Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
شَيءٌ ما مُختلِف
@mokhtalifah
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
71,006subscribers
-239 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001316081744 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mokhtalifah |
| Description | يكتبُ.. لكي يحرّر أصابعَه منْ وداعٍ قديم. . @Shai887_bot |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mokhtalifah |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 71,006 | -141 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:01 | 71,147 | +71 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 71,076 | -34 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 71,110 | -32 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 71,142 | -26 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 71,168 | -39 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 71,207 | +51 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:36 | 71,156 | -34 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:52 | 71,190 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 71,196 | +7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 71,189 | -16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 71,205 | +5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 71,200 | +26 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 71,174 | -17 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 71,191 | -16 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 71,207 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 71,206 | +76 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 71,130 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:12 | 71,128 | -6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 71,134 | first reading |
Engagement
290 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 132 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.18%
- avg views ÷ 71,006 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,100
- 146 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 146
- of 290 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 290 (25 July 2026 – 1 October 2026) |
| Views total | 744,134 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 07:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈7,840
- Videos
- ≈69
- Links
- ≈3
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
أن تمنحني الرضا للأشياء التي رغبتُ بها ولم أنلها ثم اللّهم الصبر أينما تأخذني حكمتك
نصوص هل قناة كلش مميزة وتمثلنا📎مَمطروقة بأي قناة كلش حلوة حرفيا 🔖: __ @EVA_030 🎯🩷 __ @EVA_030 🎯🩷
”إنّ الإنسان يُشبه ما يُحب، ما يتمنّى، ما يهب، إنّ الإنسان يُشبه كُل تفاصيل عطائه.“
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
ذائقةُ الإنسان تُعَبِّر عن شخصيّته ومكنونه، وتتجَلّى في الاختيارات التي تدخل فيها إرادته، وكلما كان الإنسان مُرهَفّ الحِسّ، مُعتدل المزاج، ميّالاً بطبيعته إلى حُبّ الجمال؛ انعكَس ذلك على جَوْدة ذائقته، وحُسن اختياراته، وظهَر فيها إحساسهُ العَذب الراقي.
"الكُلُّ مُدْرِكٌ لِمَا يَفْعَلُ،وَفِّرْ اللَّوْمَ."
:فِيكِ مَنَ القَبُولِ مَا يَجْعَلُ شَخْصاً جَاءَ يُوَدَّعُكِ يَقَعُ فِي حُبِّكِ مَرَّةً أُخْرَى.🌸✨
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
{لا تدري لعلّ الله يُحدث بعد ذلك أمراً﴾ هنا تسكن أرواحنا؛ فلا ندري أين تستتر الخيرة، فرب مكروه كمنت فيه سعادتنا، ورب محبوب خفي عنا ضرره فصرفه الله عنا، والله إذا أراد بك خيراً ساقه إليك ولو كان من ممرٍ أضيق من ثقب إبرة، حتى تذهلك لحظة وصوله، وتخجل من قلّة صبرك أمام حُسن تدبيره.
Showing the 12 most recent of 290 posts we hold for @mokhtalifah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@EVA_030 · 67,6555 postsسكُـون
@SUKOON147 · 9,4414 postsطيف 𐦍
@DEPTH02 · 32,5953 postsقنقليز 💙
@gnglz · 8583 postsعلم النفس psychology
@Rayhan_23 · 1,6652 postsUnique - فريدة
@UNIQUE96_1 · 51,2702 postsفِي نَفَق البَهجَة
@sad_IQ19 · 6972 postsالآيـَّة
@aya2muhammed · 1331 postBeauty of soul
@beauty_d3 · 26,5021 post𝙼𝙰𝚁𝙸𝙰𝙼 𝚉𝚊𝚒𝚍 🔆
@faterl · 4,5411 postحَيــاة🤍~
@hayaatsh · 6141 postقنقليز
@khawatersd · 2,5011 postهَـآء!
@photo_ha99 · 7,8181 postاقتباسات 🌸 انمي 🌸 Anime🌸quotes
@samanime · 2721 post| سَديم |
@saturnH5 · 3741 postآن 🫧
@tumblr101 · 83,6771 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@SUKOON147 · 9,44129 postsهَـآء!
@photo_ha99 · 7,81811 postsبيلا || Bella
@Bella_0 · 60,0596 postsطيف 𐦍
@DEPTH02 · 32,5955 posts- مَجرّات .
