Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Пейзаж на холсте | Галерея

Channel

Пейзаж на холсте | Галерея

@kartiny_tg

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

67,421subscribers

+66 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001965306551
TypeChannel
Usernames@art_gallery @kartiny_tg
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held19
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kartiny_tg

Growth

67,33967,45367,3966 August 2026 — 67,355 subscribers6 August 2026 — 67,355 subscribers6 August 2026 — 67,340 subscribers6 August 2026 — 67,340 subscribers7 August 2026 — 67,339 subscribers8 August 2026 — 67,340 subscribers9 August 2026 — 67,350 subscribers9 August 2026 — 67,350 subscribers10 August 2026 — 67,347 subscribers11 August 2026 — 67,381 subscribers11 August 2026 — 67,383 subscribers12 August 2026 — 67,450 subscribers12 August 2026 — 67,453 subscribers13 August 2026 — 67,441 subscribers13 August 2026 — 67,441 subscribers14 August 2026 — 67,443 subscribers14 August 2026 — 67,442 subscribers15 August 2026 — 67,422 subscribers16 August 2026 — 67,421 subscribers67,4216 August 202616 August 2026
19 measurements spanning 10 days, net +66. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 67,322–67,470 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 05:3667,421-1
15 Aug 2026, 20:2667,422-20
14 Aug 2026, 13:1467,442-1
14 Aug 2026, 12:4767,443+2
13 Aug 2026, 02:5467,441no change
13 Aug 2026, 02:4767,441-12
12 Aug 2026, 03:5267,453+3
12 Aug 2026, 02:2267,450+67
11 Aug 2026, 03:0867,383+2
11 Aug 2026, 01:4267,381+34
10 Aug 2026, 02:3267,347-3
9 Aug 2026, 00:5767,350no change
9 Aug 2026, 00:5067,350+10
8 Aug 2026, 02:0467,340+1
7 Aug 2026, 00:3067,339-1
6 Aug 2026, 22:4567,340no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:3867,340-15
6 Aug 2026, 11:0067,355no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:5367,355first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.92%
avg views ÷ 67,421 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,670
45 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held45 (29 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total209,970
Reactions total13,280
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 01:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

13,280 reactions across 45 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6,40848.3%
👍4,44833.5%
❤‍🔥1,1498.65%
🔥7945.98%
🥰2782.09%
🎅930.7%
😍390.294%
💔320.241%
🕊200.151%
60.045%
🤓40.03%
30.023%
😁30.023%
🤣30.023%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,280reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC≈1,740 views156 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

"В кочках", 1889 Холст, масло. 108 х 165 см Мещерский Арсений Иванович (1834-1902) Нижегородский государственный художественный музей, Нижний Новгород 👩‍🎨Пейзаж на холсте

85👍52🔥12❤‍🔥6🥰1

15 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC≈1,900 views20 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Мы уже однажды советовали вам проект Георгия Кулешова и с тех пор продолжаем за ним следить. Поэтому сегодня без долгих представлений: у наших друзей вышел выпуск, который хочется порекомендовать отдельно. Первая мировая через судьбы императоров и королей, которые знали друг друга лично. Николай II, Вильгельм II и Георг V были родственниками. Встречались, переписывались, отдыхали вместе, называли друг друга «Вилли»

👍134🤣3

15 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC≈2,190 views197 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

"Лесная поляна", 1878 Холст, масло. 35,5 х 55,5 см Шишкин Иван Иванович (1832-1898) Частное собрание, Великобритания 👩‍🎨Пейзаж на холсте

101👍58🔥31❤‍🔥6🥰1

15 Aug 2026, 05:13 UTC≈2,750 views211 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

"Вид Нижнего Новгорода" 1837 Холст, масло. 51 х 71 см Чернецов Никанор Григорьевич (1805-1879) Государственный историко-художественный музей "Новый Иерусалим" 👩‍🎨Пейзаж на холсте

119👍69🔥12🥰7❤‍🔥4

14 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC≈3,320 views242 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

"Сельский пейзаж", конец XIX - начало XX Холст, масло. 50 x 60 см Маковский Александр Владимирович (1869-1924) В центре композиции — неширокая просёлочная дорога, уходящая вглубь полотна: она словно приглашает зрителя пройти по ней и оказаться внутри этого спокойного мира. По обе стороны дороги — поля и перелески; кое‑где видны невысокие деревья, их кроны не заслоняют горизонт, а лишь мягко дробят линию неба. На пе

141👍72❤‍🔥15🔥14

14 Aug 2026, 04:55 UTC≈3,380 views270 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

"Утро", 1918 Холст, масло. Богомазов Василий Федорович (1868-1948) Курская государственная картинная галерея имени А.А. Дейнеки 👩‍🎨Пейзаж на холсте

👍10987❤‍🔥47🔥19🥰8

13 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC≈3,630 views268 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

"Яблони в цвету", 1935 Фанера, масло. 38,5 x 51,5 см Батурин Виктор Павлович (1863-1938) Самарский областной художественный музей 👩‍🎨Пейзаж на холсте

149👍78🥰28🔥11💔1😍1

13 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈3,270 views10 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

«Камера, Мотор!» - канал для тех кто любит кино 🎥 Здесь автор разбирает культовые сцены, рассказывает историю кино и конечно рассказывает о самых свежих новостях. Подписывайтесь :@cammotor

👍82

13 Aug 2026, 04:52 UTC≈3,890 views306 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

"Гроза уходит", 1978 Холст, масло. 39,5 х 62 см Каманин Александр Михайлович (1905-1989) Нижегородский государственный художественный музей 👩‍🎨Пейзаж на холсте

176👍92❤‍🔥20🔥12🥰4🎅2

12 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC≈4,080 views306 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

"Тропинка в лесу", конец 1880х Холст, масло. 39 x 34 см Левитан Исаак Ильич (1860-1900) Что можно заметить, если присмотреться: в центре — грунтовая тропинка, которая уходит вдаль между деревьями. Она покрыта опавшей листвой и травой, и это наводит на мысль об осеннем времени года. А в самом конце пути, сквозь просвет в чаще, проглядывает неясный силуэт — возможно, какого-то деревенского строения (дома или сарая).

157👍117❤‍🔥16🔥11🥰4🎅1

12 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC≈4,320 views335 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

"Над озером", 2010 Холст, масло. 75 х 115 см Тимошенко Алексей Николаевич (род. 1947) 👩‍🎨Пейзаж на холсте

195👍85❤‍🔥25🔥13🕊11🥰5🎅1

12 Aug 2026, 05:52 UTC≈4,350 views381 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

"Боголюбово. Солнце сквозь ветви", 2026 Холст, масло. 50 х 70 см Вагин Евгений (род. 1985) 👩‍🎨Пейзаж на холсте

209👍114🥰23❤‍🔥17🔥11🕊5🎅2

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @kartiny_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 448,592 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ARTерия | Искусство
@kartiny_arteriart · 163,524
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Дневник Академика Павлова | Саморазвитие
@academicpavlov · 116,246
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пейзаж на холсте | Галерея” (@kartiny_tg), 67,421 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kartiny_tg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.