Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
28 measurements spanning 99 days, net +466. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,763–9,431 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Nov 2026, 08:46
9,354
+216
9 Nov 2026, 20:54
9,138
-1
6 Nov 2026, 02:21
9,139
-5
2 Nov 2026, 18:45
9,144
+6
30 Oct 2026, 22:11
9,138
-7
27 Oct 2026, 23:25
9,145
-3
25 Oct 2026, 07:30
9,148
+1
22 Oct 2026, 14:16
9,147
-10
19 Oct 2026, 11:28
9,157
+14
16 Oct 2026, 09:18
9,143
+8
13 Oct 2026, 00:48
9,135
+30
6 Oct 2026, 19:57
9,105
+241
30 Sept 2026, 05:56
8,864
-5
19 Sept 2026, 16:18
8,869
+29
15 Sept 2026, 12:37
8,840
-8
11 Sept 2026, 15:01
8,848
-8
7 Sept 2026, 00:37
8,856
+4
2 Sept 2026, 04:28
8,852
-10
30 Aug 2026, 09:33
8,862
-1
27 Aug 2026, 14:12
8,863
first reading
Engagement
40 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.1%
avg views ÷ 9,354 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,880
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 40 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held
40 (31 July 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total
54,447
Reactions total
791
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Nov 2026, 01:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,840
Links
≈206
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,085 reactions across 40 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
347
32.0%
👍
344
31.7%
🔥
266
24.5%
💯
35
3.23%
✍
17
1.57%
❤🔥
14
1.29%
⚡
12
1.11%
🤔
12
1.11%
🕊
7
0.645%
😢
7
0.645%
👏
4
0.369%
😁
3
0.276%
😎
3
0.276%
👀
2
0.184%
😱
2
0.184%
🤝
2
0.184%
🤯
2
0.184%
🦄
2
0.184%
🍾
1
0.092%
👎
1
0.092%
2 further kinds
2
0.184%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,085 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 29 posts held from the last 30 days (17.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🇰🇷 Жестокий зимний блюз (Yeolhyeolnama), 2006, Ли Джон-бом
Два бандита приезжают в корейское захолустье, чтобы найти и ликвидировать третьего.
Еще один мощный гангстерский фильм из Южной Кореи. Жесткая история, экстремальный натурализм, максимальное погружение в местный криминальный мир.
7/10 (Очень круто)
ЛЮБИМЫЕ АКТРИСЫ:
🇦🇹🇺🇸 ХЕДИ ЛАМАРР
Дико талантливая и сексуальная актриса, первой показавшая оргазм на экране. Как-то даже жаль, что сыграла в малом количестве фильмов, большинство из которых были в лучшем случае средними.
При этом ее внеэкранная деятельность даже более известна. Будучи австрийской еврейкой, Ламарр в свое время бежала из аннексированной Третьим Рейхом Австрии и так хотела уничтожить Гитлера, что в …
🇺🇸 Сердце зверя (Heart of the Beast), 2026, Дэвид Эйр
Брэд Питт и его верный пес выживают в глухих лесах Аляски.
Честно признаться, ждал большего. Вместо захватывающего кино о выживании в экстремальных условиях получилась максимально шаблонная и слезливая поделка, играющая на многократно проверенных эмоциях через эксплуатацию «лучших друзей человека».
4/10 (Разочарование)
#Новинки
🇰🇷 Карнавал бесчестия (Biyeolhan geori), 2006, Ю Ха
Бандит среднего звена, специализирующийся на силовых акциях, пытается выйти из игры, но игра упорно отказывается его отпускать.
Мощный гангстерский фильм из Южной Кореи. Выверенный, жесткий, с колоссальным накалом драматизма.
7/10 (Золотой стандарт корейского криминального кино)
🇵🇹 Сильвестр (Silvestre), 1981, Жуан Сезар Монтейру
Энигматично-театральное произведение Монтейру, смешивающее сразу несколько португальских и общеевропейских фольклорных сюжетов.
По-португальски радикальное с точки зрения формы кино, выглядящее словно оживший средневековый гобелен. В главной роли – совсем юная Мария де Медейруш.
7/10 (Мне такое нравится)
🇯🇵 Жена признается (Tsuma wa kokuhaku suru), 1961, Ясудзо Масумура
Шедевральный «женский» нуар, конгениальный таким классическим «темным фильмам», как «Двойная страховка» и «Почтальон всегда звонит дважды».
