5 measurements spanning 21 days, net +402. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 136–658 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Sept 2026, 14:41
598
+96
28 Aug 2026, 15:23
502
+289
22 Aug 2026, 09:37
213
+17
15 Aug 2026, 12:05
196
no change
14 Aug 2026, 21:02
196
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.36%
avg views ÷ 598 subscribers
Avg views / post
56.0
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
15 (28 July 2026 – 13 August 2026)
Views total
224
Reactions total
16
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 51s
Average length
46s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
73 reactions across 10 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5443044287950399588
13
17.8%
custom 5361687097579166935
8
11.0%
custom 5420315771991497307
8
11.0%
custom 5422354988103901774
8
11.0%
custom 5435957248314579621
5
6.85%
custom 5469741319330996757
5
6.85%
custom 5471921242866981303
5
6.85%
custom 5373141891321699086
4
5.48%
custom 5251233543887015702
3
4.11%
custom 5377509842996972717
3
4.11%
custom 5251460116296782673
2
2.74%
custom 5251586199356722953
2
2.74%
custom 5379839828395318407
2
2.74%
custom 5382014267258062531
2
2.74%
custom 5251529952465015674
1
1.37%
custom 5357080225463149588
1
1.37%
custom 5469770542288478598
1
1.37%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 13 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @arspolitik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
А что если пандус проверит тот, кто действительно им пользуется?
Доступная среда – это не формальность для жителей и не строчка в отчёте. Это возможность человека с ограниченными возможностями свободно выйти из дома, попасть в аптеку, перейти дорогу или воспользоваться общественным транспортом.
К сожалению, сегодня многие элементы городской среды лишь выглядят доступными. На практике ими невозможно пользоваться: сл…
Игры кончились: в России хотят выпустить закон о регулировании видеоигр 🎮
Недавно появилась новость, что в новом созыве Госдумы будут обсуждать законопроект о «регулировании» видеоигр. Среди предложений — вход через «Госуслуги», жесткая маркировка и удаление контента.
Мы уже выступали против необдуманных ограничений в цифровой среде и продолжим делать всё, чтобы законы не создавали проблем для пользователей, россий…
Месяц жизни в электричке – пора это менять
Каждый день тысячи жителей Подмосковья тратят не мало времени на дорогу до работы. Полтора часа в одну сторону, полтора обратно. Три часа в день. За год это больше 700 часов – почти целый месяц, проведённый не с семьёй, а в дороге.
Люди ездят в Москву не потому, что хотят, а потому, что рядом с домом не хватает хорошо оплачиваемой работы.
В нашей 42-й инициативе мы предла…
Почему в одних городах хочется жить, а из других хочется уехать?
Рассказываем про новый проект «Разговор на кухне» — серию открытых дискуссий о городах, регионах и жизни в современной России.
Ведущая проекта — Дарья Кислицына, координатор проекта «Городские решения».
В первом выпуске вместе с культурологом, музыковедом, автором подкаста и книги «Искусство для пацанчиков» Анастасией Четвериковой обсуждаем:
Ссылк…
Причина #6
Сейчас Telegram и YouTube платформы находятся в серой зоне: их можно заблокировать в любой момент, а миллионы пользователей — оставить без связи и контента.
«Новые люди» предлагают ввести специальный правовой статус для глобальных платформ. Сервисы получат понятные правила, а люди — гарантию, что их аккаунты и данные не исчезнут в один день.
Законопроект уже готов. Осталось только его принять.
Если счи…
Жильцы должны иметь возможность сменить управляющую компанию, если она не устраивает их качеством работы
Собственники ежемесячно оплачивают содержание и обслуживание своего дома и вправе рассчитывать на качественную работу управляющей компании. Но на практике часто сталкиваются с неубранными подъездами, неисправными лифтами, неработающим освещением и другими проблемами.
При этом сменить плохую управляющую компанию …
Причина #5
Мы не игнорируем проблему наркотиков среди молодёжи.
Не только «рейды раз в год», а профилактика в школах, работа с родителями, открытый контроль точек продаж.
Когда подростки видят, что тема не замалчивается, а обсуждается нормально — это уже шаг. «Новые Люди» предлагают именно системную работу, а не картинку для отчёта.
P.S мы даже запустили профильный проект с Гуфом для реабилитации и социализации п…
Причина #4
Я выбираю «Новых Людей», потому что мы хотим убрать бюрократию. Одна понятная онлайн-платформа вместо 15 справок и трёх кабинетов.
Статус выплаты, запись к врачу, документы на льготы — всё в одном месте. Для обычного человека это экономия времени и нервов.
И это не «красивая идея», а направление, которое мы системно продвигаем.
Чжан - подписаться 📱
Чжан - подписаться 📱
#НовыеЛюди50
#НовыеЛюдиМосковска…
Причина #3
«Новые Люди» говорят про семьи не лозунгами, а конкретными предложениями. Упростить получение льгот, сделать выплаты понятными и быстрыми, убрать бесконечные справки.
Я знаю семьи, которые месяцами собирали документы на пособия.
Партия предлагает единый цифровой контур, где данные уже есть и не нужно бегать по кабинетам. Для многодетных и пожилых это не «мелочь» — это реальное облегчение жизни.
Чжан - …
❗️Честная конкуренция
Творческие индустрии не должны страдать от вечных запретов и переносов.
С малого возраста я был фанатом Человека Паука, а кому из пацанов не нравятся супер-герои?
А Колобка мне читала мама, когда я не умел говорить.
Давайте устроим реальный батл Человек Паук VS Колобок. Голосуйте (опрос ниже).
Чжан - подписаться 📱
Чжан - подписаться 📱
#НовыеЛюди50
#НовыеЛюдиМосковскаяОбласть
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @arspolitik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
НЕЧАЕВ @nechaev_official · 36,751 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 1 September 2026
Партия «Новые люди» @partynewpeople · 82,823 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
ДАВАНКОВ // Вице-спикер Госдумы @davankov · 217,220 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Горячева ДЕЛО говорит @DeputatGoryacheva · 66,527 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЧЖАН” (@arspolitik), 598 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arspolitik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
