Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЦИК Беларуси

Channel

ЦИК Беларуси

@cikbelarus

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

6,170subscribers

-75 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001546668870
TypeChannel
Username@cikbelarus
Created21 January 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cikbelarus

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,1706,2456,207.56 August 2026 — 6,245 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,245 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,242 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,238 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,236 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,231 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,227 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,220 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,209 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,205 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,200 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,192 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,183 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,181 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,175 subscribers25 September 2026 — 6,170 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
16 measurements spanning 50 days, net -75. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,159–6,256 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 20:176,170-5
17 Sept 2026, 12:186,175-6
13 Sept 2026, 12:556,181-2
9 Sept 2026, 19:366,183-9
4 Sept 2026, 06:566,192-8
1 Sept 2026, 06:186,200-5
28 Aug 2026, 19:426,205-4
25 Aug 2026, 09:126,209-11
22 Aug 2026, 12:236,220-7
19 Aug 2026, 11:166,227-4
16 Aug 2026, 02:226,231-5
12 Aug 2026, 16:336,236-2
10 Aug 2026, 01:056,238-4
7 Aug 2026, 01:366,242-3
6 Aug 2026, 10:306,245no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:426,245first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

149 reactions across 21 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍9865.8%
❤4429.5%
🔥42.68%
❤‍🔥10.671%
🏆10.671%
🤨10.671%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 149 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC912 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🏁 Подводим итоги: 5 столпов белорусского избирательного права 📜 Завершилась специальная серия публикаций, посвященная ключевым принципам избирательной системы Республики Беларусь, зафиксированным в статье 38 Конституции: «Граждане Республики Беларусь имеют право свободно избирать и быть избранными в государственные органы на основе всеобщего, равного, прямого или косвенного избирательного права при тайном голосован…

❤11👍4🔥4❤‍🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC465 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Супруги вошли в одну кабину, но каждый заполняет свой бюллетень самостоятельно. Допускается ли это?

  1. Да, если они не показывают бюллетени друг другу5%
  2. Нет, при заполнении бюллетеня в кабине присутствует только голосующий89%
  3. Да, с разрешения председателя комиссии6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍3❤1

6 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC410 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Избиратель не может сам заполнить бюллетень. Кого он вправе пригласить для помощи?

  1. Другое лицо по своему усмотрению57%
  2. Члена комиссии29%
  3. Наблюдателя, аккредитованного на участке14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍3❤1

6 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC452 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Председатель комиссии просит показать бюллетень для проверки, что знак стоит в одном квадрате. Допустима ли такая проверка?

  1. Да, если председатель не спрашивает, за кого подан голос2%
  2. Нет, такая проверка создает контроль за волеизъявлением97%
  3. Да, если проверка проходит в присутствии наблюдателя2%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍4❤1

6 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC541 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Что из перечисленного строго запрещено на участке для обеспечения тайны голосования?

  1. Использовать собственную ручку для заполнения бюллетеня1%
  2. Делать фото или видео заполненного бюллетеня97%
  3. Обращаться к членам комиссии за разъяснением порядка голосования2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍4❤1

6 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC623 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Какое действие наблюдателя на участке является нарушением принципа тайны голосования?

  1. Наблюдение за выдачей бюллетеней членам комиссии0%
  2. Нахождение у кабины и попытка заглянуть в бюллетень избирателя во время голосования97%
  3. Нахождение в помещении для голосования во время подсчета голосов3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍4❤1

6 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC786 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Избиратель случайно поставил в бюллетене знак не в том квадрате. Чтобы сохранить тайну своего выбора, может ли он вынести испорченный бюллетень с участка или порвать его?

  1. Да, это его личный бюллетень, он имеет право забрать его с собой1%
  2. Да, но только порвав его на мелкие части прямо у ящика0%
  3. Нет, вынос бюллетеня за пределы помещения запрещен. Нужно обратиться к комиссии за новым99%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍4❤1

6 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC900 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Избиратель заявляет, что не скрывает свой выбор, и заполняет бюллетень у стола выдачи. Допустимо ли это?

  1. Да, если рядом нет других избирателей5%
  2. Нет, если против этого возражает наблюдатель3%
  3. Нет. Бюллетень должен заполняться в кабине или комнате для тайного голосования92%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍4❤1

6 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC585 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

👥Принцип №5: ТАЙНОЕ голосование Мой выбор – мой секрет. Как обеспечивается тайна голосования? 🔝Принцип тайны голосования полностью защищает избирателя от любого давления, контроля или вмешательства в его волеизъявление. Для реализации этого права Избирательный кодекс Республики Беларусь устанавливает строгие правила: 1️⃣ Бюллетень заполняется исключительно в специальной кабине (или комнате) для тайного голосования…

👍8❤1

5 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC473 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Каким образом закон защищает свободу выбора граждан непосредственно в день голосования?

  1. Запретом на проведение любой агитации на участках для голосования в день выборов85%
  2. Обязательным нахождением на участке для голосования сотрудника милиции8%
  3. Запретом на аккредитацию наблюдателей избирательными комиссиями в день выборов7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍5❤2

5 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC436 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Избиратель решил не посещать предвыборные пикеты и встречи с кандидатами, предпочитая провести время с семьей. Нарушает ли это закон?

