International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 2,055 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 97 days, net -354. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,169–32,629 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 21:21
32,222
-3
9 Nov 2026, 22:40
32,225
-9
8 Nov 2026, 13:00
32,234
-8
6 Nov 2026, 08:40
32,242
+4
5 Nov 2026, 07:16
32,238
+2
4 Nov 2026, 04:30
32,236
-7
3 Nov 2026, 06:28
32,243
-5
2 Nov 2026, 04:49
32,248
+2
31 Oct 2026, 06:19
32,246
-8
30 Oct 2026, 04:20
32,254
-9
29 Oct 2026, 05:19
32,263
-13
28 Oct 2026, 00:49
32,276
-3
27 Oct 2026, 01:07
32,279
-7
26 Oct 2026, 03:58
32,286
+1
25 Oct 2026, 02:37
32,285
-8
24 Oct 2026, 05:10
32,293
-9
23 Oct 2026, 06:26
32,302
-10
22 Oct 2026, 06:46
32,312
-8
20 Oct 2026, 23:50
32,320
-4
19 Oct 2026, 23:31
32,324
first reading
Engagement
2,303 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 173 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 32,222 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,890
773 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
796
of 2,303 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 772 of 773 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
2,303 (6 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
3,003,232
Reactions total
165,860
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 20:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
13h 17m
Average length
1m 27s
Measured directly from 553 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
207,564 reactions across 971 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
113,155
54.5%
😁
23,521
11.3%
🤬
23,205
11.2%
🤡
20,456
9.86%
❤
15,228
7.34%
🔥
5,707
2.75%
👎
3,716
1.79%
😢
2,576
1.24%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 971 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 207,564 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 4 October 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
153
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 972 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
136
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @neCT24. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 4 October 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 27 of 796 posts held from the last 30 days (3.39%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
❌🇪🇺Je nepravděpodobné, že by Ukrajina vstoupila do EU v příštích 10 letech, řekl agentuře Reuters analytik s odkazem na své rozhovory s evropskými představiteli.
„Cestujte po světě a uvidíte, že v mnoha z nich politici očekávají, že se Ukrajina nepřipojí ani za 10 let,“ řekl Gerald Knaus, předseda think-tanku European Stability Initiative.
Jakýkoli signál, že EU to s přistoupením Ukrajiny nemyslí vážně, by však moh…
❗️🇨🇿 Rajchl odmítá posílat Ukrajině 60 miliard korun ročně: Nebudeme házet peníze do černé díry!
Poslanec Jindřich Rajchl kritizoval další financování Ukrajiny z peněz českých daňových poplatníků. Poukázal na hluboký deficit ukrajinského rozpočtu a opakované korupční skandály. Zároveň ocenil pevný postoj premiéra Andreje Babiše vůči výhrůžkám německého kancléře Friedricha Merze.
Sledujte @neCT24 | 42TČen
❗️🇵🇱Pochod nezávislosti se ve Varšavě chýlí ke konci. Pochodu se zúčastnil prezident Karol Nawrocki.
Pochod již začal průvodem na Národním stadionu. Varšavské bezpečnostní centrum informovalo o účasti přibližně 250 000 lidí.
V jedné části průvodu pochodovala skupina oblečená v černém. Mnozí měli na sobě kukly nebo masky s lebkami. Nad nimi vlály zelené vlajky s nápisem Národní radikální tábor a černá vlajka s kelts…
‼️🇨🇿🇪🇺 Konečná kritizuje vedení EU pod Ursulou von der Leyen a Merzem! Upozorňuje na rostoucí chudobu, nízké příjmy domácností a vysoké ceny energií.
Podle ní evropské elity upřednostňují miliardovou podporu Ukrajiny před řešením problémů vlastních občanů a další financování se snaží prosazovat politickým nátlakem.
Sledujte @neCT24 | 42TČen
‼️🇺🇦🇪🇺DLHY KYJEVA ZAPLATIA ČLENSKÉ ŠTÁTY EÚ A ICH OBČANIA. UHRÍK K ROKOVANIAM O NOVEJ PÔŽIČKE PRE UKRAJINU.
