Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -630. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53,014–53,836 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 16:19
53,111
+2
15 Sept 2026, 16:18
53,109
-39
13 Sept 2026, 21:20
53,148
-25
12 Sept 2026, 06:17
53,173
-9
10 Sept 2026, 02:18
53,182
-60
6 Sept 2026, 20:57
53,242
-23
4 Sept 2026, 05:17
53,265
-28
2 Sept 2026, 19:59
53,293
-24
1 Sept 2026, 18:08
53,317
-29
31 Aug 2026, 14:55
53,346
-21
30 Aug 2026, 17:55
53,367
-14
29 Aug 2026, 20:06
53,381
-6
28 Aug 2026, 17:41
53,387
-21
27 Aug 2026, 18:16
53,408
-24
26 Aug 2026, 15:54
53,432
-8
25 Aug 2026, 17:07
53,440
-18
24 Aug 2026, 17:38
53,458
-32
23 Aug 2026, 02:17
53,490
-14
21 Aug 2026, 15:15
53,504
-32
20 Aug 2026, 16:13
53,536
first reading
Engagement
227 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 110 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.56%
avg views ÷ 53,111 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,480
134 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
134
of 227 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held
227 (4 August 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total
466,643
Reactions total
14,044
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 05:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,730
Videos
≈1,300
Links
≈4,660
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
9h 28m
Average length
9m 01s
Measured directly from 63 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
23,908 reactions across 227 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
8,773
36.7%
👍
6,190
25.9%
🔥
3,883
16.2%
🎉
1,367
5.72%
😁
497
2.08%
👏
483
2.02%
❤🔥
354
1.48%
🤔
324
1.36%
💩
227
0.949%
🗿
173
0.724%
👻
151
0.632%
💘
145
0.606%
⚡
136
0.569%
🍾
135
0.565%
🤣
120
0.502%
👎
99
0.414%
💔
96
0.402%
🤮
93
0.389%
🤷♂
53
0.222%
🥰
51
0.213%
34 further kinds
558
2.33%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 227 of the 227 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23,908 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 227 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 227 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @muzika_chtivo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 227 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.441%
1 of 227 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,420
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,500
over 226 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFGgAUqX
1
7 August 2026
7 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 227 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Фильмы - это не сахарная вата. Это пули в мозг.
— Майкл Манн
Канал Fighter inside - это путь самурая.
От Тарантино до Кар-Вая, от Netflix до Канн.
Никаких пресных рецензий и скучных клише - только честные мнения и живые эмоции.
Мониторим все крутые новинки кино и сериалов, отыскиваем синефильские шедевры.
Иногда грубовато, всегда с юмором, но только искренне.
Зайди и попробуй - Fighter inside
23 сентября 1930 года родился американский эстрадный певец и пианист
Рэй Чарльз (Ray Charles)
Пел в различных стилях, особенно прославился как исполнитель в стилях соул и ритм-энд-блюз. В США считается одним из наиболее значительных музыкантов послевоенного времени. Рэю Чарльзу принадлежат около 70 альбомов.
Слушать
YouTube / Яндекс музыка / Vk / Apple Music / Spotify
Музыкальное чтиво | мы в
TG | MAX| YOUTUBE
Госпожи и господа, (Богемный) люфт спешит поделиться свежим синтовым звуком.
Танцевальный слегка ироничный трек, про чувства и не про чувства, движ, немного саксофона, ретро синты. Самые сладкие аналоги приторности невзаимной любви, которой всегда так мало, что невозможно остановиться. Слушайте везде, но есть и ссылка!
The Doors: почему фанаты ищут подсказки в песнях Jim Morrison
Смерть Джима Моррисона до сих пор окружена слухами. 3 июля 1971 года он умер в Париже, а тело обнаружили в ванной его квартиры. Причиной смерти официально считался сердечный приступ, при этом вскрытие не проводилось.
Отсутствие подробного расследования породило множество теорий, а поклонники начали искать «предсказания» в песнях The Doors. Особенно часто…
22 сентября 1958 родился итальянский певец, исполнитель классической и популярной музыки
Андреа Бочелли (Andrea Bocelli)
Слушать
YouTube / Яндекс музыка / Vk / Apple Music / Spotify
Музыкальное чтиво | мы в
TG | MAX| YOUTUBE
Сегодня советую интереснейший музыкальный канал — Vintage Mag.
Здесь жив дух винила и куча интересного о культовых пластинках из прошлого! Свежий взгляд на классику хип-хопа, джаза и соула, редчайшие фото и удивительные факты, о которых вы даже не догадывались.
Подписываемся: https://t.me/vntmg
Культ
Yo La Tengo — «I Can Hear the Heart Beating as One» 1997
В 1997 году Yo La Tengo выпустили «I Can Hear the Heart Beating as One» — восьмой альбом, где инди-рок перестаёт быть одним жанром. Здесь соседствуют шумный рок, dream pop, психоделия, krautrock, босса-нова, фолк, электроника и поп.
Ira Kaplan, Georgia Hubley и James McNew свободно переходят от перегруженных гитар «Sugarcube» к мягкой электронике «Autu…
21 сентября 1972 года родился британский музыкант
Лиам Галлахер (Liam Gallagher)
Наибольшую известность получивший как вокалист и один из основателей группы Oasis.
Слушать
YouTube / Vk / Apple Music / Spotify
Музыкальное чтиво | мы в
TG | MAX| YOUTUBE
❤75🎉46👍26🔥3🍓2🍾1👻1💘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 227 posts we hold for @muzika_chtivo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой джазовый музыкант считается одним из первых, кто начал использовать круговое (непрерывное) дыхание в импровизации?
John Coltrane47%
Sonny Rollins21%
Rahsaan Roland Kirk12%
Evan Shaw Parker19%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 227 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
МЕЛОДИЯ @firmamelodiya · 36,243 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
ТОПОР НОВОСТИ 2.0 @topornews77 · 37,799 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 29 August 2026
Пушной 🔥HOT DED🔥 @pushnoypro · 48,690 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
Аудиокниги | Книги @audio_freebook · 23,687 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 17 September 2026
Кино и голуби @kino_i_golubi · 46,223 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
Камера, Мотор! @kammotor · 24,422 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 September 2026
Музей @muzei_tg · 53,616 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
Bohemia of Postmodernism | Культура @kartiny_art_iskusstvo · 64,086 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
Nothing Book | Искусство @kartiny_muzei_zhivopis · 121,510 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 August 2026
Art Cinema | Nonconformism | Мода @Kino_iskusstvo_vintazh · 89,265 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
Пейзаж на холсте | Галерея @kartiny_tg · 67,125 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
надо глянуть. @need2watch · 23,556 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
Sodom and Gomorrah @SodomAnd_Gomorrah · 32,915 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 4 September 2026
Мане или Моне? @maneormone1 · 85,868 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
Дневник Академика Павлова | Саморазвитие @academicpavlov · 114,488 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 August 2026
Фигуры и формы @sculpturearts · 29,540 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 September 2026
Мировая Живопись @mir_painting · 37,212 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026
Бестиа́рий @bestiariy_mif · 72,941 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
Советские плакаты @sovetskiyplakat · 44,955 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 August 2026
Płótno @kartiny_zhivopis_galereya · 85,644 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 August 2026
Argentum @fotoartset · 49,501 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
Вечная философия @tim_philosophy · 67,686 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
Люстра | Книжная иллюстрация @lustra_tg · 25,706 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 September 2026
ARTерия | Искусство @kartiny_arteriart · 162,329 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Музыкальное чтиво” (@muzika_chtivo), 53,111 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/muzika_chtivo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.