Channel
@Feirahi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,024subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001092324726 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Feirahi |
| Description | 📚 (بازنشر) آثار و اندیشه ها 📚 ارتباط با ادمین: @DavoodFeirahi @Rezataran |
| Created | 21 January 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Feirahi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 8,024 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:11 | 8,028 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 8,031 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:30 | 8,031 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 8,033 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 11 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🟥 مجموعه سخنرانی و گفتارهای داود فیرحی در رابطه با #امام_حسین (علیه السلام) و روز #عاشورا 🔻 عاشوار و فرهنگ مقاومت 🔻 فساد سیستماتیک و افشاگری امام (ع) 🔻 عاشورا و مسأله بیعت 🔻 بیعت نکردن با یزید 🔻 عاشورا و بحران خلافت 🔻 آستانه سرنوشت 🔻 بازگشت به بنیانگذار 🔻 سنت و خلافت 🔻 عاشورا و بحران سنت 🔻 مفهوم فساد و اصلاح در نهضت عاشورا 🔻 هدف اصلاح در نهضت عاشورا 🔻 عاشورا و اصلاح دین 🔻 عاشورا و انسان امروز 🔻 جامعه ش…
📚رندی و قلندری و استادی ✏️مهدی فدایی مهربانی ♦️شاید بتوان گفت هر پدیدهای از دور یا از نگاه بیرونی همه چیزش ایدهآل به نظر میرسد. یعنی از بیرون ما همواره نظم و هارمونی خدشهناپذیری را شاهدیم که بیشتر تصویر خیالی ماست، گویی از دور همه چیز در سر جای خودش قرار گرفته است، اما وقتی وارد آن میشویم، تازه چیزها تصویر واقعی خود را به ما مینمایانند. تازه میفهمیم آنچه فکر میکردیم با واقعیت متفاوت است. من معتقدم این حتی د…
🔻نقد داود فیرحی بر کتاب «انقلاب اسلامی و ریشه های آن» نوشته محمد تقی مصباح یزدی 🔹این کتاب با روش تاریخ نگاری قدسی شرایط امروز را تعلیق میکند. 🔹در کتاب آمده: «بهرهمندی انقلاب ما از امدادهای غیبی با محاسبات علمی و تجربی محاسبه نمیشود» و با این جمله تمام تحلیلهای علمی را کنار میگذارد. 🔹نویسنده در جای دیگر می نویسد: «امدادهای غیبی بر کسانی که مومنانه و مخلصانه در خدمت انقلاب باشند، نازل میشود و آنها شکستناپذ…
✅️ صوت برنامه «فیرحی و تجدد» 🔹 با حضور دکتر جهانگیر معینی علمداری و دکتر عبدالمجید مبلغی 🍃 دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران، اول آذرماه ۱۴۰۴ @Basij_lp @feirahi
🔹سخنرانی قدیمی با عنوان "درس هایی از عاشورا" @feirahi
🍁پنجمین سالگرد رحلت استاد @feirahi
🔹روزنامه ایران، ویژه نامه پنجمین سالگرد فقدان استاد فیرحی، ۲۱ آبان ماه ۱۴۰۴ @feirahi
🔹روزنامه ایران، ویژه نامه پنجمین سالگرد فقدان استاد فیرحی، ۲۱ آبان ماه ۱۴۰۴ @feirahi
برنامه لغو شد.
✅️ «فیرحی و تجدد» نقد و بررسی اندیشه دکتر داوود فیرحی با حضور: _دکتر جهانگیر معینی علمداری «هیئت علمی دانشگاه تهران» _دکتر رضا تاران «پژوهشگر فقه و سیاست» _دکتر عبدالمجید مبلغی «هیئت علمی پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی » زمان: شنبه ۱۷ آبان ماه ۱۴۰۴ | ساعت ۱۴:۳۰ مکان: دانشگاه تهران، دانشکده حقوق و علومسیاسی، سالن دکتر عنایت @politics_law
🍁معرفی کتاب عاشورا؛ فساد و اصلاح ✅ عاشورا؛ فساد و اصلاح شامل نُه سخنرانی دکتر داود فیرحی در سالهای ۱۳۸۶ تا ۱۳۹۹ است. وی بازهای ۲۴ ساله از تاریخ صدر اسلام را برمیگزیند که از سال ۴۱ هجری ــ سال شهادت امام علی (ع) ــ آغاز شده و تا سال ۶۴ هجری ــ سالی که قدرت از آل معاویه به بنیمروان منتقل میشود ــ ادامه مییابد. ✅ مرحوم فیرحی در این کتاب، با ترسیم جغرافیای سیاسی مرکز خلافت اسلامی یعنی مکه، مدینه، کوفه و شام، ضمن …
🔻نتایج نهایی سومین دورهی دوسالانهی «کتاب عاشورا» 🍁کتاب شایستهی تقدیر در رشتهی تحلیل و تبیین عاشورا: «عاشورا؛ فساد و اصلاح»، اثر داود فیرحی از نشر نی. @feirahi @ashoorabook
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Feirahi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 138,805 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“داود فیرحی” (@Feirahi), 8,024 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Feirahi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.