Channel
@uk100a
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,408subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001780879580 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @uk100a |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/uk100a |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:26 | 4,408 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 4,416 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 4,414 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:23 | 4,414 | first reading |
85 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 76 of 85 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 85 (7 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 21,149 |
| Reactions total | 919 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 33 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
919 reactions across 76 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 272 | 29.6% | |
| ❤ | 146 | 15.9% | |
| 😁 | 130 | 14.1% | |
| 👎 | 69 | 7.51% | |
| 💩 | 67 | 7.29% | |
| 🤮 | 53 | 5.77% | |
| 🤬 | 39 | 4.24% | |
| 💯 | 29 | 3.16% | |
| 👏 | 24 | 2.61% | |
| 🤡 | 21 | 2.29% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 1.96% | |
| 🍾 | 11 | 1.20% | |
| 💊 | 10 | 1.09% | |
| 😡 | 7 | 0.762% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 0.762% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 0.653% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 0.326% | |
| 🖕 | 2 | 0.218% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.218% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.109% | |
| 2 further kinds | 2 | 0.218% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 76 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 919reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇹🇷🇺🇦 Ukrajina získala od Turecka 70 balistických raket M39 ATACMS a 12 systémů M270 - USA spouští proceduru předání. Jedná se o velký balík americké výzbroje z tureckých zásob: 📍Ukrajina má obdržet 70 balistických raket M39 ATACMS a 12 raketometů M270, které vypouštějí GMLRS a ATACMS. 📍V balíku je také 2524 kazetových raket M26 ráže 227 mm a 47 tisíc 203 mm kazetových granátů M509A1 pro samohybné houfnice 2S7 "Pion…
💩6
🇺🇸 CNN: Generál Dan Caine, předseda sboru náčelníků štábů, konkrétně vysvětlil vysokým představitelům administrativy Trumpa, že Spojené státy potřebují "najít východ" z války s Íránem, protože se domnívá, že dostupné vojenské možnosti další eskalace konfliktu mohou mít negativní důsledky.
😁12
🇷🇺 Dmitrij Medveděv: "Stará čarodějnice Uršula vystavila ukrajinské vlajky na svém profilu. To znamená, že kašle na Evropu - vše, co je důležité, je banderovská klika a sankce. Protože v EU je všechno tak úžasné, že? Co by tahle šílená gynekoložka neříkala, Rusko rozhodně vyhraje!"
👍6🤮4
🤡 Hillary Clintonová navrhla nominovat Trumpa na Nobelovu cenu míru, pokud ukončí konflikt ve prospěch Ukrajiny: "Mohli bychom pomoci Ukrajincům ukončit válku tím, že jim pomůžeme bránit se. A tehdy by získal Nobelovu cenu míru. Jsem asi jediný člověk, kdo o tom mluvil už před několika měsíci. Pokud dosáhne důstojného míru pro Ukrajinu, při kterém nebude muset vzdát žádná území a bude mít možnost vrátit se k normá…
😁6🤮5🖕2🤯2
⚡️Optovláknový almanach. Masakr. Epizoda 7. V ruské armádě je nemálo prvotřídních pilotů FPV dronů, mezi nimi se nachází skutečné legendy, jejichž bojová cesta je poseta stovkami zasažených cílů protivníka. Další vydání "Optovláknového almanachu" je věnováno bojové práci proti pěchotě VSU pilota s volacím znakem "Buratino", autora kanálu "SvinoREZ". Legendární optik, který poprvé zasáhl tank v Kurské oblasti, aut…
👍7❤1😁1
💥 Ruská armáda pomocí dronů "Geraň-4" zaútočila na místo stálé dislokace 1. odděleného praporu námořní pěchoty 36. obrněného pluku VSU na poloostrově Aljaudy v blízkosti Nikolaeva. V důsledku příletu byla poškozena řada budov. Na území objektu vypukl požár.
👍12😁2❤1
🇧🇬 Dron, který spadl v Bulharsku - je ukrajinský - inisterstvo obrany Bulharska. Pravděpodobně se jedná o dron-nástrahu "Maja", který je široce používán Ukrajinskou armádou. Ministerstvo dodalo, že v tuto chvíli nejsou důvody se domnívat, že incident měl "úmyslný charakter."
😁10
❗️UPDATE: Čestmírova záhada – upřesnění Thomas Paukner zveřejnil nové upřesnění ke svému textu o vrtulníku „Čestmír“ a původní článek dočasně stáhl, dokud nebude jasně doložen původ stroje — minimálně jeho výrobní číslo. Připouští možnost, že mohlo dojít k záměně: tedy že původně veřejně prezentovaný slovenský Black Hawk OM-BHB nebyl nakonec tím strojem, který byl předán Ukrajině, a že iniciativa Dárek pro Putina m…
😁7
⚡️Přesný přílet dronu do celé skupiny ozbrojenců VSU, kteří vyběhli z autobusu. Asi si mysleli, že jsou v naprostém bezpečí, když se nacházejí v týlu.
👍16
🇷🇸 "Řekněte nám, Evropanům, co přesně můžeme udělat, abychom vám pomohli… zabíjet více Rusů?" Jaké zajímavé otázky pokládají němečtí "novináři" na tiskové konferenci v Bělehradu.
💩21😡7
❗️Paukner odpálil další bombu! Sbírky pro Ukrajinu v tomto kontextu dostávají zcela nový význam. Kde je vrtulník Čestmír pro Ukrajinu? Podle všeho na Ukrajinu vůbec neodletěl. Co na to Strnad? Veřejnost vybrala přes 72 milionů korun na vrtulník Black Hawk „Čestmír“ pro Ukrajinu. Podle veřejných informací měl být stroj předán ukrajinské straně. 🤔Jenže Paukner upozorňuje, že stroj spojovaný s označením OM-BHB / 80-23…
❤6😁6
🇩🇪 "Tento kartel, tato vláda musí odejít!" V Německu požaduje zhruba 10 tisíc lidí odvolání Merzovy vlády. Vydali se na mítink ve městě Plauen. Vyzývají k novým volbám a okamžité deportaci nelegálních a migrantů, kteří spáchali trestné činy.
👍19😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @uk100a. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 662,622 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ukrajina bez cenzury” (@uk100a), 4,408 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uk100a.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.