Об авторе:
Депутат Палаты представителей Национального собрания Республики Беларусь, член Постоянной комиссии по международным делам
Член Президиума Высшего Политсовета Белорусской партии "Белая Русь"
Created
11 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (4 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 149 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
28 measurements spanning 97 days, net +635. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,015–10,185 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 09:07
9,902
-10
7 Nov 2026, 07:30
9,912
-5
3 Nov 2026, 21:19
9,917
-14
1 Nov 2026, 07:45
9,931
-14
29 Oct 2026, 07:59
9,945
-9
26 Oct 2026, 02:01
9,954
-2
22 Oct 2026, 19:47
9,956
-12
19 Oct 2026, 16:06
9,968
-3
16 Oct 2026, 22:15
9,971
-11
13 Oct 2026, 23:09
9,982
-14
8 Oct 2026, 20:17
9,996
-13
4 Oct 2026, 12:41
10,009
-22
26 Sept 2026, 00:37
10,031
-19
19 Sept 2026, 06:41
10,050
+2
16 Sept 2026, 20:18
10,048
+837
13 Sept 2026, 04:20
9,211
+61
8 Sept 2026, 22:36
9,150
-18
3 Sept 2026, 09:18
9,168
-10
31 Aug 2026, 08:43
9,178
-5
28 Aug 2026, 13:03
9,183
first reading
Engagement
165 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.9%
avg views ÷ 9,902 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,470
63 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
63
of 165 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
165 (30 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
92,701
Reactions total
3,008
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 23:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,790
Videos
≈1,110
Links
≈4,430
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
54m 08s
Average length
2m 05s
Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,265 reactions across 159 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
3,634
50.0%
💯
1,554
21.4%
❤
923
12.7%
🔥
470
6.47%
🤔
116
1.60%
😁
112
1.54%
👏
105
1.45%
🙏
82
1.13%
🤡
47
0.647%
❤🔥
31
0.427%
🤝
29
0.399%
🤯
26
0.358%
😡
17
0.234%
🎉
14
0.193%
🕊
13
0.179%
😢
12
0.165%
🤬
12
0.165%
🤣
10
0.138%
💩
7
0.096%
👎
6
0.083%
17 further kinds
45
0.619%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 164 of the 165 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,516 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 165 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 21 of 63 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🎙Спикер в ток-шоу «Будни» — депутат Александр Шпаковский
Поскольку в эфире сегодня выступал член Постоянной комиссии по международным делам, большинство тем было связаны с происходящими в мире событиями.
⏺Саммит ОДКБ в Москве: какова главная цель этой Организации по мнению белорусского лидера?
⏺Переговоры в Абу-Даби: каковы возможные сценарии развития событий?
⏺Не наводить мосты, а выстраивать границы: Премьер Мо…
🔥Александр Шпаковский напомнил, как беглые грантоеды и их хозяева рассчитывали обрушить белорусскую экономику санкциями, но просчитались. Вместо краха - рост вопреки ожиданиям злопыхателей.
А что касается наших недругов, отмечу, что в 2022 году, когда в полной мере заработали санкции против Республики Беларусь, они ведь всё очень педантично посчитали: какие отрасли приносят нам наибольшую прибыль. Всё это попало под…
Обращу внимание, что Кишинев используется в качестве перевалочной базы для украинских террористов, что несовместимо с нейтральным статусом Республики Молдова, который формально закреплён в Конституции этой страны.
Стремление киевского режима втянуть Молдову в войну общеизвестно. Для европейского "глубинного государства" молдавский народ также является разменной монетой и не представляет никакой ценности.
Совершение…
🎬Александр Шпаковский объяснил, почему к словам Батьки прислушиваются не только союзники по ОДКБ, но и даже недруги, внимательно следящие за каждым его заявлением:
Опрометчиво не прислушиваться к словам Александра Григорьевича. Я просто по опыту общения с зарубежными коллегами знаю, что к Лукашенко в целом относятся весьма внимательно.
К его заявлениям прислушиваются в политических кругах абсолютно разных стран: и …
Российская сторона подчёркнуто проводит Совет коллективной безопасности ОДКБ на фоне переговоров в Абу-Даби.
В данном контексте также следует рассматривать теплую и доверительную встречу ближайших союзников Александра Лукашенко и Владимира Путина, которые сейчас выстраивают выгодную для Беларуси и России конфигурацию региональной и глобальной безопасности.
Замечание Лаврова в адрес европейцев "пусть посидят в гост…
Моисей водил народ Израиля по пустыне 40 лет и таки вывел на Землю Обетованную, а Биби Нетаньяху завел Трампа в политический тупик всего за несколько месяцев.
https://t.me/ontnews/223025
Позорище.
Глава МИД Молдовы Попшой объявил о намерении "ввести санкции" против России и Беларуси, чтобы "продемонстрировать Брюсселю свое соответствие европейским ценностям".
На протяжении многих лет Минск терпеливо выстраивал экономическое взаимодействие с Кишиневом, включая создание совместных производств на территории Молдовы.
На пике в 2014 году двусторонний товарооборот превышал $400 млн., включая молдавский …
Депутат Сергей Рачков — спикер в утреннем эфире на 1️⃣
Председатель Постоянной комиссии по международным делам выступил на республиканском ТВ и высказался о том, почему итоги выборов в Конгресс США именно такие и как они повлияют на внутриполитическую ситуацию в стране в целом, а также на взаимоотношения Соединенных Штатов и Беларуси.
Смотрите по ссылке.💙️
▪ Лично у меня нет никаких иллюзий что нынешний раунд переговоров в ОАЭ приблизит Россию к миру.
▪ Евросоюз делает ставку на продолжение масштабной финансовой и военно-технической поддержки Украины как минимум до 2030 года - это консенсусное решение европейских политических элит;
▪ В 2027-2028 гг. режим Зеленского получит от стран ЕС и Великобритании десятки миллионов новых БПЛА и крылатых ракет для ударов по Рос…
👍32💯13🤔3🤪1🤷♂1
Showing the 12 most recent of 165 posts we hold for @shpakouski. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@shpakouski named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@sbbytoday named in 3 posts, 12 August 2026 – 27 August 2026 · confirmed gone 4 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rian_ru named in 2 posts, 4 November 2026 – 5 November 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Дзермант @dzermant · 25,095 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 September 2026
Гайдукевич Олег @gajdukevichh · 42,989 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026
Главный. Тур @glav_tur · 18,816 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 September 2026
Невольфович @nevolf · 28,375 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
Игорь Коротченко @igor_korotchenko · 19,458 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
ЖС Premium @zheltye_slivy_Belarus · 38,012 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 31 August 2026
NEWS.BY @newsby_btrc · 24,075 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 September 2026
Минск-Новости @minsknews_by · 22,314 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
Минская правда|MLYN.by @mlynby · 17,520 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 24 September 2026
BELTA @belta_telegramm · 82,154 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
Следственный комитет Беларуси @skgovby · 30,932 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 7 September 2026
Министерство обороны Республики Беларусь @modmilby · 37,283 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
Официальный Минздрав - новости здравоохранения и фармацевтики Республики Беларусь @minzdravbelarus · 32,502 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 5 September 2026
МВД Беларуси @pressmvd · 72,643 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 August 2026
Пограничный комитет Беларуси @gpkgovby · 19,464 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 3 October 2026
ONT NEWS @ontnews · 30,460 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
Внутренние войска МВД 🇧🇾 @vvmvdrb · 19,603 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 October 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Шпаковский. По существу.” (@shpakouski), 9,902 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shpakouski.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.