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
Growth Hacker @gr0wth_hack · 69,955 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 22 August 2026
Crypto TV @CryproTV_en · 151,592 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
Crypto Noob @CryptoNoob_en · 74,739 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
Crypto Showcase @crypto_showcase_en · 56,566 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 August 2026
UrgentDrop @UrgentDrop · 55,466 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
Satoshi Tweeted @satoshi_e · 88,889 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 11 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“(not)Sad Hamster” (@notSadHamsters), 67,046 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/notSadHamsters.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.