@Majaraat · 59,1735 postsزُقاق
@nms19a · 23,6745 postsUnique - فريدة
@UNIQUE96_1 · 51,2704 postsأَنْتِيكة♩
@ffs_22 · 6,5644 postsيوسف
@ll0nn · 12,9054 postsآن 🫧
@tumblr101 · 83,6774 posts" ليطمئن قلبي "
@reassurance2000 · 8913 posts𝙴𝚅𝙰
@EVA_030 · 67,6552 posts𝓜𝓲racle 𝐠𝓲rl
@ghufran_52 · 9732 postsبُن🪷
@ticrr · 1,0532 postsذكريات الطفولة 📺🧸
@Stoon92 · 39,5481 post🍁 خريف العمر 🍁
@autumnSk · 46,4501 postBeauty of soul
@beauty_d3 · 26,5021 postRowan | رُوان
@rowanr7 · 5,9251 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Majaraat · 59,1734 postsبيلا || Bella
@Bella_0 · 60,0593 postsطيف 𐦍
@DEPTH02 · 32,5953 postsUnique - فريدة
@UNIQUE96_1 · 51,2703 posts𝙴𝚅𝙰
@EVA_030 · 67,6552 postsآن 🫧
@tumblr101 · 83,6772 posts𝓜𝓲racle 𝐠𝓲rl
@ghufran_52 · 9731 postيوسف
@ll0nn · 12,9051 post" ليطمئن قلبي "
@reassurance2000 · 8911 post𝑆𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑙
@still1455 · 4,9871 postبُن🪷
@ticrr · 1,0531 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 2
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@mokhtalifah named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 4 September 2026 – 4 September 2026 · confirmed gone 27 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 13 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@EVA_030 · 67,655#1
@hayaa_0 · 73,064#2
@lAlMosahfl · 776,240#3
@UNIQUE96_1 · 51,270#4
@smr120h · 104,756#5
@DEPTH02 · 32,595#6
@Majaraat · 59,173#7
@Bella_0 · 60,059#8
@M1140 · 99,853#9
@nr0lll · 81,406#10
@tumblr101 · 83,677#11
@MH2lR · 15,481#12
@lqii_i · 22,950#13
@drdonyy · 5,609#14
@CllOC · 18,178#15
@fluent_poetry1 · 60,164#16
@bggcp · 33,547#17
@hajernazem90 · 19,433#18
@beauty_d3 · 26,502#19
@yanhano · 9,525#20
@Geoooom · 71,843#21
@Ayasalh757 · 4,109#22
@n_a2u · 12,883#23
@estraha_0 · 17,275#24
@lIIM6 · 32,207#25
@luv634 · 15,699#26
@ALma313hdi · 6,063#27
@llSPR · 19,671#28
@yhb96 · 911#29
@swangirl6 · 9,959#30
@OZH_33 · 8,648#31
@UIOIU0 · 104,624#32
@fet20011 · 6,585#33
@cciiccj · 1#34
@llofen9 · 4,707#35
@matestasabnesh · 16,964#36
@azawii96 · 8,403#37
@viiiihl · 12,900#38
@ffs_22 · 6,564#39
@lRlTI · 75,491#40
@Dec369 · 3,533#41
@JJ3DA · 20,693#42
@cf67z · 87,274#43
@me_hoshi · 2,964#44
@HlllllllHio · 8,879#45
@industrious22 · 20,128#46
@FFA04 · 5,347#47
@IIU4T · 75,260#48
@jafar_art · 657#49
@fatimatali1 · 3,206#50
@Lolo_20ab · 1,961#51
@Narla2 · 70,704#52
@t8lllo · 16,482#53
@OLEIVIA · 22,281#54
@doaadawod · 8,284#55
@MEXXME · 17,776#56
@FCB_V · 89,839#57
@lSwingl · 4,063#58
@lastgoodbye1 · 20,820#59
@deved_iraq · 119,243#60
@eo_wb · 10,083#61
@photo_ha99 · 7,818#62
@vc6Il · 134,037#63
@DIUI2 · 3,387#64
@zoniijj · 2,055#65
@Diilen · 114,012#66
@euyota · 2,067#67
@rrqeaa · 14,421#68
@forqanwassam313 · 31,675#69
@IIUYL · 17,122#70
@Assro19 · 12,569#71
@P22_l2 · 238#72
@ham_zaq · 1,370#73
@soulll1 · 5,172#74
@AnaoantmA · 31,123#75
@OieeiO · 30,391#76
@Wahaj_0 · 3,688#77
@messyinsidee · 1,978#78
@z2n00 · 3,808#79
@ban_peace · 7,037#80
@jar969 · 7,780#81
@Sabara_21 · 24,311#82
@llquraanll · 247,497#83
@batnashit0 · 69,051#84
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@pic_or · 20,562
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 September 2026
@Sabara_21 · 24,311
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 September 2026
@beauty_d3 · 26,502
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 September 2026
@UNIQUE96_1 · 51,270
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026
@Bella_0 · 60,059
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
@EVA_030 · 67,655
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
@MIo3o · 26,367
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 September 2026
@tumblr101 · 83,677
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
@Ghassan_kanfani · 20,398
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 September 2026
@BM_Channel · 121,586
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
@lqii_i · 22,950
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 September 2026
@book12_1 · 26,728
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
@AnaoantmA · 31,123
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
@MAi3i · 58,693
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
@Jalal_Aldiyn · 30,033
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
@tkxx8 · 21,712
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
@shgaaaaf · 57,225
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
@Majaraat · 59,173
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
@Gibran_Khalill · 51,386
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
@v_news_iq · 70,555
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
@h1i_2 · 19,489
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 1 October 2026
@ask_33s · 24,134
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 September 2026
@Doralll · 35,365
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
@iuoeil · 102,414
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 65 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شَيءٌ ما مُختلِف” (@mokhtalifah), 71,006 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mokhtalifah.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.