Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

جبران خليل جبران | 📚

@Gibran_Khalill

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

51,949subscribers

-118 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001109387450
TypeChannel
Username@Gibran_Khalill
Descriptionشاعر وكاتب ورسام لبناني من أدباء وشعراء المهجر ، أمتاز أسلوبه بالرومانسية ويعتبر من رموز ذروة وازدهار عصر نهضة الأدب العربي الحديث، وخاصة في الشعر النثري. @Mot0oo قناة التمويل قنواتي الجميلات ♡ || @mesha_book
Created4 April 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Gibran_Khalill

Growth

51,94952,06752,0086 August 2026 — 52,067 subscribers7 August 2026 — 52,049 subscribers8 August 2026 — 52,030 subscribers9 August 2026 — 52,019 subscribers10 August 2026 — 52,015 subscribers11 August 2026 — 52,004 subscribers12 August 2026 — 51,989 subscribers13 August 2026 — 51,970 subscribers14 August 2026 — 51,949 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -118. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51,931–52,085 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:0651,949-21
13 Aug 2026, 10:2751,970-19
12 Aug 2026, 13:4551,989-15
11 Aug 2026, 12:2552,004-11
10 Aug 2026, 11:0752,015-4
9 Aug 2026, 12:5252,019-11
8 Aug 2026, 11:3852,030-19
7 Aug 2026, 14:3052,049-18
6 Aug 2026, 21:1852,067first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.02%
avg views ÷ 51,949 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,650
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held39 (23 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total142,319
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
908
Videos
6
Links
361

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 39 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Gibran_Khalill. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTC553 viewsread 15 August 2026

ليس من الضروري أن نعيش بسعادة ، ولكن من الضروري أن نعيش بشرف . — إيمانويل كانط

14 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTC557 viewsread 15 August 2026

ثق بأن .. الصوت الهادئ أقوى من الصراخ وإن التهذيب يهزم الوقاحة وإن التواضع يحطم الغرور والإحترام يسبق الحب . — وليم شكسبير

12 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC≈1,390 viewsread 15 August 2026

الحياة أقصر من أن نضيّعها بالإصغاء إلى ما يقوله الآخرون عنّا. — أندرو كارنيغي

12 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC≈1,390 viewsread 15 August 2026

لا تخجل من بُكائِكَ ، فلولا هذه العاطفة لَكُنَّا مجرد آليين وربوتات . — إليزابيث جيلبرت

12 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC≈1,390 viewsread 15 August 2026

بمجرد ما نؤجل تقديم الإعتذار يصبح الأمر أكثر صعوبة إلى أن يصبح في النهاية مستحيلاً . — مارغريت ميتشل

11 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC≈1,860 viewsread 15 August 2026

من الجميل أن تكون وحدك، أن تكون وحدك لا يعني أن تكون وحيدًا، بل يعني أنّ عقلك لا يتأثّر ولا يتلوّث بالمجتمع. ― كريشنامورتي

11 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC≈1,810 viewsread 15 August 2026

بعض العلاقات علاجُها في هدمها ، قد يؤذيك ذلك الهدم ، قد يُشعرك بالندم والألم ، قد يحرق صبرك وأيّامًا من عمرك ، ولكن إنقاذَك يبدأ من هنا. ــ فيكتور هوغو

11 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC≈1,860 views0 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @ppoiu23

"قد يغفر الإنسان لنفسه كل شيء، إلا ضعفه حين كان قادرًا على الاختيار ٠٠٠!"

9 Aug 2026, 21:19 UTC≈2,670 viewsread 15 August 2026

كُن سيئاً ، لكن على الأقل لا تكُن كاذباً مُخادعاً . — ليو تولستوي

9 Aug 2026, 21:19 UTC≈2,640 viewsread 15 August 2026

مقابلة إنسانٍ حقيقيٍّ هي أبلغ درجات الدّهشة وسط هذا الحفل التنكّري. ــ توماس مان

9 Aug 2026, 21:19 UTC≈2,640 viewsread 15 August 2026

السيئون يعرفون أنفسهم على أنهم طيبون, لكن الطيبين لا يعرفون شيئا , إنهم يقضون حياتهم وهم يغفرون للآخرين, لكنهم لا يستطيعون أن يغفروا لأنفسهم. ― بول أوستر

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @Gibran_Khalill. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 241,240 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“جبران خليل جبران | 📚” (@Gibran_Khalill), 51,949 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Gibran_Khalill.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.