Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🎼Oskar Rózsa official 🎼

Channel

🎼Oskar Rózsa official 🎼

@oskarrozsaofficial

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

7,182subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002421970299
TypeChannel
Username@oskarrozsaofficial
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/oskarrozsaofficial

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,1577,2077,1828 August 2026 — 7,205 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,206 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,207 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,203 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,191 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,188 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,186 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,179 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,167 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,157 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,185 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,182 subscribers8 August 202615 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 39 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,150–7,215 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 23:387,182-3
12 Sept 2026, 03:007,185+28
8 Sept 2026, 01:217,157-10
3 Sept 2026, 02:277,167-12
31 Aug 2026, 04:557,179-7
25 Aug 2026, 00:347,186-2
21 Aug 2026, 10:067,188-3
18 Aug 2026, 00:277,191-12
15 Aug 2026, 00:037,203-4
11 Aug 2026, 23:327,207+1
8 Aug 2026, 14:447,206+1
8 Aug 2026, 03:167,205first reading

Engagement

57 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 57 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16m 22s
Average length
2m 44s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

10,012 reactions across 56 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,87728.7%
💯2,78727.8%
👏1,29612.9%
❤7237.22%
🤬6196.18%
👌6096.08%
😁5675.66%
😈1631.63%
😢820.819%
🤯820.819%
👎580.579%
🙏470.469%
custom 5463423955014529788340.34%
custom 5357199488115030155320.32%
🤔190.19%
🥰110.11%
😎60.06%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,012 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 56 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @oskarrozsaofficial. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 57 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 19:06 UTC≈1,600 views167 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🚨 A ještě jedna perlička na závěr: "Nejvíce znepokojivé bylo jejich nezveřejnění, že autoři jsou zaměstnáni ve výzkumné instituci pro vakcíny s doloženým financováním od výrobců mRNA vakcín. To představuje jasný střet zájmů, který měl být zveřejněn v souladu se standardní akademickou publikační praxí." Takže autoři z SAV nepřiznali, že byli v minuosti placeni vyrobci mRNA vakcín(!)

😈75🤬51💯23👍14❤2😁2

19 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC≈1,250 views158 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @ukrovid1984

Další věc: při výrobě vznikají tzv. hybridy RNA:DNA - dvouvlákno, kde jedno vlákno je RNA vakcíny a druhé je zbytková DNA. Je to slepené dohromady a drží to jak luteránská víra. Tyhle hybridy jsou přitom odolné vůči enzymům DNázám, které je PRÝ měly rozsekat, hned v továrně na ty malé kousíčky. Ovšem tohle se tenkrát v továrně nestalo. Nerozsekali je, protože ten slepenec tomu bránil. A oni to nevěděli. A tyhle neb…

💯117👍30❤9👌1😁1

19 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC≈1,180 views143 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @ukrovid1984

Přátelé, tak TOHLE je pecka. Kotlár to konečně vzal za správný konec. Vzal tu analýzu Slovenské akademie věd, která měla uklidnit slovenskou veřejnost, že ve vzorcích žádná cizí DNA není, a dal tu analýzu vyhodnotit snad jediným třem lidem na světě, kteří tomu fakt rozumí. A tohle už fakt nepůjde okecat. Tohle je game changer. Jmenují se Kevin McKernan, David J. Speicher a Jessica Rose. Přičemž McKernan je TEN, kte…

💯101🤯16👍15❤11

19 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC≈1,440 views106 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @REJ00000Photo

https://t.me/REJ00000

👍67💯37❤1😁1

19 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC623 views117 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @SavennaM

‼️ Minister spravodlivosti konečne vyhovel žiadosti Jána Kaľavského a podal dovolanie na Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky, lebo zistil viacero porušení zákona v rozsudku nad Jánom Kaľavským. Jána Kaľavského však napriek tomu nechal naďalej vo väzení a teda nenariadil jeho prepustenie z výkonu trestu, čo nás mrzí, ale napĺňa aj obavami o bezpečnosť Jána Kaľavského ‼️

👍73🙏44

19 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC≈1,560 views148 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Už to je obrovský úspech ľudstva, že sa progresivistický mor podarilo lokalizovať a zastaviť šírenie nebezpečnej nákazy. Trpezlivosť-rezistencia- odpor- sloboda.🇸🇰

👍127👌15💯4😁2

19 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC≈1,760 views157 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Vážené online médiá a periodiká, na základe neoprávneného nakladania s umeleckým výkonom zo dňa 15.VIII. 2026 a jeho zverejňovania bez súhlasu umelcov, neodkladne žiadam o: okamžité stiahnutie akéhokoľvek hudobného výkonu z tohto večera zo všetkých online priestorov na oficiálnych verejných kanáloch a prezdielavaných platformách. V opačnom prípade budem nútený pristúpiť k právnym krokom v zmysle zákona. Podotýkam, …

👍134👏14❤4😎4👌1

19 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC≈1,810 views106 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Zamýšľam sa, kto z tej nadrozmernej škály pojmu “hudobník” to tak mohol byť…! Zaujímala by ma jeho hudba😎 https://t.me/mimisramova/70571

😁102👍3🤯1

19 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC≈1,820 views103 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://youtu.be/Nn7XsC8QT8o?is=MAdcKmWNWMRARVR-

👍82😁17👏3❤1

19 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC≈1,880 views216 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Hádanka dňa, čo je to?: 1.Škót 2.mačka 3. protard v škótskom za mačku

👍111😁75🤯19😈5custom 53571994881150301553👏2❤1

18 Aug 2026, 22:33 UTC≈2,080 views168 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Dunning-Krugerov efekt u protardov? ide o efekt kognitívnej zaujatosti, pri ktorej jednotlivci s obmedzenými znalosťami v určitej oblasti výrazne preceňujú svoje vlastné schopnosti. Inými slovami, sú natoľko neznalí veci, že ani netušia, ako veľmi neznalí sú. Ich ignorantstvo vedie k preceneniu samých seba, čo prejavuje povýšenectvom a aroganciou. Knižné typy vedia, že Dunning-Krugerov efekt vo väčšej miere ohrozuj…

👌94💯58👍10👏4❤1👎1

18 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC≈2,310 views175 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Príde čas, keď moderná veda dokáže súvislosť príčin a dôsledkov degenerácie duševného zdravia vplyvom aktivity na Facebooku. Skúmajte psychologické dopady sociálnych sietí na vašich blízkych.

👏104👍41💯27❤2😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @oskarrozsaofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@oskarrozsaofficial edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTCAnonymous Poll1,200 voters approx.

Kto je podľa vás zodpovedný za polarizáciu slovenskej spoločnosti?

  1. Fico6%
  2. Čaputová41%
  3. Matovič68%

The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q13537940 on Wikidata, read 13 September 2026
LabelOskar Rózsa
DescriptionSlovak musician

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🎼Oskar Rózsa official 🎼” (@oskarrozsaofficial), 7,182 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oskarrozsaofficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.