10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,722–25,773 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 07:07
25,728
-9
14 Aug 2026, 20:44
25,737
-3
13 Aug 2026, 11:35
25,740
-10
12 Aug 2026, 11:36
25,750
-6
11 Aug 2026, 12:56
25,756
-3
10 Aug 2026, 12:31
25,759
-1
9 Aug 2026, 15:11
25,760
-7
8 Aug 2026, 11:01
25,767
+2
7 Aug 2026, 07:41
25,765
no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:31
25,765
first reading
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.8%
avg views ÷ 25,728 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,400
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
31 (31 July 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
229,410
Reactions total
4,187
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,640
Videos
≈172
Links
≈3,520
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 59s
Average length
1m 15s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,187 reactions across 31 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,041
48.7%
🤣
477
11.4%
😁
354
8.45%
❤
317
7.57%
🤮
246
5.88%
👏
233
5.56%
😢
84
2.01%
👀
66
1.58%
💯
52
1.24%
🔥
52
1.24%
🤪
50
1.19%
🤔
45
1.07%
🌭
31
0.74%
🙈
21
0.502%
🤩
14
0.334%
🤬
14
0.334%
👌
12
0.287%
🎉
9
0.215%
⚡
8
0.191%
😐
8
0.191%
17 further kinds
53
1.27%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,187reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
‼️‼️‼️Come era la storia della "Svizzera neutra"?
La banca svizzera Swissquote ha iniziato a informare i cittadini russi della chiusura dei loro conti, scrive "Kommersant".
L'amministratore delegato della banca, Marc Bürki, ha confermato la notizia: "se il cliente si trova in una lista di sanzioni o se i suoi asset finanziari sono strettamente legati alla Russia i conti saranno chiusi"
Non esiste territorio neutra…
❗️❗️❗️Elon Musk dice che entro 10 anni il denaro non servirà piu a nulla.
Secondo me negli USA sta facendo molto caldo...È tutta colpa del cambiamento climatico 😂
‼️‼️‼️Trump: Gli USA controllano lo Stretto di Hormuz, «Penso che lo terremo»
Il biondo esagera sempre con le puttanante 🤣
... va bene tutto, ma adesso non esageriamo 🤣
Qui il posto del Biondo: https://t.me/real_DonaldJTrump/19369
Dati MarineTraffic, no dati Repubblica...
Di seguito traduzione e post originale
Il traffico marittimo aumenta nonostante il rischio
I movimenti delle navi sono aumentati attraverso Hormuz e Bab el-Mandeb l'11 agosto, ma il quadro di rischio sottostante rimane elevato. Hormuz ha registrato 14 attraversamenti, in aumento del 16,7% rispetto al giorno precedente, inclusi 12 vascelli che entravano nel Golfo del Medio …
‼️‼️‼️Dati Kepler, no dati Repubblica 😂. Pertanto c'è qualcuno che mente...
Di seguito traduzione e post originale:
Il traffico negli stretti aumenta, i rischi persistono.
Il traffico marittimo è aumentato sia attraverso lo Stretto di Hormuz che Bab el-Mandeb l'11 agosto, ma i volumi più elevati non si sono tradotti in normalizzazione. Le traversate di Hormuz sono salite a 14, con 11 che utilizzano lo Schema Unila…
‼️‼️‼️Mi son detto: ma veramente hanno detto questo? Sarebbe l'ennesima conferma.
E' da giorni che sui social gira una frase che arriva dall'Iran:
"L’Iran continuerà la sua guerra con gli USA per oltre 2 anni, fino alla fine del mandato di Trump nel 2029."
Ho cercato riscontri, e ho trovato interviste e affermazioni in tal senso.
E sapete cosa ho scoperto?
Che effettivamente, diversi esponenti iraniani hanno pro…
‼️‼️‼️Jason Zweig e stato autore tra l'altro del saggio The Intelligent Investor insieme a Benjamin Graham.
Lui diceva:
«Ci sono tre modi per guadagnarsi da vivere:
Menti alle persone che vogliono che si menta loro, e diventerai ricco.
Di' la verità a coloro che vogliono la verità, e ti guadagnerai da vivere.
Di' la verità a coloro che vogliono che si menta loro, e finirai in bancarotta.»
‼️‼️‼️RECORD DI PRODUZIONE ED ESPORTAZIONE DI PETROLIO A GIUGNO PER GLI EMIRATI ARABI NONOSTANTE LO STRETTO DI HORMUZ SIA CHIUSO? 🤣
Come vi ripeto da diversi mesi, con questa guerra nello stretto di Hormuz, si sta verificando il più alto livello di manipolazione dell'informazione dai tempi del Covid.
Nel periodo 2020/2022 la manipolazione dell'informazione era più facile da individuare visto l'attacco diretto alle …
E' assolutamente falso pensare che in assenza di un coordinamento statale non possa esistere alcuna forma di associazionismo che si occupi di previdenza e assistenza.
Lettura: https://istitutoliberale.it/la-lunga-esperienza-del-welfare-privato-e-volontario-in-italia/
‼️‼️‼️Bitcoin: I 3 Grandi Rischi che Nessuno Vi Racconta.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3P5Tbsxgu8
👍66❤11👌4🔥3💔1🤓1😍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @carrinof. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 979,824 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Francesco Carrino Official” (@carrinof), 25,728 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/carrinof.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.