Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Адвокат его превосходительства

Channel

Адвокат его превосходительства

@uzdenskiy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,616subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001745853193
TypeChannel
Username@uzdenskiy
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/uzdenskiy

Growth

6,6126,6406,6266 August 2026 — 6,639 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,639 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,640 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,628 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,612 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,616 subscribers6,6166 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,608–6,644 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 01:466,616+4
12 Aug 2026, 21:546,612-16
9 Aug 2026, 18:126,628-12
6 Aug 2026, 16:236,640+1
6 Aug 2026, 03:196,639no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:336,639first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.1%
avg views ÷ 6,616 subscribers
Avg views / post
998
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held22 (24 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total20,951
Reactions total318
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 45s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

307 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12039.1%
😁5417.6%
🔥3110.1%
👍227.17%
🤣216.84%
🤪144.56%
💯134.23%
🙈72.28%
🤝61.95%
👌51.63%
😱41.30%
🤯30.977%
🫡30.977%
🥴20.651%
10.326%
👀10.326%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 318reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 21 we hold a reading for · 52%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @uzdenskiy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC512 views26 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Раньше выборы снимали на яблоко. Теперь яблоко сняли с выборов. Боюсь, айфонам тоже осталось недолго. Да и сами фрукты я бы пока не покупал от греха.

13😁10👍2🥴1

11 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC525 views18 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

Часто слышим довод о том, что в России адвокаты не нужны, потому что суды не выносят оправдательных приговоров. Во-первых, выносят. Во-вторых, этот дилетантский тезис не учитывает огромного пласта иной помощи, которую адвокат может оказать доверителю. От прекращения излишне вмененных, «задвоенных» составов до сохранения бизнеса и активов при неизбежной посадке. От оставления в статусе свидетеля до своевременного и вы

18

7 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC801 views14 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

Абсолютно реальная история, достойная экранизации 😁

😁104

5 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC984 views7 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

🥊«Я же всё сделал. Работы выполнены, деньги никто не украл. Ну дал откат — и что?» Именно так многие предприниматели рассуждают до первого допроса, обыска или задержания. Но с точки зрения закона откат может быть квалифицирован как коммерческий подкуп по статье 204 УК РФ. Причём уголовная ответственность грозит не только тому, кто получил деньги, но и тому, кто их передал — а иногда даже посреднику, который просто

5👍2

5 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC828 views19 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Начинаем рейтинговый год с очень приятных новостей. В рейтинге WEALTH Navigator Legal 2026 АБ «МУР» отмечено сразу в четырех номинациях. WEALTH Navigator - ежегодный рейтинг юридических фирм, работающих с частным капиталом. В нем оценивают опыт и проекты по защите бизнеса, личных и семейных активов, налоговым, уголовным и другим вопросам. Основные клиенты - состоятельные частные лица, владельцы крупного бизнеса и ч

11👍8

4 Aug 2026, 06:21 UTC836 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Да, был такой случай. 159 ч 4. Конфликт одной группы бывших партнеров против другой. Одна группа вывела из компании деньги, которая считала своими по праву. Как оказалось, дело заказное, но в тот момент мне это было еще не очевидно. Следствие предложило классический выбор: «признавай и давай показания на партнера или СИЗО».Тогда я сказал доверителю, что выбор тяжелый, но если всё именно так, как вы говорите, то я ре

12🔥3

3 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC859 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Им не важно, что фабула выглядит дюже глупо. Есть гендир, заместитель, главбух - вот тебе и группа. Им не важно, что в кризис, в ковид шли дела фигово. В срок не сдал госконтракт - вот тебе и преступный сговор.

🔥5😱42

31 Jul 2026, 07:48 UTC≈1,200 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Приглашаю вас на Юридическую неделю в Казани «Практические проблемы судебного процесса в России»— она посвящена 5-летию Клуба процессуалистов. 📅 24–27 сентября 2026, Казань Благодаря партнёрству с организаторами Казанского международного юридического форума программа получилась по-настоящему сильной. Неделя выстроена как последовательное профессиональное путешествие: от широкого взгляда на профессию на КМЮФ — к прак

7👍41🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 14:36 UTC≈1,110 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

А вот лайки самому Дурову хз как могут быть расценены. Лучше удалите

🤣213

30 Jul 2026, 13:51 UTC≈1,170 views18 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

По информации из Госдумы, в связи с признанием Дурова экстремистом покупка Telegram Premium не будет считаться финансированием экстремизма, поскольку ограничения коснутся именно активов Дурова, а не оплат услуг его продукта. Стало быть, саму Телегу пока экстремистской признавать не собираются. Но, глядя на предыдущий свой пост, я бы эту инфу систематически обновлял.

18

30 Jul 2026, 13:37 UTC≈1,160 views20 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

Оруэлла на них нет. Куда смотрит министерство правды? Срочно заменить.

🤪14🙈4🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @uzdenskiy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 88,231 of 1,480,740entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Адвокат его превосходительства” (@uzdenskiy), 6,616 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uzdenskiy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.