Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for To je náš svět

Channel

To je náš svět

@to_je_nas_svet

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,054subscribers

-50 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001757673217
TypeChannel
Username@to_je_nas_svet
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/to_je_nas_svet

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,05412,10812,0816 August 2026 — 12,104 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,106 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,104 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,103 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,106 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,105 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,108 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,107 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,101 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,105 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,102 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,095 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,090 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,091 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,090 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,086 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,080 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,076 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,078 subscribers4 September 2026 — 12,077 subscribers7 September 2026 — 12,076 subscribers10 September 2026 — 12,071 subscribers12 September 2026 — 12,074 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,067 subscribers16 September 2026 — 12,058 subscribers18 September 2026 — 12,054 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 43 days, net -50. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,046–12,116 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 10:5612,054-4
16 Sept 2026, 01:0012,058-9
14 Sept 2026, 07:2012,067-7
12 Sept 2026, 15:5812,074+3
10 Sept 2026, 12:1612,071-5
7 Sept 2026, 11:2012,076-1
4 Sept 2026, 12:2112,077-1
2 Sept 2026, 23:3712,078+2
1 Sept 2026, 18:0412,076-4
31 Aug 2026, 17:4412,080-6
30 Aug 2026, 17:4812,086-4
27 Aug 2026, 21:0512,090-1
26 Aug 2026, 21:2712,091+1
24 Aug 2026, 18:3912,090-5
23 Aug 2026, 05:4712,095-7
20 Aug 2026, 17:5712,102-3
19 Aug 2026, 18:0212,105+4
17 Aug 2026, 19:5612,101-6
15 Aug 2026, 00:5612,107-1
13 Aug 2026, 14:1712,108first reading

Engagement

489 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.89%
avg views ÷ 12,054 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,070
163 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
163
of 489 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 157 of 163 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held489 (6 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total174,727
Reactions total12,577
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 05m
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 120 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

45,760 reactions across 478 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍13,58229.7%
🤮8,27118.1%
😁5,57812.2%
🤡5,21911.4%
💯3,1916.97%
👌2,9156.37%
🤬2,8636.26%
❤2,3165.06%
👎6431.41%
🍾2900.634%
🔥2900.634%
🙏1920.42%
🕊1640.358%
😱1580.345%
😢880.192%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 478 of the 489 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45,760 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 489 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 21:10 UTC202 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

☝️ Absurdní válka v Perském zálivu. Mínus 20% světové produkce ropy. Ropa je ale paradoxně levnější než dřív. Dolar je také levnější než dřív. Benzín a nafta by měly být levnější. — Ale palivo je dražší!!! A to se ještě vaši politici pyšní, jak prý snížili daně a regulují ceny a drží čerpadláře pod krkem, aby nepředražovali. LHÁŘI. t.me/to_je_nas_svet

💯9

2 Sept 2026, 21:06 UTC270 views21 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🤡Zelenskyj: "Obdrželi jsme informace, že první letecké společnosti začaly odmítat lety na ruská letiště poté, co jsme oznámili hrozbu dronů v ruském vzdušném prostoru. Toto je správná a zcela logická reakce na stávající situaci, na vše, co způsobila válka, kterou Putin nechce ukončit." t.me/to_je_nas_svet

🤡11🤮5😁5

2 Sept 2026, 20:54 UTC243 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

😂Fotografování prázdných regálů je zakázáno – tak znějí varování v některých ukrajinských supermarketech. A někde už dokonce vymysleli i příslušnou pokutu. t.me/to_je_nas_svet

😁13

2 Sept 2026, 20:43 UTC290 views17 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🔥Kyjev, Vinnicja, Sumy, Oděsa, Nikolajev, Dněpropetrovsk, Černigov – vše v plamenech. Odvetné údery proměňují vojenské objekty po celé Ukrajině v prach. Přístavy a železniční uzly, sklady ukrajinských ozbrojených sil, sklady pohonných hmot, vojenské výrobní objekty – vše je mazáno z povrchu zemského. Ruské ozbrojené síly pracují nepřetržitě a bez dnů volna. t.me/to_je_nas_svet

👌15👍2

2 Sept 2026, 20:39 UTC283 views25 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Komediální úroveň stoupla o dva levely výše. 😂t.me/to_je_nas_svet

🤡23🤮2

2 Sept 2026, 19:41 UTC539 views26 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🟠Trump slíbil, že zveřejní záběry z nucené mobilizace Ukrajinců Zelenského psy. Reportér: Už dlouho říkáte, že k této válce nikdy nemělo dojít. A také jste řekl, a měl jste pravdu, že Bidenova administrativa spolu s velkou částí mainstreamových médií lhala o počtu Ukrajinců, kteří v této válce zemřeli. A teď vidíme, že tam není dostatek mladých mužů. 📝Pak novinář položil nečekaně přímou a trefnou otázku: Z Ukrajiny p…

🤡20👍4❤2

2 Sept 2026, 19:34 UTC522 views28 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🗣 Mezi Vladimirem Putinem a Volodymyrem Zelenským je vážný spor – Trump "Měli by ukončit tuto hloupou válku, ale my v ní pokračujeme. Zastavil jsem osm válek. Osm. Některé z nich byly považovány za mnohem těžší zastavit než tuto a já je zastavil. Ale mezi těmito dvěma prezidenty je obrovský spor." t.me/to_je_nas_svet

🤡24🤬4

2 Sept 2026, 18:23 UTC792 views42 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 Rakety pro Patriot se zpožďují. ➖ Marco Rubio prohlásil, že rakety pro Patriot potřebují především Spojené státy. Washington bude Ukrajinu i nadále podporovat, ale v rámci svých vlastních možností, tedy v podstatně menším množství. ➖ Jednání o převodu licence na výrobu raket Patriot do Kyjeva probíhají, Rubio však uznal, že i s licencí bude výstavba továren trvat několik let. To nevyřeší krátkodobý problém s ned…

🤡32👍7❤2🤬1

2 Sept 2026, 18:21 UTC781 views89 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🗣— Rusko zničilo všechny diplomatické vztahy. — Ale to vy jste uzavřeli ruské konzuláty! Zástupce velvyslance Spolkové republiky Německo v Moskvě, Finke, prohlásil, že Rusko zničilo všechny diplomatické mosty a opustil ruské Ministerstvo zahraničí. t.me/to_je_nas_svet

🤮59🤡19😁7❤2👍2

2 Sept 2026, 16:26 UTC984 views76 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🙈Trump přemýšlí o přejmenování Hormuzského průlivu na "Průliv Trumpa". "Teď, když je pod kontrolou USA, neměli bychom přejmenovat Hormuzský průliv na PRŮLIV TRUMPA??? Stejně jako Amerika, se stane "žhavější" než kdy předtím!" t.me/to_je_nas_svet

🤡50🤮20😁5❤1

2 Sept 2026, 16:24 UTC≈1,060 views88 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

😂Koluje na sítích. t.me/to_je_nas_svet

👌46🤮28😁9🤡3👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 489 posts we hold for @to_je_nas_svet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

neČT24
@neCT24 · 32,485
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
CZ24.NEWS
@cz24news · 29,438
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 September 2026
ZEM&VEK
@zemavek · 32,659
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
Casus Belli Live
@casusbellilive · 40,112
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
InfoVojna
@InfoVojnaOfficial · 49,118
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
DannyKollar / hlavný kanál
@dannykollar · 53,045
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 September 2026
Ľuboš Blaha
@LubosBlahaSmer · 35,472
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“To je náš svět” (@to_je_nas_svet), 12,054 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/to_je_nas_svet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.