Job listings — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 4 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 6 of the 8 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 68 comparable posts for this entry, running 14 July 2026 to 13 October 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 4 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @divar_daneshjoyi — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 4 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
66 measurements spanning 98 days, net -2,738. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,812–31,372 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 08:06
28,223
-77
10 Nov 2026, 09:10
28,300
-60
8 Nov 2026, 17:39
28,360
-80
7 Nov 2026, 13:15
28,440
-21
6 Nov 2026, 12:56
28,461
-32
5 Nov 2026, 15:39
28,493
-22
4 Nov 2026, 17:19
28,515
-27
3 Nov 2026, 20:17
28,542
-20
2 Nov 2026, 23:06
28,562
-43
1 Nov 2026, 21:57
28,605
-85
31 Oct 2026, 22:55
28,690
-79
30 Oct 2026, 21:16
28,769
-52
29 Oct 2026, 23:19
28,821
-52
28 Oct 2026, 23:57
28,873
-26
27 Oct 2026, 22:27
28,899
-70
26 Oct 2026, 20:35
28,969
-23
25 Oct 2026, 21:45
28,992
-39
24 Oct 2026, 21:00
29,031
-154
23 Oct 2026, 19:41
29,185
-27
22 Oct 2026, 19:45
29,212
first reading
Engagement
97 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 114 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 97 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 October 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
23s
Average length
23s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
35 reactions across 13 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
20
57.1%
👎
15
42.9%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 97 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 97 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 13 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔻تو این شرایط بازار و دلار دلیلی نمیبینم که از اعضا برای ورود به VIP پول بگیرم
🙏دعای خیرتون برای ما کافی است
لینک ورود : 👇
https://t.me/addlist/9R0djKnGBS8wN2I0
به مناسبت ۲ ساله شدن عمر چنلمون چنل VIP که قیمت یک میلیون هست به 100 نفر اول رایگان میدیم و بعد از 100 نفر به طور خودکار لینک باطل میشه جوین بدین👇🏻
https://t.me/addlist/9R0djKnGBS8wN2I0
🚀 اولین پروژه بینالمللیتو چطور بگیری؟
اگر طراح، برنامهنویس، دیزاینر، تولیدکننده محتوا یا فریلنسر هستی، احتمالاً سؤال اصلیت اینه:
چطور با همین مهارتی که الان دارم وارد بازار بینالمللی بشم و پروژه دلاری بگیرم؟
در وبینار رایگان «نقشه راه ورود به بازار فریلنسینگ بینالمللی»، مسیر شروع کار برای یک فریلنسر ایرانی را قدمبهقدم بررسی میکنیم؛
از ورود به بازار جهانی تا گرفتن پروژه بینالمللی.
🎙 مدرس: حسین جوانکیش
د…
📊 از جدولهای شلوغ Excel، گزارشهای قابلفهم بساز!
🎁 وبینار رایگان «گذار از Excel به Power BI»
💡 یاد بگیر چطور:
🔹 دادههای شلوغ را مرتب کنی
🔹چطور Excel را به Power BI وصل کنی
🔹 گزارشهای تصویری بسازی
🔹 ابزار مناسب گزارشگیری را انتخاب کنی
👥 مناسب برای:
🎓 دانشجویان و تازهفارغالتحصیلها
📊 علاقهمندان تحلیل داده و هوش تجاری
💻 کسانی که با Excel کار میکنند و میخواهند حرفهایتر گزارش بسازند
🎙 مهندس امیر امینپور
مد…
✅ دعوت به همکاری
یک شرکت دانش بنیان برای تکمیل تیم کاری خود
در حوزه «برندینگ و دیجیتال مارکتینگ»
⭕️ صفر تا صد آموزش داره میتونین یادبگیرین؛
(عدم نیاز به سابقه کاری مرتبط)
🔗کار کاملاً به صورت حضوری میباشد؛
به صورت تمام وقت و پاره وقت
شرایط کاری:
◾️تعهد بالا
✅آموزش پذیر
🔘فقط ساکنین تهران
➕سن: ۱۸+ سال تا ۵۰ سال
دیپلم به بالا
📌از کسانی که تمایل به همکاری با شرکت را دارند؛
اسم کامل به همراه شماره تماس خود را به ایدی …
🔻تو این شرایط بازار و دلار دلیلی نمیبینم که از اعضا برای ورود به VIP پول بگیرم
🙏دعای خیرتون برای ما کافی است
لینک ورود : 👇
https://t.me/addlist/9R0djKnGBS8wN2I0
⏰ از یادگیری نرمافزار هلو تا ورود به بازار کار!
در دوره آموزشی آنلاین هلو آکادمی، کار با نرمافزار هلو رو گامبهگام و کاملا کاربردی یاد میگیرید!
▪️از ثبت اطلاعات و مدیریت اسناد تا انجام فرآیندهای مالی، حسابداری، بازرگانی و انبارداری
✅مناسب برای مبتدیها، حسابداران، مدیران مالی و صاحبان کسبوکار.
🗓 شروع: ۱۹ مهر ۱۴۰۵ | یکشنبه و سهشنبه | ۱۸ تا ۲۰
📌 برگزاری: نیمهخصوصی
👈 همین الان با ۲۰٪ تخفیف ثبتنام کن
Showing the 12 most recent of 97 posts we hold for @divar_daneshjoyi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@divar_daneshjoyi edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 5 posts on @divar_daneshjoyi as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
10 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
4
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@divar_daneshjoyi named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@notholidayseasonbot named in 6 posts, 8 August 2026 – 16 August 2026 · confirmed gone 6 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@mahsa_pli named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
@hji1998 named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@fbr4455 named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دیوار | دانشجویی” (@divar_daneshjoyi), 28,223 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/divar_daneshjoyi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
