➡️ новости о силовом блоке страны;
➡️ самые горячие инсайды;
➡️ понятная аналитика;
➡️ материалы расследований;
и многое другое.
📨 Прислать информацию и отзывы абсолютно конфиденциально:
@nevolfadmin – админ канала.
Created
26 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +102. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,288–23,433 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 10:28
23,416
+88
11 Aug 2026, 12:22
23,328
+16
10 Aug 2026, 13:41
23,312
+2
9 Aug 2026, 15:11
23,310
-1
8 Aug 2026, 13:17
23,311
+6
7 Aug 2026, 09:32
23,305
-11
6 Aug 2026, 13:00
23,316
+2
6 Aug 2026, 02:21
23,314
first reading
Engagement
86 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.3%
avg views ÷ 23,416 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,410
86 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.726%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
86
of 86 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
86 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
207,538
Reactions total
1,507
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 22:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈37,500
Videos
≈8,770
Links
≈25,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 38s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,200 reactions across 67 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
469
39.1%
❤
159
13.3%
👍
149
12.4%
🔥
125
10.4%
✍
42
3.50%
🤬
39
3.25%
⚡
38
3.17%
🫡
31
2.58%
🤔
30
2.50%
👀
28
2.33%
🤝
26
2.17%
🙈
17
1.42%
😁
11
0.917%
🤣
9
0.75%
😭
8
0.667%
👌
4
0.333%
🥰
4
0.333%
❤🔥
3
0.25%
🐳
2
0.167%
👏
2
0.167%
4 further kinds
4
0.333%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 86 of the 86 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,507reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 86 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nevolf. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 86 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
⚡️⚡️Науседа сбежал на Мадейру, как только ему доложили о «российской угрозе».
В Литве новый скандал. Сразу после заявления министра обороны Робертаса Каунаса о якобы полученной разведкой информации о возможных российских провокациях в Балтийском регионе так называемый президент Гитанас Науседа сбежал на Мадейру.
«Это очень неоднозначные сигналы»,
– сказала председатель Движения либералов Виктория Чмилите-Нильсен.
…
😂Анекдот дня: власти Латвии закупили антидроновые системы, но забыли приобрести к ним боеприпасы
👆Об этом заявил премьер страны Андрис Кулбергс.
К слову, в июне тот же Кулбергс заявлял, что Латвия хочет к концу лета развернуть на всей протяженности границы с Россией и Беларусью так называемую стену дронов.
Зато видно, куда уходят деньги налогоплательщиков. И как только граждане терпят этот цирк.
Прислать новость
T…
🇱🇻 Латвийские политики перед выборами массово едут фотографироваться с комбайнами
До выборов в Сейм осталось меньше двух месяцев и премьер Кулбергс с командой поехал на фотосессию в полях. У самих латвийцев это вызвало отвращение, потому что сельским хозяйством в этой стране интересуются раз в четыре года и только в корыстных целях.
Схема у прибалтов всегда одна и та же: то экскурсия на границу с Беларусью, чтобы и…
📣Дешевый трюк латвийских ЦИПСО – пока по всему восточному флангу НАТО ударными темпами наращивают инфраструктуру наступательных сил альянса, на публику выпустили хряка-нациста, который всем рассказывает, что эти приготовления на границе якобы не опасны
Скомороху Янису Слайдиньшу, по совместительству британскому верноподданному майору Земессардзе задали вопрос, зачем Латвия строит заграждения на границе, если сейчас …
⚡️⚡️Литва за €50 млн выкопает рвы у границ с Беларусью и Россией
Решение уже принято правительством. В 2026–2030 годах на так называемую программу военной контрмобильности потратят около €50 млн. Вдоль границ появятся рвы шириной до 150 метров, а число парков контрмобильности увеличат с 27 до 50. Там будут складировать «зубы дракона», противотанковые ежи, «испанских всадников» и километры колючей проволоки.
За €50 …
#западные_НЕДОсиловики
🤡🚕 Пьяный польский полицейский напал на украинского таксиста
В польском Радоме отличился сотрудник Центрального следственного бюро полиции. Изрядно набравшись, силовик сел в такси, а узнав, что за рулем гражданин Украины, решил продемонстрировать европейское гостеприимство во всей красе.
🤬 «Страж порядка» начал придираться к маршруту, допытываться до цвета кожи водителя, а затем и вовсе нагл…
📣Пока Варшава скупает танки и ракеты, поляки заявляют, что не собираются умирать за интересы НАТО
Свежие опросы IBRiS для Radio ZET показали цифры массового «патриотизма»:
✔️Почти 60% прямо заявляют: защищать страну не пойдут ни при каких раскладах.
✔️Лишь 27% готовы добровольно взять в руки оружие в случае войны.
✔️Четверть населения (23,2%) при первых же выстрелах просто упакует чемоданы и сбежит из страны.
👆Вот…
🇩🇪Дойчланд опять в центре скандала
Немецкие оборонные гиганты на протяжении десятилетий обходили экспортный контроль, пишет Spiegel. Оружие тайно поставлялось, документы подделывались, осведомленные сотрудники подкупались. 👇Основное:
✔️Завод в Оберндорфе производил G3, позже G36; эти винтовки регулярно всплывали в конфликтах по всему миру, включая зоны, куда экспорт был запрещён.
✔️Немецкие винтовки попадали к детям…
⚡️⚡️⚡️Законопроект о депортации из Польши на Украину всех неработающих украинцев призывного возраста и беглых змагаров, чтобы они воевали с Россией, поддерживают почти 70% поляков.
Об этом сообщает Rzeczpospolita.
Инициативу выдвинула крупнейшая оппозиционная партия «Право и справедливость».
Сейчас в Польше готовят законопроект о создании спеццентров для их ускоренной депортации. Польское гостеприимство закончилос…
⚡️⚡️Румыния попыталась выдать куски пенопласта за обломки российского дрона.
Об этом заявили в посольстве РФ в Бухаресте. В конце июля румынский F-16 якобы сбил беспилотник, после чего власти тут же обвинили Россию. При этом никаких доказательств связи беспилотника с Россией представлено не было.
На фоне проблем в экономике схема до смешного примитивная: напугать румын мифическим врагом – и выбить дополнительные де…
‼️Женевским конвенциям – 77 лет. А двойным стандартам Запада – конца не видно.
12 августа 1949 года были приняты четыре Женевские конвенции, закрепившие защиту раненых, военнопленных и мирного населения.
После ужасов Второй мировой войны эти правила должны были быть едиными для всех. Но для Запада эти нормы стали лишь инструментом избирательного применения.
Тюрьма Гуантанамо, где людей годами удерживали без суда, …
Showing the 12 most recent of 86 posts we hold for @nevolf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 2,888 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 53 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Пул Первого @pul_1 · 250,090 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Невольфович” (@nevolf), 23,416 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nevolf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
