International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 50 days, net -266. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,619–32,965 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 06:37
32,659
-26
18 Sept 2026, 18:41
32,685
-16
16 Sept 2026, 13:17
32,701
-4
13 Sept 2026, 03:39
32,705
-2
11 Sept 2026, 05:20
32,707
-20
8 Sept 2026, 11:21
32,727
-32
5 Sept 2026, 06:21
32,759
+6
3 Sept 2026, 12:56
32,753
-9
2 Sept 2026, 05:43
32,762
-12
1 Sept 2026, 09:03
32,774
-17
31 Aug 2026, 06:17
32,791
-4
30 Aug 2026, 03:56
32,795
+5
29 Aug 2026, 06:04
32,790
-4
28 Aug 2026, 08:07
32,794
-4
27 Aug 2026, 10:25
32,798
+4
26 Aug 2026, 10:44
32,794
-3
25 Aug 2026, 10:14
32,797
-3
24 Aug 2026, 10:08
32,800
-10
22 Aug 2026, 21:12
32,810
-4
21 Aug 2026, 14:29
32,814
first reading
Engagement
1,401 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 84 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.97%
avg views ÷ 32,659 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,950
669 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
670
of 1,401 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 666 of 669 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held
1,401 (6 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total
1,304,451
Reactions total
68,257
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 07:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈79,900
Videos
≈32,000
Links
≈97,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6h 31m
Average length
1m 15s
Measured directly from 314 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
105,453 reactions across 993 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
25,054
23.8%
💊
13,155
12.5%
😁
12,202
11.6%
🤡
11,006
10.4%
😡
9,271
8.79%
❤
6,892
6.54%
👏
4,398
4.17%
👎
4,357
4.13%
💯
3,841
3.64%
🤔
3,440
3.26%
🔥
3,179
3.01%
🙈
2,099
1.99%
🙏
1,498
1.42%
🤯
1,157
1.10%
😢
1,056
1.00%
😱
848
0.804%
👌
845
0.801%
🤩
367
0.348%
😭
224
0.212%
🕊
195
0.185%
4 further kinds
369
0.35%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 994 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105,453 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 18 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇧🇪🇪🇺 Brusel vyzýva krajiny EÚ, aby znížili spotrebu plynu a elektrickej energie kvôli vysokým cenám.
O tom sa uvádza v liste európskeho komisára pre energetiku Jørgensena, ktorý si preštudovala agentúra Reuters.
▪️Pozvite priateľov | odber t.me/zemavek
🇨🇳🇺🇸 Čínsky viceprezident sa v prejave v OSN nepriamo vymedzil voči USA. Nespomenul ich, ale uviedol, že treba rešpektovať suverenitu krajín v Perzskom zálive a že „príslušná krajina“ by sa mala prestať vyhrážať Kube a mala by zrušiť ropnú blokádu.
Podľa Reuters ide o ostrý kontrast s priateľskou atmosférou, ktorá pred pár dňami panovala počas štátnej návštevy čínskeho prezidenta Si Ťin-pchinga vo Washingtone.
„Veľ…
🌅 Dobré ráno, víta Vás tím Telegram Zem&Vek
🗓 Nedeľa, 27. september 2026
🥂 Meniny má Cyprián, všetko najlepšie...
Už v týchto chvíľach pre Vás pripravujeme prvé dnešné správy. Aj dnes sa od 8h rána až do polnoci budeme starať o to, aby Vám pravidelne prichádzali aktuálne správy a zaujímavosti z domova aj zo sveta.
Tešíme sa, že ste s nami...
Váš TLG Z&V tím.
❤️
🌛 DOBRÚ NOC...
Ďakujeme, že ste s nami a Telegram kanál Z&V je pre vás dôveryhodným zdrojom informácií, aké v korporátnej prorežimovej propagande nenájdete.
📱Náš Telegram kanál Z&V môžete podporiť ľubovoľnou čiastkou na tomto čísle účtu pre Telegram Z&V:
SK17 0900 0000 0050 8078 7335
💳 Ak chcete, aby bola vaša podpora viditeľná, podporte nás na transparentnom účte.
IBAN: SK87 0900 0000 0051 1928 5181
https://www…
🇨🇦 Ako sa Kanada stala hlavným mestom eutanázie na svete..
Za 10 rokov Kanada pomocou eutanázie posunula do iného sveta približne 100 000 ľudí. Toto číslo je porovnateľné s celkovým počtom obetí prvej a druhej svetovej vojny v Kanade.
▪️Pozvite priateľov | odber t.me/zemavek
🦠 Riaditeľ WHO sa obáva vzniku pandémie kvôli novému patogénu.
Vznik nového respiračného patogénu môže viesť k pandémii, ktorá by bola porovnateľná s COVID-19, vyhlásil riaditeľ WHO, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.
"Jedným z obáv je, že sa môže objaviť [nový] respiračný patogén. A to, zase, môže viesť k podobným následkom, ako tie, ktoré spôsobili COVID,"
uviedol.
Podľa Ghebreyesusa je nová pandémia len otázka času...…
🇺🇦 Ukrajina je krajina zázrakov… Je to, bezpochyby, svojrázny, neobyčajný, doslova unikátny štát, v ktorom je na najvyšších štátnych a politických postoch bezkonkurenčne najviac komikov, hercov, pajácov, cirkusantov a iných „odborníkov,“ ako v hociktorom inom štáte na svete.
O tom, že hlava štátu je bývalý komik, herec a zabávač, vedia asi všetci ako doma, tak aj v zahraničí. Avšak iba málokto si všimol, že umeleckí…
💭 Mark Zuckerberg vyhlásil, že o päť rokov bude mať každý človek osobnú umelú inteligenciu, ktorá bude poznať jeho život a bude za neho vykonávať rôzne úlohy.
„Myslím, že ak sa posunieme o päť rokov vpred, každý bude mať AI agenta, ktorý bude dokonale rozumieť vašim cieľom a všetkému, čo vás obklopuje, a bude vám pomáhať pri plnení rôznych úloh.“
„Mnoho ľudí hovorí o umelej inteligencii tak, ako keby to bolo niečo …
🇷🇺🇺🇸🇨🇳 Putin nezávidí Si Ťin-pchingovi jeho vzťahy s Trumpom...
Prezident Vladimir Putin sa takto vyjadril 25. septembra 2026 na tlačovej konferencii počas Fóra zjednotených kultúr v Petrohrade. Odpovedal tým na otázku novinára, ktorý sa ho priamo opýtal, či nežiarli (nezávidí) na rozvíjajúce sa vzťahy a nedávne stretnutie čínskeho prezidenta Si Ťin-pchinga s americkým prezidentom Donaldom Trumpom v USA.
Putin vyhl…
❤78👍68😁2🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,401 posts we hold for @zemavek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 18 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
InfoVojna @InfoVojnaOfficial · 49,118 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
DannyKollar / hlavný kanál @dannykollar · 53,045 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 September 2026
Casus Belli Live @casusbellilive · 40,112 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
Ľuboš Blaha @LubosBlahaSmer · 35,415 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
Maršál Malinovskij @marsalMalinovskij · 20,691 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 26 September 2026
CZ24.NEWS @cz24news · 29,422 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 September 2026
neČT24 @neCT24 · 32,485 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ZEM&VEK” (@zemavek), 32,659 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zemavek.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.