  1. Нет, но он должен предупредить об этом избирательную комиссию2%
  2. Нет, гражданин абсолютно свободен в решении, посещать ли агитационные мероприятия97%
  3. Да, посещение агитационных мероприятий по месту жительства является обязательным2%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍5❤2

5 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC443 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Вправе ли избиратель не подписывать подписной лист, если он не хочет поддерживать выдвижение кандидата?

  1. Нет, если с этой просьбой к нему обратилось лично лицо, выдвигаемое кандидатом2%
  2. Да, но только при наличии уважительных причин для отказа2%
  3. Да, ставить подпись или отказаться – это исключительно свободный и добровольный выбор гражданина96%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍5❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @cikbelarus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 18 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz116 voters

Председатель комиссии просит показать бюллетень для проверки, что знак стоит в одном квадрате. Допустима ли такая проверка?

  1. Да, если председатель не спрашивает, за кого подан голос2%
  2. Нет, такая проверка создает контроль за волеизъявлением97%
  3. Да, если проверка проходит в присутствии наблюдателя2%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz119 voters

Какое действие наблюдателя на участке является нарушением принципа тайны голосования?

  1. Наблюдение за выдачей бюллетеней членам комиссии0%
  2. Нахождение у кабины и попытка заглянуть в бюллетень избирателя во время голосования97%
  3. Нахождение в помещении для голосования во время подсчета голосов3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz115 voters

Супруги вошли в одну кабину, но каждый заполняет свой бюллетень самостоятельно. Допускается ли это?

  1. Да, если они не показывают бюллетени друг другу5%
  2. Нет, при заполнении бюллетеня в кабине присутствует только голосующий89%
  3. Да, с разрешения председателя комиссии6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz116 voters

Избиратель не может сам заполнить бюллетень. Кого он вправе пригласить для помощи?

  1. Другое лицо по своему усмотрению57%
  2. Члена комиссии29%
  3. Наблюдателя, аккредитованного на участке14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz118 voters

Что из перечисленного строго запрещено на участке для обеспечения тайны голосования?

  1. Использовать собственную ручку для заполнения бюллетеня1%
  2. Делать фото или видео заполненного бюллетеня97%
  3. Обращаться к членам комиссии за разъяснением порядка голосования2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz124 voters

Избиратель случайно поставил в бюллетене знак не в том квадрате. Чтобы сохранить тайну своего выбора, может ли он вынести испорченный бюллетень с участка или порвать его?

  1. Да, это его личный бюллетень, он имеет право забрать его с собой1%
  2. Да, но только порвав его на мелкие части прямо у ящика0%
  3. Нет, вынос бюллетеня за пределы помещения запрещен. Нужно обратиться к комиссии за новым99%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Минск-Новости
@minsknews_by · 22,858
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
Министерство образования Беларуси
@MinobrofBelarus · 32,894
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 4 September 2026
Гайдукевич Олег
@gajdukevichh · 43,422
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026
Официальный Минздрав - новости здравоохранения и фармацевтики Республики Беларусь
@minzdravbelarus · 32,530
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 5 September 2026
NEWS.BY
@newsby_btrc · 23,970
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 September 2026
Следственный комитет Беларуси
@skgovby · 30,429
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 7 September 2026
Главный. Тур
@glav_tur · 21,065
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 September 2026
Милиция Минска
@police_minsk · 22,566
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 September 2026
Moladz.by
@moladz_by_official · 21,644
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 23 September 2026
БРСМ: live
@brsm_official · 20,940
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 26 September 2026
Министерство труда и социальной защиты Республики Беларусь
@MintrudSocBelarus · 25,178
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
BELAVIA - Belarusian Airlines
@belavia_official · 58,087
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 September 2026
ONT NEWS
@ontnews · 31,284
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
МАРТ
@mart_gov_by · 23,229
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
МОЗЫРЬ 🇧🇾
@gorodmozyr · 20,844
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 26 September 2026
Беларусбанк: канал
@belarusbank_channel · 36,883
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
ОХРАНА.BY
@ohranaby · 26,631
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 September 2026
Цифровая грамотность
@cifgram · 22,750
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 September 2026
Милиция Беларуси. Мы – НА СТРАЖЕ
@NA_STRAGE · 36,083
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
Министерство обороны Республики Беларусь
@modmilby · 36,246
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
УГАИ ГУВД Мингорисполкома
@gaiminsk · 38,332
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
BELTA
@belta_telegramm · 82,023
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
Минская правда|MLYN.by
@mlynby · 20,517
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 24 September 2026
Невольфович
@nevolf · 28,787
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q2576708 on Wikidata, read 27 September 2026
LabelCentral Election Commission of Belarus
Descriptiongovernment body
Official sitehttp://rec.gov.by

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

2024 Belarusian parliamentary election (en.wikipedia.org)
“…March 2024.{{Cite web |date=2024-02-24 |title=ЦИК Беларуси |url=https://t.me/cikbelarus/1848 |access-date=2024-02-26 |website= |via=[[Telegram (software)|Telegram]]…”
read 13 September 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЦИК Беларуси” (@cikbelarus), 6,170 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cikbelarus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.