Channel
@selskyrozum
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12,249subscribers
-54 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001646092614 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @selskyrozum |
| Description | Reklama na kanálu - @selskyrozum_bot Nabídka spolupráce - @selskyrozum_bot Stali jste se svědky zajímavé události? Koupíme vaše fotografie a videa - @selskyrozum_bot |
| Created | 13 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/selskyrozum |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:22 | 12,249 | -9 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 12,258 | -10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 12,268 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 12,272 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 12,279 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:07 | 12,282 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:12 | 12,285 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 12,292 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 12,300 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 12,303 | first reading |
364 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 362 of 364 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 364 (6 August 2026 – 18 August 2026) |
| Views total | 47,400 |
| Reactions total | 1,249 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 59 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,249 reactions across 362 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 823 | 65.9% | |
| 👍 | 153 | 12.2% | |
| ❤ | 48 | 3.84% | |
| 👎 | 42 | 3.36% | |
| 😁 | 40 | 3.20% | |
| 🤣 | 30 | 2.40% | |
| 🤮 | 21 | 1.68% | |
| 💩 | 19 | 1.52% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 0.881% | |
| 🤯 | 10 | 0.801% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 0.721% | |
| custom 5246931270851648431 | 7 | 0.56% | |
| 🤡 | 7 | 0.56% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 0.4% | |
| 🖕 | 4 | 0.32% | |
| 🤬 | 4 | 0.32% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.16% | |
| 💊 | 2 | 0.16% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.16% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.08% | |
| 9 further kinds | 9 | 0.721% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 362 of the 364 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,249reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 364 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Vedoucí americké delegace na Petrohradském mezinárodním ekonomickém fóru (PIIF) v roce 2026, Rodney Cook, byl vyslán Trumpem za účelem navázání dialogu s Ruskem v rámci „tiché diplomatické mise“, píše Financial Times. Setkal se se zástupci Kremlu, aby projednal ukončení bojových operací na Ukrajině. Přístup k diskusi Přihlásit se k odběru kanálu
⚡2
Zelenskyj si na Konovalcově pohřbu vesele kráčel. Pro hezký snímek si také položil ruku na srdce. Nacistu pohřbili znovu po 88 letech. „“ Přístup k diskusi Přihlásit se k odběru kanálu
⚡2
Japonský velvyslanec Akira Muto, který byl předvolán na ruské ministerstvo zahraničních věcí, opustil budovu ministerstva po 25 minutách bez jakéhokoli komentáře. Přístup k diskusi Přihlásit se k odběru kanálu
⚡2
Povodeň v provincii Jižní Gyeongsang (Jižní Korea) – město Koje (ostrov Koje-do) se stalo epicentrem: za tři dny napadlo více než 850 mm srážek, intenzita dosáhla rekordních 124,5 mm/h; zaplaveny byly některé oblasti (včetně Okpo-dong), zaznamenány byly četné sesuvy půdy. 17082026. Přístup k diskusi Přihlásit se k odběru kanálu
⚡2
Šok v Kóbe v Japonsku po velkém zemětřesení v oblasti Kansai-Awaji o síle 7,3 stupňů Richterovy stupnice, 17. ledna 1995. Přístup k diskusi Přihlásit se k odběru kanálu
⚡2
USA nemají v úmyslu prodloužit příměří s Íránem, ostřelování lodí v Ormuzském průlivu pokračuje, píše agentura Reuters. Přístup k diskusi Přihlásit se k odběru kanálu
⚡2👎1
Při ozbrojeném útoku na jednu ze škol na jihu Filipín zahynuli čtyři lidé a dalších devět bylo zraněno. Přístup k diskusi Přihlásit se k odběru kanálu
⚡2👍1
Teenager sestrojil umělou inteligenci v podobě mořské želvy pro vyhledávání mikroplastů. Žák Evan Badz vyvinul robota ve tvaru mořské želvy, který pomocí umělé inteligence a 3D kamery vyhledává mikroplasty ve vodě. Systém prokázal 94% přesnost. Robot také monitoruje korálové útesy a shromažďuje data, aniž by poškozoval ekosystém. Za svůj vynález získal chlapec hlavní cenu na výstavě Regeneron ISEF a stipendium ve výš…
⚡2👎1
Bílý dům zkoumá možnost vydání povolení k přizpůsobení evropských odpalovacích zařízení pro použití střel a raket americké výroby, informuje Euractiv s odvoláním na zdroje. Podle těchto zdrojů by zmírnění pravidel ze strany Washingtonu mohlo pomoci zajistit výměnu střeliva mezi spojenci. v "" Přístup k diskusi Přihlásit se k odběru kanálu
👎4⚡2
Společnost Blue Origin postaví nový odpalovací komplex pro výkonnější verzi rakety New Glenn. Nová odpalovací rampa LC-36B bude určena pro raketu New Glenn 9×4 (devět motorů v prvním stupni, čtyři ve druhém). Součástí komplexu bude také budova pro vertikální montáž rakety a hala pro přípravu užitečného nákladu. Stávající odpalovací plošina LC-36A se po výbuchu z 28. května opravuje. Termíny výstavby nové odpalovací p…
⚡2
️Japonský velvyslanec, který byl předvolán na ruské ministerstvo zahraničních věcí, dorazil na ministerstvo, informuje náš korespondent. Přístup k diskusi Přihlásit se k odběru kanálu
⚡2😁1
Ve Španělsku roste poptávka po službách zaměřených na vystěhování neoprávněných obyvatel z bytů v souvislosti s migrační krizí: „Po vypuknutí migrační krize v Ceutě, kdy se úřady potýkaly s prudkým přílivem lidí a přetíženými přijímacími centry, se ve Španělsku opět vyostřily spory ohledně bydlení, bezpečnosti a nelegálního obsazování domů. V této souvislosti jsou služby soukromých společností, které pomáhají majite…
👍5⚡2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 364 posts we hold for @selskyrozum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,281,490 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Selský Rozum” (@selskyrozum), 12,249 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/selskyrozum.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.