حمل بر بی ادبی نزارید پیام می خونم جواب نمی دم دارم یادداشت می کنم
🎃1

Channel
@mohsenmodhejaip
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
45,486subscribers
-2,206 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001638695687 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mohsenmodhejaip |
| Description | برنامه نویسی رو یه جوری بهت یاد میدم که از مبتدی ترین حالت ممکن بتونی با من یعنی استاد مدحج درآمد داشته باشی✅ هرسوالی داشتی ام به این ایدی پیام بده👇 @IR_aihub 💚کانال دوم من، آموزش کار با ابزار هوش مصنوعی👇 @Miladaryan1 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mohsenmodhejaip |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 18:09 | 45,486 | -105 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 13:40 | 45,591 | -29 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 22:19 | 45,620 | -46 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 14:05 | 45,666 | -43 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 10:31 | 45,709 | -38 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:37 | 45,747 | -28 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 11:17 | 45,775 | -31 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:56 | 45,806 | -23 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 09:36 | 45,829 | -37 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 09:45 | 45,866 | +6 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 10:58 | 45,860 | -3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:17 | 45,863 | -1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 15:38 | 45,864 | -33 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 12:37 | 45,897 | +11 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:37 | 45,886 | -34 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 09:29 | 45,920 | -17 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:57 | 45,937 | -24 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:11 | 45,961 | -28 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:10 | 45,989 | -29 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:10 | 46,018 | first reading |
314 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 192 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 190 of 192 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 314 (31 July 2026 – 15 November 2026) |
| Views total | 286,291 |
| Reactions total | 1,546 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Nov 2026, 06:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,944 reactions across 293 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,523 | 51.7% | |
| 🎃 | 438 | 14.9% | |
| 👍 | 331 | 11.2% | |
| 🔥 | 284 | 9.65% | |
| 👌 | 128 | 4.35% | |
| 🙏 | 106 | 3.60% | |
| 💯 | 75 | 2.55% | |
| 👀 | 35 | 1.19% | |
| 🍾 | 24 | 0.815% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 296 of the 314 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,944 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 314 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 15 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 31 of 193 posts held from the last 30 days (16.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
حمل بر بی ادبی نزارید پیام می خونم جواب نمی دم دارم یادداشت می کنم
🎃1
دوستانی که برای ثبت نام می پرسید عزیزان چشم بزودی اعلام می کنم لطفا صبور باشید پیامهای پی وی تونم به دستم رسیده ببخشید جواب نمی دم باز می کنم بی جواب می مونه شرمندم نمی رسم جواب بدم اما دارم یادداشت می کنم برای کلاس بهتون آموزش متناسب بدم🕊🌹
🎃1
«من اهل فنی نیستم.» میفهمم. وقتی همه از ابزار و ایجنت حرف میزنن، آدم حس میکنه جا مونده. ولی جا موندن یعنی این چیز برای تو تازهست، نه اینکه تو بلد نیستی. برای خیلیها تازهست. توی دوره از اولین پرامت شروع میکنیم. هر جمعه یه چیز میسازی، از ۶ تا ۹ عصر، و من کنارتم. یه چیز کوچیک که دلت میخواد برای کارت داشته باشی چیه؟ بنویس: @ToseGarSupport_Win
🎃1
«سنم بالاست، شاید نشه.» این جمله رو زیاد میشنوم. ترسش واقعیه: فکر میکنی اینجا همه جوونترن و تو دیر رسیدی. ولی سالها کار توی یه شغل چیزیه که هیچ ابزاری نداره: تو میدونی مشتری چی میخواد، کار کجا گیر میکنه، چی به درد میخوره. توی این دوره کد نمینویسی. به Claude و Codex میگی چی میخوای و اونا میسازن. هیچکدومشون هم نمیپرسن چند سالته. چهار جمعه، هر بار سه ساعت، از ۶ تا ۹ عصر، و من کنارتم. اگه امشب فقط یه چیز می…
🎃1
برای دورهی ۴ جمعه + کتاب ویدیویی، چه قیمتی (میلیون تومان) به نظرت منصفانهست؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🎃1
بعد از چهار جمعه چی دستته؟ جمعهی اول: Claude و Codex رو حرفهای به کار میگیری و پرامتنویسی رو از پایه بلد میشی. جمعهی دوم: با پرامت یه محصول میسازی. جمعهی سوم: یه ایجنت میسازی که مال خودته و توی نرمافزار خودت کار میکنه. جمعهی چهارم: تستش میکنی، اصلاحش میکنی و راهاندازیش میکنی. کنارش یه کتاب ویدیویی حدود ۱۰۰ ساعته هم داری، و من هم کنارتم. 😁 برای کسبوکار تو کدوم از این چهارتا اول به کار میآد؟ بنویس: @T…
🎃1
باید پایتون بلد باشم؟ نه. توی این دوره پایتون یاد نمیگیریم. Claude و Codex کد رو مینویسن. تو فقط باید بدونی چی میخوای بسازی.
🎃1
GPT بهتره یا Claude؟ هر دو اشتراک دارن — این رو باید از اول بدونی. ولی اصل کار با هر دو یکیه: تو میگی چی میخوای، اون میسازه. توی دوره Claude و Codex رو با هم یاد میگیریم.
🎃1
«لپتاپم قدیمیه.» مشکل نیست. Claude روی سرور خودشه، نه رو لپتاپ تو 😁 تو فقط یه مرورگر داری؟ کافیه.
🎃2
مهندسی کامپیوتر نخوندی؟ خوبه 😁 مهندسی کامپیوتر یاد میداد کد بنویسی. این دوره یاد میده به Claude و Codex بگی کد بنویسن. فرق مهمیه.
🎃1
«دیر نشده؟» میشنوم زیاد. جواب: نه. Claude و Codex برنامهنویسی نمیدونن که بپرسن سنت چنده 😁 تو یاد میگیری بگی چی میخوای. همین.
🎃1
AI جام رو میگیره؟ نه. AI جام رو نمیگیره. آدمی که با AI کار میکنه میگیره 😄 این دوره دقیقاً روی همینه.
🎃1
Showing the 12 most recent of 314 posts we hold for @mohsenmodhejaip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@mohsenmodhejaip edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 12 posts on @mohsenmodhejaip as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The 6 most recent of 14 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
برای دورهی ۴ جمعه + کتاب ویدیویی، چه قیمتی (میلیون تومان) به نظرت منصفانهست؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کدوم رو بیشتر دوست داری بسازی؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
حالا اگر یکی از این سه تا رو قرار باشه یادت بدم انتخابت کدومشه
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
برای یاد گرفتن یه چیز تازه، بیشتر چی جلوتو میگیره؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
حالا بگید ببینم. به نظرتون این شغل ها چه چیز مشترکی دارن؟
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
بچه ها یه سوال.شب ساعت ۱۱ یکی از مشتری هاتون پیام می ده «قیمتش چنده؟»شما جواب می دید یا می ذارید صبح؟ 👇
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 314 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 15 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“هوش مصنوعی از صفر تا درآمد” (@mohsenmodhejaip), 45,486 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mohsenmodhejaip.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.