Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 159 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 97 days, net -303. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,105–16,503 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 02:20
16,151
-5
9 Nov 2026, 09:59
16,156
-11
8 Nov 2026, 02:29
16,167
-4
7 Nov 2026, 02:00
16,171
-4
6 Nov 2026, 00:01
16,175
+4
4 Nov 2026, 21:58
16,171
-3
2 Nov 2026, 21:08
16,174
-5
1 Nov 2026, 21:05
16,179
-4
31 Oct 2026, 20:55
16,183
+1
31 Oct 2026, 00:28
16,182
-1
30 Oct 2026, 02:29
16,183
-5
29 Oct 2026, 04:50
16,188
-2
27 Oct 2026, 01:38
16,190
-3
25 Oct 2026, 22:09
16,193
+1
24 Oct 2026, 23:49
16,192
+2
24 Oct 2026, 02:27
16,190
-4
23 Oct 2026, 04:48
16,194
-7
22 Oct 2026, 03:16
16,201
-5
21 Oct 2026, 00:10
16,206
-10
20 Oct 2026, 01:37
16,216
first reading
Engagement
233 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.2%
avg views ÷ 16,151 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,110
64 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
64
of 233 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
233 (5 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
198,930
Reactions total
4,737
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 06:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈8,720
Videos
≈4,300
Links
≈6,820
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 27m
Average length
1m 01s
Measured directly from 85 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
19,518 reactions across 233 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
3,484
17.9%
💯
3,419
17.5%
custom 5382219601054544127
2,824
14.5%
🤣
2,440
12.5%
custom 6055364280553837262
1,914
9.81%
👍
1,698
8.70%
custom 5201770570202499662
819
4.20%
❤
645
3.30%
🔥
622
3.19%
🤮
334
1.71%
🤬
314
1.61%
😱
239
1.22%
👏
150
0.769%
custom 5449408995691341691
145
0.743%
🤔
96
0.492%
🎉
81
0.415%
🫡
79
0.405%
👎
77
0.395%
custom 5269721741713745479
47
0.241%
🤯
45
0.231%
3 further kinds
46
0.236%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 233 of the 233 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,518 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 233 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
27
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 233 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @guBAZA. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 233 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 18 of 64 posts held from the last 30 days (28.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Шел 2026 год: протесты нынче тухленькие какие-то и без энтузиазма 😂
P.s. ставку снизили до 5 евро за акцию — массовка резко пропала
ПРИСЛАТЬ ИНФОРМАЦИЮ🤝 ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ НА КАНАЛ ✅
❗️19 ноября в честь выхода GTA 6 ГУ"База"* дает экстремистам выходной
Все обыска и задержания переносятся на следующее утро, чтобы дать экстремистам поиграть. Потому что некоторые освободятся как раз к выходу следующей части 😅
*гуманитарное управление Министерства добрых дел
❗️Экстремизм и терроризм - общая проблема
Польские силовики действуют верно, пресекая все формы оправдания и пропаганды терроризма. Любая писанина в интернете такого рода должна жесточайшим образом наказываться.
Нормальные люди оставляют комментарии с соболезнованиями или словами поддержки патрульным, врачам.
❗️Лондон - столица поножовщины, хвастает снижением нападений на улицах аж в 2 раза
В 2026 году "всего лишь" 260 молодых людей в возрасте до 25 лет были зарезаны прямо на на улицах. И этот город занимает ведущие места в европейско-лгбтшных рейтингах "безопасности"
Зато Минск у них - крайне опасный, ага.
*на фото женщина с акции протеста после ножевого убийства 15-летней школьницы в 2023 году
❗️Дедок предлагает стучать в спецслужбы стран пребывания на змагаров, отказывающихся поклоняться Светлане Тихановской
Вот тебе и принципы "анархистов" и "борцов с рыжымам". Вся их "солидарность" связана только с укрытием преступлений по совращению несовершеннолетних.
⚡️Осторожно, фейк!
Поддельный Telegram-канал «КГБ» распространяет дезу, что на границе с Украиной предпринята попытка проникновения на территорию Беларуси вооруженной группы. При этом «принадлежность группы к каким-либо вооружённым формированиям, её численность и цели не установлены».
❗️Это - вброс! Посев произошел через фейковый канал, ранее неоднократно замеченный в продвижении дезинформации и информационно-психо…
❗️Дорогие ветераны, уважаемые коллеги!
Сердечно поздравляю вас с Днем чествования ветеранов органов внутренних дел и внутренних войск МВД!
Этот праздник - дань глубокого уважения и признательности людям, которые посвятили жизнь защите правопорядка, обеспечению безопасности граждан и созидательному труду на нашей земле. Ваш профессиональный путь - эталон верности Присяге, мужества и безупречного служения Отечеству.
…
🇧🇾✨Заместитель Генерального прокурора Республики Беларусь Геннадий Дыско представил коллективу прокуратуры Брестской области нового заместителя областного прокурора – на указанную должность приказом Генерального прокурора Республики Беларусь назначен Александр Карлюк.
🇧🇾🇵🇱 Заместитель Министра иностранных дел Игорь Секрета выразил соболезнования в связи с терактом в Кракове
9 ноября 2026 г. заместитель Министра иностранных дел Беларуси Игорь Секрета посетил Посольство Польши в Беларуси и оставил запись в книге соболезнований в связи с гибелью людей в результате теракта в Кракове.
#Секрета #Польша
Showing the 12 most recent of 233 posts we hold for @guBAZA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 33 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@guBAZA named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@gubazabot named in 10 posts, 9 August 2026 – 8 November 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Внутренние войска МВД 🇧🇾 @vvmvdrb · 19,603 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 October 2026
Пул Первого @pul_1 · 271,963 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Невольфович @nevolf · 28,375 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
Гайдукевич Олег @gajdukevichh · 42,989 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026
Главный. Тур @glav_tur · 18,816 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 September 2026
МВД Беларуси @pressmvd · 72,643 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 August 2026
Следственный комитет Беларуси @skgovby · 30,898 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 7 September 2026
Милиция Беларуси. Мы – НА СТРАЖЕ @NA_STRAGE · 36,703 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
ONT NEWS @ontnews · 30,460 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
Пограничный комитет Беларуси @gpkgovby · 19,466 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 3 October 2026
Минская правда|MLYN.by @mlynby · 17,520 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 24 September 2026
NEWS.BY @newsby_btrc · 24,058 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 September 2026
ТРЕШОВЫЙ МИНСК 18+ @treshoviyminsk · 19,244 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 2 October 2026
ЧП Беларусь 🚨 Будь в курсе @cpbelarus · 51,622 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
BELTA @belta_telegramm · 82,154 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
МЧС Беларуси @mchs112by · 45,637 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026
Onliner @onlinerby · 148,891 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Официальный Минздрав - новости здравоохранения и фармацевтики Республики Беларусь @minzdravbelarus · 32,501 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 5 September 2026
Smartpress.by / Новости @smartpress · 30,408 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
ОХРАНА.BY @ohranaby · 27,020 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 September 2026
Цифровая грамотность @cifgram · 25,723 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 September 2026
ЖС Premium @zheltye_slivy_Belarus · 38,034 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 31 August 2026
Realt @realtbyofficial · 34,054 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
Милиция Минска @police_minsk · 22,793 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Книга ГУ«БАЗА»” (@guBAZA), 16,151 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/guBAZA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