Беря все ту же историю об адюльтере и неидеальном убийстве, Масумура выворачивает ее наизнанку. Молодая жена, убившая супруга, становится жертвой, в то время как в роли антагониста выступает японское общество ка…
🇯🇵 Ичи-киллер (Koroshiya 1), 2001, Такаси Миике
На фоне «Кинопробы» второй просмотренный фильм Миике – куда более жанровое и развлекательное кино о разборках якудза с гротескной экранной реальностью, такими же доставляющими персонажами, безостановочным мясным экшном и фонтанами крови.
Мог бы получиться настоящий жанровый шедевр, если бы не низкий бюджет и вызванные этим обстоятельством сюжетные дыры и режиссерская …
🇰🇷 В тот день, когда она вернулась (Geunyeoga dolaon nal), 2026, Хон Сан-су
Экстремальный минимализм Хон Сан-су в самой чистой форме – пять статичных кадров с долгими диалогами творческих людей.
Проходная, на самом деле, работа, но желания выключить ни разу не возникло. Сан-су в последние годы радует редко, но в то же время никогда не разочаровывает.
6/10 (Дежурно, но все равно не надоедает)
#Новинки
ЛЮБИМЫЕ АКТРИСЫ:
🇫🇷 ДОМИНИК САНДА
Очень талантливая актриса – как по мне, одна из самых необычных и запоминающихся в европейском арт-кино 70-х.
Аристократическая холодность и загадочность, сочетающаяся с невероятной чувственностью и животным магнетизмом.
💌 Конформист (Il conformista), 1970, Бернардо Бертолуччи
💌 Хрустальная колыбель (Le berceau de cristal), 1976, Филипп Гаррель
💌 Двадцатый век (Novecento), 1976…
🇰🇷 Поэзия (Shi), 2010, Ли Чхан-дон
В этом фильме Ли Чхан-дон развивает тот стиль, к которому пришел в «Тайном сиянии». И тут он, пожалуй, даже больше к месту.
Эта история о многочисленных проблемах, обрушивающихся на страдающую ранней стадией Альцгеймера старушку, получилась бы обычной манипулятивной слезовыжималкой, если бы была снята традиционно. Но, оставив драматические сцены за кадром, Ли Чхан-дон избежал бана…
🇫🇷 Горит ли Париж? (Paris brûle-t-il?), 1966, Рене Клеман
Масштабный трехчасовой военный эпик, посвященный освобождению французской столицы в годы Второй Мировой.
Каст один из самых звездных в истории французского кино – местные хедлайнеры Бельмондо, Делон, Буайе, Монтан, Синьоре + приглашенные голливудские тяжеловесы Кирк Дуглас, Гленн Форд, Энтони Перкинс и даже Орсон Уэллс.
6/10 (Классика военного кино)
🇺🇸 Народ против Ларри Флинта (The People vs. Larry Flynt), 1996, Милош Форман
Большинство голливудских байопиков, как правило, скучные и шаблонные. Но если они посвящены жизни действительно интересного и противоречивого персонажа, это однозначно идет им на пользу.
Фильм Формана про знаменитого порнографа и основателя журнала Hustler Ларри Флинта – как раз из таких. Бодрое и небезынтересное зрелище, не провисающее н…
👍23❤6😎3
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @cinematheque_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@cinematheque_tg edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
6 November 2026
Most recent edit
6 November 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
надо глянуть. @need2watch · 23,599 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
Art Cinema | Nonconformism | Мода @Kino_iskusstvo_vintazh · 89,040 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
Фильмы | Киноклуб Майкл @Kinoklub_Michael · 21,067 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 24 September 2026
Камера, Мотор! @kammotor · 23,987 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 September 2026
(not)Obsessed with cinema @obsessed_with_cinema · 19,299 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 4 October 2026
IT FOLLOWS // Однажды в кино @itfollowspub · 19,429 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 2 October 2026
PosterPorn @poster_pron · 18,964 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 4 October 2026
before your night 18+ @beforethenight · 21,316 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 September 2026
Музыкальное чтиво @muzika_chtivo · 52,353 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
Sodom and Gomorrah @SodomAnd_Gomorrah · 33,746 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 4 September 2026
Bohemia of Postmodernism | Культура @kartiny_art_iskusstvo · 63,857 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
Фигуры и формы @sculpturearts · 29,365 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CINÉMAтека” (@cinematheque_tg), 9,354 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cinematheque_tg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.