Europoslanec a predseda hnutia Republika Milan Uhrík v rozhovore pre neČT24 odmietol nátlak kancelára Merza na podporu novej pôžičky pre Kyjev.
📌„Od začiatku to je bezpodmienečné financovanie Volodymyra Zelenského a jeho režimu, ktorý postupom času odokryl svoju pravú tvár. Dnes už s istotou vieme, že nikdy t…
📣🇨🇿 Jakl: Poplatky za ČT jsou záminka k mocenskému boji. Celé mi to zavání trochu koordinovanou akcí, kterou někdo podporuje, financuje, někdo si ji přeje.
Sledujte @neCT24 | 42TČen
🤡 Péťa Fialů se vůbec nezměnil. Stále má Ukrajinu na první místě, kritizuje Roberta Fica a vydírání Merza by bez mrknutí oka podpořil.
Sledujte @neCT24 | 42TČen
❗️🇪🇸Španělští demonstranti zapalují obchody, malují graffiti a rozbíjejí okna. V několika městech již došlo ke střetům s policií.
Španělská vláda na dnešek „ze solidarity“ pozastavila práci.
Stávka probíhá po celé zemi. Mnoho obchodů je zavřených a veřejná doprava nejezdí, což některým brání v cestě do práce, uvádí očití svědci.
Pro připomenutí, generální stávka v zemi začala o půlnoci. Lidé jsou nespokojeni s ros…
neČT24 pinned «⁉️🇸🇰🇪🇺JE ČLENSTVO SR V EÚ PRÁVOPLATNÉ, ALEBO IŠLO O KOMPLOT? HARABIN K OKOLNOSTIAM REFERENDA. Bývalý minister spravodlivosti SR Štefan Harabin prehovoril pre neČT24 o okolnostiach referenda o vstupe Slovenska do EÚ. 🗣️„Napriek tomu, že vstup do EÚ podporovali…»
⁉️🇸🇰🇪🇺JE ČLENSTVO SR V EÚ PRÁVOPLATNÉ, ALEBO IŠLO O KOMPLOT? HARABIN K OKOLNOSTIAM REFERENDA.
Bývalý minister spravodlivosti SR Štefan Harabin prehovoril pre neČT24 o okolnostiach referenda o vstupe Slovenska do EÚ.
🗣️„Napriek tomu, že vstup do EÚ podporovali prakticky všetky politické strany, mohlo sa stať, že referendum bude práve s nízkou účasťou voličov neplatné. Viacerí politici sa preto obávali o dostatočnú ú…
❗️🇵🇱„Poláci jsou v Polsku pány.“
Pod tímto heslem odstartoval Pochod za nezávislost ve Varšavě. Podle organizátorů by letošní pochod mohl být co do účasti rekordní. Očekává se, že se ho zúčastní až půl milionu lidí.
Sledujte @neCT24 | 42TČen
⚠️Podle údajů rakouského historika Hanse Hauptmanna stihly rakouské úřady v prvních šesti týdnech po vypuknutí první světové války – než ruská vojska obsadila Halič – popravit na základě obvinění ze spolupráce s Ruskem přibližně 30 tisíc haličských rusofilů, včetně žen.
To představuje zhruba 5 tisíc lidí týdně, tedy kolem 700 lidí denně.
Již dříve jsme psali, že před válkou působila v Haliči dvě vzájemně soupeřící …
🤬232😢20👎11❤9🤡2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,303 posts we hold for @neCT24. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@neCT24 edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 September 2026
Most recent edit
6 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Maršál Malinovskij @marsalMalinovskij · 20,571 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 26 September 2026
CZ24.NEWS @cz24news · 29,173 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 September 2026
DannyKollar / hlavný kanál @dannykollar · 52,046 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 September 2026
ZEM&VEK @zemavek · 32,427 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
InfoVojna @InfoVojnaOfficial · 48,529 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
Ľuboš Blaha @LubosBlahaSmer · 34,967 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
Casus Belli Live @casusbellilive · 39,812 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
🇨🇿 Новости | Прага, Чехия @czech_info · 26,669 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“neČT24” (@neCT24), 32,222 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neCT24.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.